Superman Doesn't Return
Feb. 19th, 2007 07:43 pmI am finally watching Superman Returns. About a half-hour in.
There is a lot of goodness in this film. A surprising amount. Kevin Spacey absolutely rocks. Parker Posey as Teschmacher II. The sequence of saving the plane. The elements of the earlier Superman movies integrated and updated. (Although, again, I really wish they'd done something, y'know, new.) A lot of goodness.
But not Kate Bosworth.
And not Brandon Routh.
I want to buy it. I want to like him. And I simply can't. It's as if they know how to write all the other characters, but not Lois and Clark/Superman. The kid playing Jimmy Olsen has way more charisma. And I am sick to the teeth of the Clark Kent Oppressed And Yet Ignored By Everybody riff.
But, mostly, he's just... bland. The warm smile Reeve pulled off so effortlessly completely eludes Routh. He's stiff. Uncomfortable with his character, his clothes, and his own body. And he still looks like a frat boy in a Halloween costume.
This guy is no more Superman than I am.
And this is one of those times when I'm really annoyed I was right.
Update: All done.
Never bought him as Superman. Not once. A couple of long shots looked good, but nothing, nothing close. Never bought Bosworth as Lois. Thought the plot with the kid was completely unnecessary from the git-go. Bluntly, we could've collectively done a Mad-Lib and come up with a better script. I can think of a dozen stories right off the bat that would've been better than this.
They committed the ultimate movie crime: they made a boring movie.
About Superman, no less.
There is a lot of goodness in this film. A surprising amount. Kevin Spacey absolutely rocks. Parker Posey as Teschmacher II. The sequence of saving the plane. The elements of the earlier Superman movies integrated and updated. (Although, again, I really wish they'd done something, y'know, new.) A lot of goodness.
But not Kate Bosworth.
And not Brandon Routh.
I want to buy it. I want to like him. And I simply can't. It's as if they know how to write all the other characters, but not Lois and Clark/Superman. The kid playing Jimmy Olsen has way more charisma. And I am sick to the teeth of the Clark Kent Oppressed And Yet Ignored By Everybody riff.
But, mostly, he's just... bland. The warm smile Reeve pulled off so effortlessly completely eludes Routh. He's stiff. Uncomfortable with his character, his clothes, and his own body. And he still looks like a frat boy in a Halloween costume.
This guy is no more Superman than I am.
And this is one of those times when I'm really annoyed I was right.
Update: All done.
Never bought him as Superman. Not once. A couple of long shots looked good, but nothing, nothing close. Never bought Bosworth as Lois. Thought the plot with the kid was completely unnecessary from the git-go. Bluntly, we could've collectively done a Mad-Lib and come up with a better script. I can think of a dozen stories right off the bat that would've been better than this.
They committed the ultimate movie crime: they made a boring movie.
About Superman, no less.
Have to agree
Date: 2007-02-20 01:06 am (UTC)I wish Kevin Spacey and Christopher Reeve could have torn up the scenery together but it was not to be. Oh well, all we can do now is pray the sequel sputters and dies...but I doubt even Superman AND Lex Luthor working together could stop that disaster.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 01:12 am (UTC)Amen. In truth, this, even more than the failure of the main characters to look the part, was what killed the movie for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 01:13 am (UTC)In this case, I don't have it in me to dislike Routh...I don't think I've heard anyone say he's awful. But for so many of us, particularly my generation, Chris Reeve was and is the Superman. And I think anyone trying to follow in those bootprints was going to fail. The kid did okay. He was there.
But Bosworth...Miss I-Have-Two-Facial-Expressions-Blank-And-Pissed-Off...was a complete and total clunker, coming very close to wrecking the whole experience for me. And to add insult to injury, she claimed she pattered her Lois after my heroine Katharine Hepburn. *snort* Not even close, honey.
Anyway, Returns was okay. Spacey ruled, the effects were pretty cool, and for once, the precocious kid character didn't bother the hell out of me. But in the end, I'll stick with Superman and Superman II.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 01:24 am (UTC)I don't like Perry White much either, and I've been a Langella fan since Dracula.
