Rose And The Doctor
Feb. 25th, 2007 05:28 pmI have finally finished catching up with Doctor Who. Finished watching "Doomsday".
Broke my freakin' heart.
Sorry, but not even Sara Jane had me like Rose Tyler has me.
'Sfunny. The plots of the last several episodes didn't grab me all that much on one level -- I mean, the Devil? The Devil? Excuses for The Doctor to have to take on Daleks and Cybermen in the same episode? On the other hand, a lot of the stuff -- particularly the single-minded machinations of Torchwood -- made perfect sense. And it all certainly unfolded well, with the possible exception of Horrors! The TARDIS is gone! We know it'll be back. Don't even.
But the big thing, in all cases, was the characterization. And the dialogue. Who could've predicted, from seeing the first Eccleston episode, how cool Mickey and alternate Pete and even Jackie would become? Let alone how cool Rose would become. She stared down Daleks, man.
So. Apparently the third season has a new companion. How long, ya think, before they breach the "impossible", impassable Void a third time and bring back Rose?
Broke my freakin' heart.
Sorry, but not even Sara Jane had me like Rose Tyler has me.
'Sfunny. The plots of the last several episodes didn't grab me all that much on one level -- I mean, the Devil? The Devil? Excuses for The Doctor to have to take on Daleks and Cybermen in the same episode? On the other hand, a lot of the stuff -- particularly the single-minded machinations of Torchwood -- made perfect sense. And it all certainly unfolded well, with the possible exception of Horrors! The TARDIS is gone! We know it'll be back. Don't even.
But the big thing, in all cases, was the characterization. And the dialogue. Who could've predicted, from seeing the first Eccleston episode, how cool Mickey and alternate Pete and even Jackie would become? Let alone how cool Rose would become. She stared down Daleks, man.
So. Apparently the third season has a new companion. How long, ya think, before they breach the "impossible", impassable Void a third time and bring back Rose?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:47 pm (UTC)For one thing, I hate when people cheapen tragic endings.
For another, I imagine they'd bring her back with a different actress, and that would suck. =(
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:55 pm (UTC)Wow, I hadn't thought of that. Holy...that would be bloody marvelous.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-27 07:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 08:52 pm (UTC)I'm only watching them as they're aired over here, so I haven't seen "The Runaway Bride" yet. But as much as I love Rose and Jackie and Mickey (though not so much either version of Mr. Tyler), I'm looking forward to a new companion. I'm interested in the inevitable comparison with Rose - not by the fans, but by the Doctor himself.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 10:58 pm (UTC)Jack is another story, especially since he's still doing BBC science fiction playing the same character. Have you seen any Torchwood?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:27 pm (UTC)Don't actually know when that is. I should look that up.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:46 am (UTC)Now I definitely want to know what you think.
(I know how you feel with the CFT. Especially since I plunked down...let's just say "a lot" for anime last weekend.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 01:02 am (UTC)Exactly. I don't blame you for being completely shot of time for such frivolity as watching TV, even good TV. (No one has time for bad TV.)
Incidentally, does the list of "what's taking up Tom's formerly-free time" include a cover art image for iTom 2.0: Transitions? Sorry, but I'm thorough about that...the only albums in my collection without cover images are, well, iTom 2.0, the incomplete iTom 3.0, and the first FuMP album, which is marked "The FuMP Disc 1" until I learn the real name.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 01:10 am (UTC)Other time-sinks include tricky commission work, crisising for friends, family stuff, minimal cleaning (I really have to do a Full Spring Cleaning number on this dump), creating a web page for a friend (and getting paid for it, mind), and more business phone calls than I ever imagined.
Also remember that I happily gave up TV, what, about four years ago now, when the DSL price/speed ratio got to an acceptable level and I could dump ComCrap. Anything I really need to watch, I can download or buy on DVD. And if I end up being behind the curve on stuff... well, I can live with that.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 01:15 am (UTC)Very cool.
Also remember that I happily gave up TV, what, about four years ago now, when the DSL price/speed ratio got to an acceptable level and I could dump ComCrap.
