Hee Hee! Go, Appalachian State
Sep. 3rd, 2007 09:48 amApparently, my "beloved" Michigan Wolverines made history this weekend.
I used to love sports; now I hate them. No, hate's way too strong. I don't care about the scores; they're only games. I care about the lack of safety, and the lack of perspective. I understand people's need to focus on sports teams, to even do so to the point of ignoring the many, many more important things going on in the Real World. Bluntly, the biggest effect sports have on my life at this point is whether or not I can get parking near my place on a game day.
I am so fucking amused at everyone's reactions to this.
What, if any, are yours?
I used to love sports; now I hate them. No, hate's way too strong. I don't care about the scores; they're only games. I care about the lack of safety, and the lack of perspective. I understand people's need to focus on sports teams, to even do so to the point of ignoring the many, many more important things going on in the Real World. Bluntly, the biggest effect sports have on my life at this point is whether or not I can get parking near my place on a game day.
I am so fucking amused at everyone's reactions to this.
What, if any, are yours?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 02:15 pm (UTC)First came Jackie Robinson. #42 before Douglas Adams was even born.
Then in 1987 asked Doug Williams at Media day, "How long have you been a black Quarterback?". No, I am no making this up.
And conversely, 15 years later, nobody informing Rush Limbaugh that everyone besides him new black QB's could succeed at the pro level and him embarrassing himself off of ESPN.
Heck, your man Keith Olbermann got famous on ESPN.
This week as been watching a USA Basketball program recover its work ethic in Fiba America.
I learn what motivates successes (Montana, Favre [look what he did the day after his dad died]), and failures (Desmond Howard, Tony Mandarich).
Its a level of visibility on people doing their jobs and there is much to learn from it.
Seriously Tom. Google for "Gregg Easterbrook, Tuesday Morning Quarterback". He's a brookings scholar with a sports column but he deviates to politics, reader-mail (all in haiqu) and Science Fiction and tell me it's not some of the most entertaining and insightful stuff you've read in years. Just what he said about Michael Vick gave me a ton of pause.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 02:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 02:39 pm (UTC)the Big Ten has been overrated for decades, and Notre Dame is even worse as far as overrated.
its high time the 1-AA schools get the recognition they deserve, and the BCS teams.... waaaaaaah
sorry to rant Tom, its just I am sick and tired of the excuses for why there isnt a true national champion in Division 1A football.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 02:47 pm (UTC)And my reaction was "WTF?!?"
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 09:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 02:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 03:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 03:38 pm (UTC)I admit to being amused by the debate on ESPN Radio last night as to whether the ultimate SportsCenter of the night ought to have led with the football or the no-hitter by Boston Red Sox rookie Craig Buchholz. I wish they could have put as much energy into debating something substantive.
As to the game itself, I'm both pleased to see the result. And unsurprised; "on any given day" [the worst team in the league can beat the best]. (Can't quite quote exactly from memory, and can't find the actual original. I'm sure someone here will deliver.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 03:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 04:26 pm (UTC)I enjoy watching Red Sox baseball, the same way I enjoy reading Harry Turtledove or Fables, the same way I enjoy, say, filk. (Actually, I enjoy filk more these days, since I'm a participant rather than just a spectator.) I'm outside the Boston market, and I don't spend money on sat-TV or on MLB.com in order to watch the whole season -- just the ones that make it on the ESPN family (and on YES when they play the Yanks) is enough for me. Baseball as a whole I find kind of a relaxing, decompressing game to watch.
Aside from that, my interest in sports ranges from minor interest to nil. I'll watch maybe one or two football games a year. I'll watch a bit of a hockey game just because I like the visual flow of movement on the ice. I can only really get interested in basketball if I see a game live, and I haven't done that for nearly 20 years -- with basketball, my interest is inversely proportional to the level of professionalism; I like high-school basketball but the pro level bores me. (The rampant egos and occasional thuggery don't help.) And golf? No. I do enjoy watching the Olympics, though it's not necessarily the competition so much as the nature of the event that interests me.
Any rate, cliche corner: To each his own. But I'm agreed that if Other People's Games become one's all-consuming passion, something's mighty wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 04:31 pm (UTC)I've never had much patience for sports--it was the athletes who humiliated me as a kid, so it doesn't bother me to see one side of a sporting match humiliated, except that it means it'll go to the heads of the athletes on the other side.
Bah, humbug on the whole thing. I'm still irritated that two years as a University of Michigan student managed to infuse an irrational sense in my head that a perfectly fine institution of higher learning, Ohio State University, was somehow intrinsically evil.
Let's all go make music and rocketships instead.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 04:31 pm (UTC)And I love the fact that any given Saturday, magic can happen. A few years back, my sister's alma mater (UC Davis) was playing my school's arch rival (Stanford). UCD was transitioning into I-AA from Division II, and were technically not a I-AA school yet despite playing a I-AA schedule. There was no TV of the game -- Jill and I had to follow the Yahoo ticker to keep track of what was going on. But the screaming that happened when UC Davis did the impossible and took down Stanford? It's something I'll never forget. There's always power in the Davids taking down the Goliaths.
Which means that I am happy for the guys that represent Appalachian State. To go in and snatch victory from one of the best college football programs in the country, in said program's home stadium, is really the best of all possible worlds.
-kat
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 04:36 pm (UTC)Yet who got all of the pep rallies? Who got all the newspaper coverage? Who got inflated grades? Who were treated as heroes? Who got to ignore the rules (and even laws sometimes) when they were inconvenient?
