Navigation
Page Summary
tfabris.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nimitzbrood.livejournal.com - I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
partiallyclips.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nimitzbrood.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nimitzbrood.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
batyatoon - (no subject)
nimitzbrood.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shockwave77598.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brithistorian.livejournal.com - (no subject)
filkerbrl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
admnaismith.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
dr-zrfq.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brithistorian.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nimitzbrood.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
vixyish.livejournal.com - (no subject)
vixyish.livejournal.com - (no subject)
filkertom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
palenoue.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
filkertom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pixel.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
beldar.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
beldar.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
beldar.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
pixel.livejournal.com - Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
batyatoon - (no subject)
bchbum-98.livejournal.com - Mortgages
Style Credit
- Base style: Fluid Measure by
- Theme: Warm Embrace by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 11:35 am (UTC)The most striking photo, a house on top of a car. Still there, one year later:
I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 01:05 pm (UTC)As a friend of mine put it "Why the heck are you living in a hole that is below sea level right next to the ocean anyway?"
I think they should have flooded the heck out of it even more than it was then built the new city around the rim. Guided boat tours and diving a plus.
I'm not trying to sound harsh here but when you can't bury a body below ground it's not really a place you should be living.
I can understand the lost history aspect but honestly it's never going to be the same again anyway. Just this once instead of rebuilding the old I think we should be building new.
Please keep in mind that is is ALL OPINION on my part. The last thing I want to do here is start a flamewar on
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 01:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 01:36 pm (UTC)Or even more important getting off this rock?
Sorry...the way this whole Katrina thing was handled makes me a little bitter when I think about it...
I had friends go down there and help and I couldn't go with so I also feel a little guilty. :-(
Truthfully though? There were a lot of people around here that shrugged their shoulders and sat on their asses. I think that attitude sickens me most of all.
I at least ponied up a couple hundred for gas for my friends while they were down there.
Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 01:42 pm (UTC)There are literally TONS of cheap housing options out there that can be pre-fabbed in almost no time. Why didn't someone step in and fund those?
Hell! It would have cost almost nothing to construct sprayed concrete monolithic domes (http://www.monolithic.com/plan_design/house_plans/1/1043.html) that would withstand any future floods without a problem.
Are we truly so cold as beings that we can't perceive the need for these sorts of things?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 01:54 pm (UTC)But there's no way we'll do that. We can't.
It is in fact possible to bury bodies below ground in New Orleans. Or at least it was a year before Katrina, when we buried my grandfather.
And yes, that's just one of a thousand kinds of reasons why people attach themselves to a place and won't leave it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 02:10 pm (UTC)But there's got to be a point where people say "Enough!".
On the other hand I can see many people staying just to prove they aren't beaten. I can identify with this too. I just think that maybe it's the wrong thing to do in this case.
Like I said though - only my opinion.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 02:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 03:22 pm (UTC)I admit to being rather surprised by how much recovery was still to be done - having lived through previous hurricanes, I can remember things always springing back up with mushroom-like rapidity.
The Mississippi coast has recovered more than New Orleans, which I attribute to:
A. Having suffered only the hurricane, without the subsequent flooding.
B. Quicker action as far as new flood insurance maps.
We didn't go into New Orleans proper this time, as my in-laws have all used their insurance money to resettle in Metairie and Kenner (the western suburbs). Driving through/over the city at night on I-10/I-610, I was struck by the number of formerly thriving neighborhood which were now completely dark and uninhabited. Even in the western suburbs, which suffered less than the city proper, it looked like at least half the people were still living in FEMA trailers, and even the inhabitable houses mostly had blue roofs. The businesses that have managed to reopen don't have signs up yet. Businesses that were previously open 24-hours now struggle to find enough employees to stay upon on a more limited schedule. Even as far away as Biloxi, Mississippi, fast food places are still offering $125/week bonuses to try to attract employees.
