filkertom: (okaytobetakei)
filkertom ([personal profile] filkertom) wrote2011-11-04 03:44 pm

That's All I Came Here For -- I've Already Got The Pajamas

I love my home state of Michigan. By and large, it's a lovely place. But our political system -- city, county, and state -- has gone down the effing tubes.

Brand-spankin'-new law. Hmmm. Maybe I shouldn't word it that way. Basically, it's a law with the ostensible purpose of providing more tangible protections against bullies and bullying. Y'know, like kids being beaten up by other kids.

Thing is, it's got loopholes.
The law includes a section noting it doesn't abridge First Amendment free speech rights or prohibit expression of religious or moral viewpoints — a provision Democrats fear could be used to justify harassment of gay, lesbian or transgender students.
It's worth it to follow some of the other links, including Joe My God and the straightforward Detroit News story.

Here's the thing: THERE ARE NO EXCUSES, EVER, FOR BULLYING.

You're worried about infringing on the rights of someone who is trying to harass, intimidate, threaten, and possibly physically harm someone? Fuck you. The old "your right to throw a punch ends at the tip of my nose" bit.

You say that there should be an exemption for those expressing their religious beliefs? Fuck you. We can play that game. Someone's First Amendment right to bully Someone Else because their faith "demands" it is cancelled out by Someone Else's First Amendment right protecting them from the government supporting any specific religion. Not to mention, y'know, the laws against assault. Oh, and, let's look at the tax status of any religion that says Thou Shalt Beat People Up Because They Make Us Feel All Squicky.

This is not merely a bad law, it's an asinine law. It literally provides a blueprint for how to get out of an accusation of bullying -- I Was Expressing My First Amendment Rights.

It's yet another of many, many examples of just how screwed up the people in charge really are.

I'm nowhere near ready to leave Michigan yet. But this pushes me one step closer.

Fuckers.

As far as the Republicans there are concerned,

[identity profile] sffilk.livejournal.com 2011-11-04 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
there is no reason to forbid gay-bashing in schools. Their "god" is the irreligious wrong, who want to turn this country into their version of a "christian theocracy" - no gays, Hindi, Buddhists, Jews, etc., allowed.

[identity profile] alverant.livejournal.com 2011-11-04 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It still has to make it through the rest of the law making process then stand up to the courts.

Still, the symbolism that repubs think religion justifies bullying a student is disgusting.
batyatoon: (brave little penguin)

[personal profile] batyatoon 2011-11-04 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I can see being worried about a fine line between prohibiting verbal harassment of a gay kid and prohibiting talking about one's own religious beliefs.

However: I don't see any way that a law prohibiting violence against another person's body or possessions should require any disclaimer about First Amendment rights. DO NOT HIT. How hard is that?

Maybe the law should distinguish between verbal and physical bullying. Getting a clear, non-ambiguous, unwatered law prohibiting the latter might be a lot easier to manage.

[identity profile] bayushisan.livejournal.com 2011-11-04 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I have to take a deep breath and a step back over this one. I was a victim of bullying when I was growing up. It happened in every school I attended, even the Christian school I went to.

Providing any loophole for this behaviour is asenine and dangerous. We already turn a blind eye to bullying as just "kids being kids" and it has done nothing but create more problems that carry over into adulthood.

It has created more potentially deadly problems. Teen suicide, more situations like Columbine and psychological scarring are the results of bullying and it is only going to stop when we stand together and demand that schools actually get involved in finding solutions.

[identity profile] jimhines.livejournal.com 2011-11-04 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
From my reading of the bill, the exemption wouldn't protect physical harassment or bullying, only "statements" (verbal) that originated from a "sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction."

Not that this makes it okay in any way, and I'm very much with you in the WTF. Just posted my own rant about this same thing, in fact.

When the father of the kid this bill is named after, not to mention the Michigan State Superintendent, both describe this bill as an insult and a disgrace, I think it's safe to say there's a problem.

Hm.

[identity profile] crysthewolf.livejournal.com 2011-11-05 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
I have strong inclinations toward both protecting kids from bullying and protecting kids from others abusing the system to their advantage by invoking laws like this. Thus, I tend to sit on the fence when it comes to laws such as this being passed at all, as I always fear they will be abused by someone due to things like difficulty defining "bullying", etc. I have an innate fear of compromising rights of free speech, even for a good cause, because doing so can and does bite us in the ass in ways we don't always think about when we're feeling understandably passionate about things like this.

However, from what I've been able to find and read on the actual law itself... I think I have to call bullshit right along with you, Tom. There's no good reason for this provision. All it does is give bullies an out. Religious bullies, no less, which are some of the worst kinds. *grumble*

[identity profile] roman-mclaze.livejournal.com 2011-11-05 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
I have a profound dislike for religious speech exceptions of all kinds.

Partially because it encourages the use of "God said it, not me!" as a get-out-of-jail-free card for all kinds of unpleasantness, but also because it puts the government in the business of deciding what is and is not a religion and I'm really not okay with that.

I'm not implying a slippery-slope here, I'm more bothered by a lack of one.

"Well, the Church of Pelor gets a pass on the orc-bashing cuz their holy book says they should do it, and I guess the Vecna guys are allowed to deny the Cataclysm happened cuz they've been doing it for generations and it's part of their culture, but the Raven Queen clergy aren't allowed to preach that the Vecna guys are dummyheads, cuz they've only been around for like, five years, and I think Susan made it up anyway so she could take that feat she wanted."

(See how I'm using fictional religions instead of real ones? It's cuz I'm being diplomatic and stuff!)

[identity profile] gardnerhill.livejournal.com 2011-11-05 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
To this day (30+ years since high school) I don't dare go to a reunion. I couldn't be civil with most of those people. "Oh, hi! How are you doing? Bet you have no idea how often I fantasized about riding my bike over your faces because of the shit you put me through. And largely because of you and all your super-special bestest friends, I cheer every time I watch the prom scene in Carrie."

Also to this day? When I hear about a school shooting, my very very first thought is never "Oh how horrible, what a tragedy," but "How long did the other kids bully and abuse that kid while the adults looked the other way?"

[identity profile] ladysoapmaker.livejournal.com 2011-11-05 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
As one of my friends put it, It's the Pro-Bullying Law.

I hope either they listen to the parent of the child for whom it's named and scrap it or the governor actually vetoes it.

[identity profile] mythdude.livejournal.com 2011-11-05 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
I worry about the state of our country. :(

[identity profile] capt-video.livejournal.com 2011-11-05 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
I keep seeing posts about this on other sites with loads of comments about how "we don't need laws, parents should teach their kids not to be assholes" and I am here to point out that the bullies of my school days were *encouraged* by their parents! And sometimes by teachers!

This law is literally not worth the paper it's printed on.
jenrose: (humancontact)

[personal profile] jenrose 2011-11-05 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
K's grade school did not have a "no sexual harassment" policy.

They did not have a "No gender or sexual orientation harassment policy."

They did not have a "No racial harassment policy."

They had a "No harassment" policy.

It's just that simple.

Best summed up by Wil Wheaton. "Don't be a dick."

There is no excuse for harassment. Period. Ever. Not because you believe something you feel morally bound to persuade someone. Not because you think you know better than them. Not because you're trying to correct their ways, or make you sleep with them, or make sure they know their place. There. Is. No. Excuse.

[identity profile] jhayman.livejournal.com 2011-11-06 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Bullying is out and out nasty.
ANY physical bullying is assault
Assault is illegal.

Verbal bullying is harassment.
Harassment is illegal.

Period.

There is no excuse, not ever.