And... Hepburn!? Bosworth wishes she could channel only one-one-thousandth of Hepburn's chops.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 01:57 am (UTC)"Bosworth used Hollywood great Katharine Hepburn as the inspiration for her portrayal of Lois Lane in Superman Returns.
She says, "I watched a lot of Katharine Hepburn to prepare for Lois, particularly The Philadephia Story and Guess Who's Coming to Dinner. Hepburn is a great model for how I see Lois - strong but fragile."
I hate to break it to her, but watching Katharine Hepburn to channel her is like me watching Yo-Yo Ma to learn cello. Oy.
But hang in there, Tom...Spacey's scene with the krypo-shiv is pretty damn cool to watch...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 04:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 01:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 01:39 am (UTC)And as for Miss Bosworth having the unmitigated gall to compare herself with La Hepburn...well, my Songbird is a Hepburn fan from way back (being both a Philly girl and an alumna of Hepburn's alma mater, Bryn Mawr) and will probably laugh that one right out of town.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 02:08 am (UTC)Regarding Brandon Routh, it's unfair to ask him to be Christopher Reeve, but that's exactly what the producers and director and the writers were asking of him. The film company tried to make lightning strike twice, to bring to an iconic character that same living warmth that was managed by Chris Reeve. It seems to me that they didn't attempt to fill the boots with someone who could be Superman but someone who could be Reeve, and that wasn't fair to the legacy of either icon. Routh didn't have the screen presence to be Chris Reeve. He didn't convey the confidence and do-goodery of Big Blue, the hapless positivity of Clark Kent, or the warmth of either. He was simply a look-alike, and that's not what the legacy of the film series needed.
I suspect we will need to suffer through another film with Bosworth and Routh. It's unlikely that Bosworth will suit herself to the role. She's too convinced of her own ability, based on her comments about attempting to ape the style of Ms. Hepburn. Routh is still new enough that he might realize that we need to see more than just a stand-in wearing a suit. We need to see the emotions inside the invincible flesh. However, either way, I suspect that Routh won't be the only actor we see in the suit. Michael Keaton wasn't the only Batman in the last fifteen years, was he? Routh may only be the first of several Supermen to come. For now... despite his failings, there are moments, like the plane rescue, where I am lost in the moment, giggling so I won't cry, because I am watching the hero of heroes, Big Blue himself, in the flesh.
Maybe the sequel will be better...
Date: 2007-02-20 02:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 02:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 02:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 04:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 02:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 03:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 03:31 am (UTC)And the more you get through the film, the more you will dislike it. The reasons for liking this incarnation of Kal-El decrease as time goes on. None of the reasons anyone would have for liking him, that you recall from the comics, are present in this film.
They could have made a more exciting film entitled "Melvin Furbish, Super Accountant, Does His Laundry And Peeks At His Landlady Mrs. Frump" with the same script.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 03:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 04:00 am (UTC)I, however, agree with the dislike for not only Kate Bosworth in the film but how her role was written. I don't think I need to get into details here as the point is likely well hit multiple places across the web.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 05:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 05:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 12:27 pm (UTC)Most of the rest was meh.
And I hated the ending.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 07:40 pm (UTC)I haven't seen it yet, and don't ever plan to, unless there's a serious re-edit/directors cut/version which wrings all the suck out.
Too bad I'll be missing a good Kevin Spacey performance, but even Gene Hackman's clownish Lex Luthor detracted from the originals, in my opinion.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-21 12:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-20 11:53 pm (UTC)The bit with the dogs was weird, and the subplot with the kid annoyed me and hurt my head. The only non-Spacey scene I got into was the plane scene. That was fun. But, the characters were bland and there was entirely too much bitching and moaning going on. Plus, nothing really happened. There was nothing that changed between the start of the movie and the end, aside from the stupid kid plot.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-03 11:21 pm (UTC)