At this point, I think the only things really holding back the recovery on the Mississippi coast is the need to rebuild the Highway 90 bridges in Biloxi and Bay St. Louis - I think once those are back in place, recovery will jump into fast forward. In New Orleans, on the other hand, recovery hasn't even properly begun. So many people are still in a holding pattern, waiting to find out if they'll even be able to get flood insurance if they rebuild and, if so, what the building requirements will be. The few people who have rebuilt in my wife's aunt's old neighborhood (a couple of blocks south of the University of New Orleans, have rebuilt up on pilings. You used to see that out at fishing camps, but never in the middle of New Orleans. To the extent that New Orleans does ever come back, it will (with the exception of the French Quarter and the Garden District, which Cannot Ever Change) look very different.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 03:32 pm (UTC)If he's not busy emptying his bowels every 10 minutes, he's trying to pass himself off as a tech wizard. Just remember, there are people out there who know all about you. From your blatherings on politics to your chemical imbalances to your throwing down customer files and stomping on them because you have the mentality of a child.
Now go get me some mutton bitch.
Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 03:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 03:49 pm (UTC)Something to ponder though: the parts of New Orleans with an elevation below sea level were once *above* sea level. There appears to be evidence that the levees themselves are part of the cause for the city's sinking.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 03:52 pm (UTC)Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 03:54 pm (UTC)I'd honestly forgotten about the Dutch but I still don't think it matters in this case. The area is pretty trashed an IMO should have been wiped clean. Give those people a fresh start.
But you've got a very good point! And an even better one would be would anything the Dutch did over their history apply here? Can we apply some of their current technology to solve this issue once and for all?
Seems pretty silly that we can do all this industrial stuff in the world but we can't keep water out of a hole...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 03:58 pm (UTC)So much that's just still sitting there, so much that's just deserted. And yes, there really is a house on top of that car...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 04:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 04:09 pm (UTC)Oh, sorry, that's right. You're a troll. You're wrong about pretty much everything else, and I have no idea what brought this on, and you're banned.
Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 04:19 pm (UTC)I just wonder when it's finally going to sink in the American consciousness. Hopefully before the coming election.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 04:42 pm (UTC)Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 04:47 pm (UTC)Real buildings, designed for a family of four, fully insulated, can withstand 140MPH winds, cheaper per unit than the FEMA trailers, able to be expanded onto or used as a permanent guest house.
And FEMA can't build them because FEMA isn't allowed to build 'permanent structures'. And they won't bend the rules, or change them to allow people safe permanent housing for less than the temporary trailers. Instead FEMA has nearly 11,000 trailers sitting on an airfield in Hope AK (http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/47/17632). Where they are not being used, and costing us a ton of money to keep their.
Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 04:49 pm (UTC)It's amazing that the Bush bunch can be compared to the old Soviet central planning that let wheat rot unharvested in the fields -- while Moscow begged for food aid from the U.S. -- because some bureaucrat hadn't thought things through (wasn't his job to).
Not all the city is so far beneath sea level. In fact the French Quarter had moderate flooding which subsided rather quickly -- very good news from a historical preservation and tourism standpoint. A Newsweek article quotes Dutch engineers as saying they could get cracking on a plan to make NOLA floodproof in a matter of months, if Uncle Sam would just ask.
Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 05:01 pm (UTC)You wouldn't believe some of the roundabout journeys mail took when they first went to two-letter postal abbreviations.
Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 05:02 pm (UTC)Re: I know I'm going to generate some flamage here...
Date: 2006-08-29 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 07:36 pm (UTC)It's a question of what people feel is important, and this is one of those cases where perceived importance is actual importance.
Mortgages
Date: 2006-08-30 12:38 am (UTC)I would think (A.)that every house inside the levees would require flood insurance in order for the owner to write a mortgage note on it. And (B.) the folks responsible for issuing flood insurance would periodically test the worthiness of the levees. Assuming that (A.) happened and (B.) either didn't happen or was inadequate, the federal government, who underwrites flood insurance owes a boatload of money to the policy-holders. I'm pretty confident that the insurance has been or will be paid.
The next question is whether or not the feds should write new policies on existing or new homes in the flood-prone area. It seems to me that the answer should be "NO" unless and until the levees are rebuilt to withstand a category 5 hurricane coming straight at the city.
That hasn't happened, and therefore I don't think any homes inside the levees should get flood insurance, and the owners should not be able to borrow on the homes, and therefore the only construction happening ought to be by folks who have the cash to build and no mortgage debt - which is almost NOBODY.
I love New Orleans and hope it will survive, but let's not put the cart before the horse.