Huh. I actually did not know that--but it explains why you didn't get hooked on Heroes like the rest of us.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 01:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 01:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 03:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 09:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:04 pm (UTC)Plus, I rather expect Billie Piper doesn't want to come back :).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:08 pm (UTC)Which is probably a good thing -- I adore Rose to bits, but Companions aren't supposed to stay around too long.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:16 pm (UTC)Dear god. Never, I hope.
Look, I love Rose. She was a great companion. But her story is over. Her arc is complete. Bringing her back would be....so phenominally wrong that I have no words to express it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 01:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:17 pm (UTC)Rarely does a TV show bring tears to my eyes, but the Doctor has managed it time and again. This one brought on a full fit of crying.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:27 pm (UTC)When did Doctor Who start reaching out and grabbing you by the emotions, anyway?
(Don't worry - that's a rhetorical question - I know the answer...)
Maybe
Date: 2007-02-25 11:37 pm (UTC)Re: Maybe
Date: 2007-02-27 01:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 10:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-27 01:30 am (UTC)Girl in the Fireplace is another great example, yes. So is Eccleston's Father's Day - I knew how the story had to end when Rose saved her dad, and it *still* got me. It was a very well done predictable story. That's why I like Dalek better - except for "ELEVATE", I knew that trick from McCoy's Dalek story, this Dalek was not only a true badass, the story kept taking turns in directions I wasn't expecting. And *that* story got me, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:28 pm (UTC)And just that one Ood saying in his proper British accent...
Ood: "His armies will rise up and wage war against God."
Rose: "I'm sorry, what?"
*Ood smacks his translater a couple times*
Ood: "Would you like some sauce with that?"
Or something to that effect. Had me cracking up.
And I agree that the Dalek Vs. Cybermen thing was a little contrived but I enjoyed the hell out of it.
Cyberman: "You have declared war against the Cybermen."
Dalek: "This is not war. This is PEST CONTROL!"
That needs to be on a shirt.
And yeah, awesome ending. Awesome character development. They really didn't do that much in the first series, although they started to with Ace.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-25 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:14 am (UTC)Dalek: "This is not war. This is PEST CONTROL!"
That wasn't the line that sold me. Mickey had that one: "My god, it's like Stephen Hawking meets the speaking clock!"
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 02:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:15 am (UTC)It works a bit better if you think of it as a Lovecraft tribute.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:17 am (UTC)Do try to see some Torchwood. It's a bit (ok, a lot) darker than Who, but most of the 1st season episodes are fantastic.
Doom, doom, doom and gloom...
Date: 2007-02-26 03:07 am (UTC)And I know I'm alone in this, but I think putting so much emotional oomph into the Rose arc was a mistake (one of many): either no companion will ever be that special again, which will be a huge letdown, or every companion will be that special, which will cheapen Rose by comparison. There was a fundamental misunderstanding at the outset about what Doctor Who needed to be about, and it's weakened the show ever since.
I know it's brilliant. But it could have been so much better.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 03:26 am (UTC)But months later, I don't think so. I think The Doctor would say...what has become Ten's signature phrase...
"I'm sorry...I'm so sorry."
Would it have been cruel? Yep. But it seems so like The Doctor. Even if he did fall in love with a woman, he'd never tell her.
I enjoyed the banter between the Cybermen and Daleks. And someone made a funny skit about it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 07:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-27 07:28 am (UTC)I lay down and cried for a good 15-20 minutes nonstop at least.
I'd watched the last few eps with fear at the back of my mind, knowing that all Companions have to go away, all Companions have to lose him sooner or later, and watched with this dread hanging over me... was this going to be it? How were they going to do it.
I asked
I thought about this a lot both before and after. I described it to Fishy and he didn't feel the same dread-- never had, all the years he's watched the show-- it hadn't even occurred to him.
I realized something then. I'd felt this way not because I'd grown attached to Rose, but because I'd identified with Rose. And Fishy... he'd always identified with the Doctor.
That's kinda when it hit me that I had to write "Companion". :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-27 02:16 pm (UTC)