I would have understood if, say, a Wiccan and a Christian got divorced, that the one might request that the child not be exposed to the religion of the other. (It wouldn't be okay, but I'd at least understand why a court might even mention the subject).
But if both parents are Wiccan, who the hell asked the court to interfere in the first place?
Read the original as well. Sounds like a judge with a problem of world veiw. Hopefully he\she gets something more than a slap on the writst for being such an ingoramus.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 08:32 am (UTC)I would have understood if, say, a Wiccan and a Christian got divorced, that the one might request that the child not be exposed to the religion of the other. (It wouldn't be okay, but I'd at least understand why a court might even mention the subject).
But if both parents are Wiccan, who the hell asked the court to interfere in the first place?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:24 am (UTC)Kudos to the people who got it ove turned.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 12:07 pm (UTC)OTOH, thank goodness the Appeals Court actually does know the law.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 01:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 03:21 pm (UTC)Heck, I won't be surprised if Bush promotes the Marion judge to the Federal bench because of this case.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 03:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: