IRON MAN 2 Spoiler Thread, Part 2
May. 11th, 2010 09:47 pmAnne, Leslie and I just saw Iron Man 2. Bwaha. That frickin' rocked. The trailers, not so much. Especially Grown-Ups -- who in the name of the Flying Spaghetti Monster greenlit that?
Anyway, more discussion, and this time I'll join in (and respond to stuff from the previous thread).
Anyway, more discussion, and this time I'll join in (and respond to stuff from the previous thread).
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 01:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 02:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 02:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 02:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 03:12 am (UTC)The movie was pretty good! I liked the fight scenes and watching Stark develop. The scariest part was seeing him drunk in the suit and blasting things people threw into the air. I was scared he would wind up hurting someone (it could happen). But there were things I would have chopped. Like the "mother in law" weapon. Hammer overhyped it so much you knew it was going to fail. Loved the War Machine armor though.
The teaser at the end could go either way. We already know Thor is the next movie so just uncovering the hammer was a bit of a let down. Maybe something more godly in scale like an outline of Asgard or seeing Loki or Odin plotting. That would have been awesome. That agent who reported that they found Thor's hammer turned out to BE Loki.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 03:29 am (UTC)My buddy Russ, who has been worried about how they were going to do "Thor", was screaming out "Brick on a Stick, Brick on a Stick!" obviously happy.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 03:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 03:31 am (UTC)Super 8
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 04:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 10:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 10:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 10:56 am (UTC)The literal throwaway of Cap's shield was also beautiful. They're keeping the mythology in mind as they do this.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 10:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 10:57 am (UTC)And a few responses to the previous thread....
Date: 2010-05-12 11:04 am (UTC)Got that. I adored Rourke's Whiplash. He played Hammer like a fiddle.
I really didn't believe in Justin Hammer as a brilliant industrialist. Had we seen more of an "anything to win" side of him earlier in the film, and known that his "I'm such a goofy guy" act was just a public veneer, his actions later in the film would have made more sense. A little rewriting of the Senate hearing and the scenes in Monaco would have done the trick.
Rourke was amazing as usual. Having Ivan own a pet bird was his idea. He saw there was little to the character beyond the vengeance plot, so he suggested the bird as a humanizing aspect...."
I saw Hammer as a Tony Stark wannabe -- someone who's maybe got the brains to go only so far, and not quite enough Mad Genius to get into Stark's league, but he thinks he's close enough, and he's a showman too dammit, and and and. Given that, Rockwell was an inspired casting choice.
And, yeah, the business with the bird was very good. Rourke has not only resurrected his career, he's showing off stuff nobody ever knew he had, and it's great.
And a few more....
Date: 2010-05-12 11:07 am (UTC)Yeah, that whole thing was a little odd. Funny, but very very odd.
More...
Date: 2010-05-12 11:36 am (UTC)Ivan's backstory was made reasonably clear along the way, and once you realize that his dad got shafted by Tony's dad it all falls into place.
Garry Shandling as Senator Stern was excellent. Utterly against type for him, and very well done.
And quite a lot from <lj user="jrtom">....
Date: 2010-05-12 11:45 am (UTC)I really didn't believe in Hammer as being even moderately intelligent, period. To me, he had a vibe of "I inherited this business from my father and I haven't managed to screw it up yet" (basically, Tony Stark without the charisma and brilliance in R&D). I didn't read the comics so I have no idea of his actual backstory, but that's how he came off."
Like I said, a Tony Stark wannabe. Literally. His actual backstory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Hammer) was yet another formidably smart, cranky older dude, so I didn't mind the retcon.
"How did Vanko manage to create another suit without anyone noticing? You can't tell me that Hammer (dumb as he appeared) didn't have him under 24/7 surveillance."
As if Hammer would recognize what Ivan was doing....
"I thought that the bit with the bird had the potential to go somewhere and then it kind of fizzled. (Why did Vanko just let it go when Hammer tried to pawn another bird off on him?)"
Seriously, what could he do? The bird was his link to humanity. Heck, he even grew fond of the replacement bird. Think of this: As far as Hammer knows, Vanko has made one request: get his pet bird from Russia. Hammer botched it. As soon as Hammer started in with his "It's a very nice bird" bit, I suspect Vanko wrote him off, chalked up another mark on the "You're Gonna Get Yours" scorecard for Hammer, and moved on.
"Do not engage in close combat with the guy whose best weapons only work at close range. Sheesh, guys."
Agreed, although that was always why Whiplash/Blacklash got any advantage in the comics. Stark is an egomaniac, after all, and he's gotta be thinking, "What's a guy with a whip gonna do to me?"
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 11:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 01:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 02:08 pm (UTC)"*grumble* guy's dead 20 years & he's still taking me to school."
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 02:59 pm (UTC)Yeah, but I forgive that one because Downey and Cheadle's delivery on "Hammer Tech?" "Yeah." was perfect.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 03:13 pm (UTC)It is possible they can pull this off. There has been some solid writing in Hollywood the last 6 years or so. But it's also possible the studio will just hire anyone for cheap and count on the ironman tie-in to make it popular (which doesn't work, but they keep doing it anyways).
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 04:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 04:33 pm (UTC)