(no subject)

Date: 2011-06-09 08:16 pm (UTC)
Agreed... at least until you run up against religious and/or social prohibitions. Here in the US, for example, the Catholic Church's prohibition against birth control has largely lost its grip -- but the same can't be said for many other countries. That's a problem. So are cultures that measure a man's masculinity by the number of children (or the number of sons) that he fathers.

Also not happy AT ALL with the classism of "if you need public assistance, stop fucking". This implies that anyone who isn't desperately poor can go ahead and have all the children they want because "they can afford it" -- which (1) does little to fix the problem and (2) is right in line with current Republican attitudes, which are disgusting to say the least.

*sigh* What I wouldn't give for a tasteless, odorless, medically-safe, readily-soluble substance that would reduce human fertility by 50%. In container-load quantities, with a worldwide distribution plan. (Hey, if I'm going to fantasize, I might as well do it in a big way!)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 02:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios