Phuque The Chimp
Aug. 18th, 2006 01:12 pmThis morning, regarding the ruling that he violated the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution and the FISA laws, Dear Leader said:
I would say that those who, um, um, herald this decision simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live.I could go off on this a gazillion ways from Sunday, but John at AmericaBlog does it as well as it can be done.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 05:33 pm (UTC)Unfortunately they'll probably replaced by something worse. :-(
Sigh. I'd sent it to my Republican brother, but he wouldn't listen.
Date: 2006-08-18 05:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 06:11 pm (UTC)Signed,
Proud member of the reality-based community
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 06:52 pm (UTC)We also understand the Constitution of the United States, the separation of powers, and the barely remaining scintilla of the Fourth Amendment, which puts us at least three up on the current administration.
Have Uncle Dick explain what "scintilla" means.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 07:01 pm (UTC)WHY does his abuse of language bother me as much as his abuse of the Constitution. WTF, me.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 07:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 07:15 pm (UTC)I am also disgusted that his response is simplly, "you don't understand". I know it's a huge bother for him to actually EXPLAIN his thought process to us. But hey, being the president means you don't have to justify yourself to the people you represent.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 08:24 pm (UTC)Still, I feel like I should get some perspective. The policies he's endorsing and the attitude he's expressing should bother me more than the fact that he's expressing them in a subliterate fashion.
Shouldn't they?
Oh, he got elected twice
Date: 2006-08-18 08:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 08:32 pm (UTC)-- U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, in ordering a halt to President Bush's warrantless surveillance of Americans
Can we have her as our President? Please?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 08:37 pm (UTC)Why must we suspend our liberties?
To aid the battle against terrorism!
Why must we battle terrorism?
To preserve our liberties!
Ooohhh
Date: 2006-08-18 08:51 pm (UTC)Re: Ooohhh
Date: 2006-08-18 09:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 09:06 pm (UTC)The Presidency - and governance in general - is not a job for an average man. But a significant portion of our country believes that our leader ought to be an average guy that they can relate to, and in believing so have elected to office an average guy who is completely unequal to the task before him.
And of course, as an unintelligent man in a job requiring a great deal of intelligence, he reacts to the thoughts and opinions of those smarter than him who disagree with him with contempt, scorn, and condescension.
Aravosis is right on the money, though. Compared to the requirements of his job, he's an ignorant fool.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 09:24 pm (UTC)Right, so, what makes people think he's just going to walk away after he's unelected in 2008?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 09:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 10:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-19 12:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-19 12:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-19 01:40 am (UTC)Politics should be a demanding career. At very least it should demand the ability to think clearly, and express one's thoughts equally clearly. Behind all our parliaments stands the Roman Senate, in which brilliant speakers defended their views using all the techniques of rhetoric. (Mind you, there were some less brilliant ones, including the one immortalised by Catullus who cleaned his teeth with urine so that he could distract from the stupidity of what he was saying with his flashing smile. Now why does that seem so familiar?) Articulacy and clarity of expression is kind of important when making and executing laws. Bush has demonstrated time and again that he does not possess these qualities.
But what worries me about him is not his diction, nor his intelligence, nor his disregard for the laws of his country. It's the fact that he wasn't elected, and he's still there. All the rest is just consequences of that primary wrongness.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-19 01:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-19 01:50 am (UTC)I think it'll go one of two ways. Either he'll repeal the anti-FDR act or whatever it was called and they'll rig the election again, or he'll go, the next patsy will step up to the plate and they'll rig the election again. I don't think you'll have another fair election in America under the current system. It's too easy for them to put the fix in.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-19 02:40 am (UTC)He'd also have to get it done *before* the primaries for the 2008 election.
Of course, given his behavior with other issues, he *might* try to claim he can ignore it. But that one would be a *lot* harder to sell to the public. And given the *months* between the nomination and the election, it's virtually certain to go thru the courts. And I don't think even the current Supreme court would go for anything that blatant.
Reality never touches this.
Date: 2006-08-19 03:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-19 04:31 am (UTC)Rigging elections is an old pasttime. LBJ won his first congressional seat based on some last minute "found" ballot boxes that tipped the election.
Nowadays its about pre-disqualifying voters, engineering long voting lines, messing with absentee ballot counts, and possibly directly tampering with electronic voting machines.
If only it weren't about the American people being stupid...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-19 03:23 pm (UTC)Because the government is after us!
Why is the government after you?
Because we're so heavily armed!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-20 05:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-20 06:15 am (UTC)If he tried to overrule the *election*, that'd likely be enough to trigger an active revolt.