Disney Buying Marvel
Aug. 31st, 2009 10:16 amHoly crap.
Okay, very first thing: Maybe the comics will improve. Seriously. A lot of the dark, insane shit Marvel has done over the past ten years drove me out of buying comics completely. Disney won't like a lot of that stuff, though.
Second thing: Marvel has a shitload of licenses with Universal Studios down the street. Like, many of the major rides at Universal's Islands of Adventure. What's gonna happen to them?
Third thing: Status of the movie studio? Animation studio? Existing merch licenses?
Fourth, fifth, sixth, etc. Wow. I foresee a new theme park in the offing. Perhaps a Marvel-themed reboot of the former Pleasure Island.
Thoughts?
ETA: I went to the store this morning, and they had some comics in the magazine section. The most recent Amazing Spider-Man, Incredible Hulk (as opposed to Hulk) #600.
Mother of God.
Disney really can't fuck these up any worse than these yahoos already have.
Okay, very first thing: Maybe the comics will improve. Seriously. A lot of the dark, insane shit Marvel has done over the past ten years drove me out of buying comics completely. Disney won't like a lot of that stuff, though.
Second thing: Marvel has a shitload of licenses with Universal Studios down the street. Like, many of the major rides at Universal's Islands of Adventure. What's gonna happen to them?
Third thing: Status of the movie studio? Animation studio? Existing merch licenses?
Fourth, fifth, sixth, etc. Wow. I foresee a new theme park in the offing. Perhaps a Marvel-themed reboot of the former Pleasure Island.
Thoughts?
ETA: I went to the store this morning, and they had some comics in the magazine section. The most recent Amazing Spider-Man, Incredible Hulk (as opposed to Hulk) #600.
Mother of God.
Disney really can't fuck these up any worse than these yahoos already have.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:32 pm (UTC)And if Universal decide not to pay, Disney just might acquire a fifth gate and a Disney thrill park that fans have been wanting. Win-win.
Now, Stan Lee is already working with Disney; they own his POW label. There's some hope that this might put Stan back in at Marvel, which the blogger I read says would be a good thing. http://thedisneyblog.com/2009/08/31/disney-aquires-marvel-superheros-to-join-disney-fold/
Disney already owns all the Saban properties, so they have some action heroes in the stable already (Power Rangers being the most obvious, although when Saban sold to Disney, they owned the rights to Gatchaman II and Gatchaman F! Can't wait to see how THAT plays out with the upcoming Imagi Gatchaman movie!)
I just reread that. Power Ranger/X-man crossover, anyone?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:37 pm (UTC)I don't see this being good in the long term as Disney wants to keep everything family friendly and comics need to be a little edgy if they want to expand past their children's audience. Plus Disney has a bad habit of messing with a good thing by getting their grubby little fingerprints on everything. We'll have to see what they do, but I'm not optimistic.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:46 pm (UTC)Yet, with Disney's guidance and restrictions, I fear we're seeing the end of the Tin and Lead Age.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:50 pm (UTC)Not fond of the Mouse. Sorry.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:54 pm (UTC)Note: about hmmm, 6-7 years ago, Marvel did have a theme restaurant up at Universal CityWalk in California. Marvel Mania was not bad, it was all bright colors and iffy food. The walkaround characters were pretty superior. If Captain America comes up to you and says to drink your healthful milk, you do it, And if Wolverine does the same, you drink it faster, bub!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 02:58 pm (UTC)And since Marvel comics are decidedly NOT PC, either Disney's corporate mentality must change, or the stories under Marvel must change. See if you can guess who is going to blink first - the rich suits or the starving writers?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 03:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 03:40 pm (UTC)http://www.monitorduty.com/2009/08/disney-to-acquire-marvel-entertainment/
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 03:42 pm (UTC)On one hand, it's true that the Disney family-friendly image is, at first blush, not at all in sync with the Marvelverse's brand of grit, violence, and soap-operatic plotting.
OTOH, it's also demonstrably true that Disney doesn't meddle in everything it touches. As
Also, it seems to me that parts of the Disney empire have already been sticking their toes in both sides of the superhero pond; hasn't Disney's second cable channel (branded nowadays as Disney XD) acquired and shown past programming from both the DC and Marvel families in recent years?
Then, too, think about which studio it was that gave us what I consider the single best-written animated dramatic/adventure series of all time, bar none....
Gargoyles.
There are no guarantees. But I don't think the Marvel franchises are necessarily doomed.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 03:50 pm (UTC)/Spoilers start/
Apparently he had a "master" all these years who taught him the dark arts and we get to meet him and his assistant. Mad at Doom's failures, he sends Doom back in time to get ripped apart from dinosaur-era sharks. Doom survives and rebuilds his body down to the atom so when meets the "master" in the future/past, he won't be recognized. He becomes the "master's" assistant and helps to train himself. At the right moment he betrays his "master" and presents himself as the new uber-Doom devoid of whatever positive qualities the old Doom might have had.
/Spoilers stop/
In their War of Kings story they totally gutted and revised the origin of one of my favorite characters, Darkhawk. I'm loosing such an interest in comics these days. If Marvel isn't screwing up their characters, DC is hitting the reset button. Most of my comics are by the independent companies, and even then I'm wondering if it would be better to just stop.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 03:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 03:52 pm (UTC)The great mouse god must go.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 03:58 pm (UTC)"I see the fan community already salivating over Pixar X-Men (has Pixar done any adaptations, guys?) or dreading Hannah Montana joining the Avengers, or hoping that Disney will immediately fire Joe Quesada and reinstate the kind of comics they use to love back when Disney had no interest in Marvel. Or dreading that Disney will 'wimpify' Marvel. Or exulting that now Marvel can be like Vertigo and publish comics that don't make money, because they can spend Disney's money without expecting to make a profit. And a lot of other things that don't seem likely, either.
"My reaction: This will change things. Whether it'll change things in a good way, in a bad way or (most likely) in a mixture of both, it'll change things," he said. "How? No way to tell yet, so there's not much point in drawing conclusions of any kind. I hope we have Roger Langridge "Muppet Show" comics for a long time to come, though.
"I do recall, back in the '80s, people at Marvel used to say they wanted to be Disney for older audiences. Well, I guess now they are. What that means, though, remains to be seen."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 04:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-31 04:31 pm (UTC)