That story's actually from last fall. Nothing has been published on it yet and it hasn't been replicated, so it's promising, but still only anecdotal. They're apparently working on getting it into clinical trials, but the fact that nothing has been announced after 7 months makes me wonder - if it was really working that fast and well, I would think they'd have fast-tracked it and we should have heard something more by now.
Son, be a rat dentist: (Be a rat dentist!) You have a talent for causing great pain. (Pain!) Be a rat de-entist: (Be a rat dentist!) People will pay you to be inhumane! (Inhumane!)
The thing that interests me is that it is umbilical cord stem cells that they were working with and they made an interesting case that they are actually safer than working with embryonic stem cells.
I would say that if you can make this kind of advancements a byproduct of a natural function, something that is routinely thrown away, then that removes a lot of the ethical concerns.
There is only one source of concern that I have. I remember reading an article a few months back about how if this became widespread, we would have trouble getting the amount of umbilical cords that we need because very few doctors and hospitals save them in a usuable format. But if the science became widespread, I could see that being changed quickly.
Even if they are using umbilical cells (to which I cannot think of a single ethical objection -- basically, it's healing people using garbage), I can imagine this being an impossible sell anyway.
Too many people make up their minds about an issue after hearing a randomly chosen 50% of the words in the first sentence of its description, and cannot be dissuaded from this opinion by any means.
Part of me hopes that it really works and works that fast. My sister has MS. Stem cell research is one of the things that may contribute to a cure for it.
Part of me is skeptical that it would work that fast. My son has multiple orthopedic issues due to a birth defect called arthrogryposis. We have been working with him for years to get him to the point where he can do things. If the patient was paralyzed for 19 years, it is going to take more than three weeks to build those muscles back up.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
wow....
I would say that if you can make this kind of advancements a byproduct of a natural function, something that is routinely thrown away, then that removes a lot of the ethical concerns.
There is only one source of concern that I have. I remember reading an article a few months back about how if this became widespread, we would have trouble getting the amount of umbilical cords that we need because very few doctors and hospitals save them in a usuable format. But if the science became widespread, I could see that being changed quickly.
no subject
Sorry to be a buzzkill.
no subject
no subject
Too many people make up their minds about an issue after hearing a randomly chosen 50% of the words in the first sentence of its description, and cannot be dissuaded from this opinion by any means.
no subject
Lord, I hope it works. I hope they can eventually duplicate it and prove the theory.
no subject
Part of me is skeptical that it would work that fast. My son has multiple orthopedic issues due to a birth defect called arthrogryposis. We have been working with him for years to get him to the point where he can do things. If the patient was paralyzed for 19 years, it is going to take more than three weeks to build those muscles back up.
no subject