Navigation
Page Summary
capplor.livejournal.com - Well, I'll tell you, *I* was pretty POd
partiallyclips.livejournal.com - (no subject)
filkertom.livejournal.com - Re: Well, I'll tell you, *I* was pretty POd
pabsungenis.livejournal.com - (no subject)
morpheus0013.livejournal.com - (no subject)
filkertom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fair-witness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
j-e-richards.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fair-witness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
smallship1.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rook543.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Fluid Measure by
- Theme: Warm Embrace by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Well, I'll tell you, *I* was pretty POd
Date: 2006-08-21 05:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 05:45 pm (UTC)Arrest Finally Made in JonBenet Ramsey Case
Huge federal task force will now shift its attention to bin Laden.
Re: Well, I'll tell you, *I* was pretty POd
Date: 2006-08-21 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 07:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 07:40 pm (UTC)Actually, I don't love its point, or at least the message it appears to convey on one level. I loathe the practice of making one life, or type of death, more important than another.
Is the media over-salivating over JonBenet Ramsey? Yes, and they have for 10 years. The media has a long, long, LONG history of such things. Are very important stories getting pushed aside? Yes, but by less important stories than the Ramsey case.
Still. I'm uncomfortable with the portrayal that one life is worth more than another--whether that's a 6-year-old who died 10 years ago or a soldier.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 07:50 pm (UTC)In other words, a possible break in a ten-year-old local news story overrode Dear Leader savaging the Constitution and The Other War In The Mideast.
Nobody's trying to say one death is more important than another... unless they're trying to distract you from something.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 07:58 pm (UTC)BTW, did you hear that the IRS is having to outsource some of its work? (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/20/business/20tax.html?ei=5090&en=b7fe197ea6058f49&ex=1313726400&adxnnl=1&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1156172768-nfAJ8KLS0pAVN1CcKVg3fw) I thought this paragraph sums it up nicely:
The move, an initiative of the Bush administration, represents the first step in a broader plan to outsource the collection of smaller tax debts to private companies over time. Although I.R.S. officials acknowledge that this will be much more expensive than doing it internally, they say that Congress has forced their hand by refusing to let them hire more revenue officers, who could pull in a lot of easy-to-collect money.
I suppose I should be grateful the story made the NY Times at all.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 08:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 08:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-21 10:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-22 12:04 am (UTC)