This more than anything else convinced me sports was a waste of time. A close second was that every time I watch a sport, of any kind, I keep asking myself "Why am I watching instead of playing?"
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 07:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 04:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 05:22 pm (UTC)I was favorably influenced in my choice of graduate school by the fact that the football stadium was on the other side of the river from the rest of the school and the team couldn't play worth toofee. Unfortunately, they started winning about six years later, and now they have a huge fan base and people move here to be their fans, and just try driving anywhere midtown on game day. It would be a better college town if they'd stayed nonentities, but I do my best to ignore it.
It also bugs me that athletes get more money than scientists, and behave like pinatahead toejam cretins in public when they know they're role models for the children.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 07:38 pm (UTC)We're talking about people who get paid obscene amounts of money to play children's games.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 05:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 05:40 pm (UTC)Um. Okay, so it sounds like someplace in Michigan has a team called the Wolverines, who won a game of some kind--maybe football?. Anyway, okay, whatever.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 06:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 07:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 07:33 pm (UTC)You don't follow sports. They aren't important to you. Cool. Fine.
But for some of us, they are important. I don't make fun of other peoples' interests and hobbies. Please show sports fans the same respect.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 02:06 am (UTC)Grin
Date: 2007-09-04 12:31 am (UTC)Re: Grin
Date: 2007-09-04 01:28 am (UTC)Shooting from the three-point line? Is that with a rifle or a longbow?
Re: Grin
Date: 2007-09-04 01:48 am (UTC)Re: Grin
Date: 2007-09-09 01:32 am (UTC)Genuine failure to understand joke failure to understand sports terms! I win! (Though I cheated by being from a country where basketball is only marginally more popular than sumo wrestling.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 06:16 pm (UTC)I love sports, and will watch pretty much anything. The big news 'round these parts this weekend was Cal getting revenge on Tennessee for last season's smack-down.
People love sports, and get attached to teams as a sort of tribal affiliation. Just check out my reaction to my beloved Giants winning the 2002 NL pennant (http://gridlore.livejournal.com/136915.html) and blowing their chance to win the World Series in Game 6 (http://gridlore.livejournal.com/144715.html).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 06:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 07:41 pm (UTC)I hate that.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 02:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 08:42 pm (UTC)My reaction to this reaction (http://mgoblog.blogspot.com/)? Extreme amusement.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-03 10:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 12:47 am (UTC)I think it's funny, though, that the Freep writer likened Michigan State's loss to Appalachian State to losing to the Washington Generals. Y'see, they used to be known for losing to the Harlem Globetrotters.
They were, um, a basketball team.
Anyhow, I'm glad Appalachian State won! This is man-bites-dog stuff in sports terms. And yes, I think the reaction from Michigan State, sportswriters, and die-hard fans is hilarious.
This is why I still follow sports. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 12:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 01:40 am (UTC)Today I have three big issues about professional sports.
1) Outrageous pay, and since I have cable I have to pay for part of it indirectly.
2) Favoritism. We've all seen it in the news so there's no need to repeat it.
3) It creates a false hope of a get rich quick scheme. Only a tiny fraction of one percent of the people who dream of playing professionally actually make it. The rest passed up their best chance to get an education and make something of themselves. Educational institutions that make their athletes learn a practical skill if sports doesn't pan out are the exception instead of the rule. Worse, this push to win at any cost leads to drug abuse and innocent people getting hurt or killed.
We shouldn't refer to professional sports players as athletes, we should call them sports entertainers like wrestlers on the WWE.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 01:49 am (UTC)I somewhat follow college football. I'm also aware that college sports bring two important things to an institution: name recognition and money.
What I'm having a hard time grokking is the notion that SF fans and sports fans are mutually exclusive sets. This expatriated Buffalonian still follows the Bills and Sabres when he can, because in Buffalo, that's the thing to do.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 02:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 03:15 am (UTC)I could give my reasoning for why the events of Saturday happened but as someone who can overwhelm people in the mundane world with my sports knowledge, I know it would get mostly ignored here.
I have a former coworker who is a huge Wolverine fan and I wonder how he is doing.
Within the past 5 years of being in fandom, sports has become not as dominant in my life. Being a fan of performers such as yourself, I can just enjoy it without worrying about who wins. That is the main reason I now take the time, energy and money I used to spend to bowl, play golf or scrabble to enjoy life as I wish I could have done more of when all I cared about in the past was how well I performed.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 04:59 pm (UTC)Here's my logic: Can you control the players? Can you control the outcome of the game? Are you the coach? Have you even played a single sport this year? On a team, or just at the playground, or gym for an hour or two? No, fantasy leagues don't count. You STILL don't control anything. Considering that you don't control a single aspect of the game, then SHUT UP about how they're playing it!
The same goes for anything on TV. You're not an actor, or writer, or producer, or station owner. You have no control, so shut up about the people who do.
I play sports when I feel like it. If I win, it's fun to brag about the scores. If I didn't win, I like to talk about the good plays that were made. I don't watch TV much at all, but I like to laugh at what's funny. Stupid doesn't really amuse me.
Oh, and if you are a sports player, or TV writer, or something like that, then you DO have control over what happens. So yes, you can complain then, but only about your own stuff. Let other people be "creative". Feel good about what they're doing. Because, after all, when they suck, they become a tremendous source of inspiration to all those who say "*I* can do better than THAT!!!"
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-04 10:16 pm (UTC)Oops.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-08 10:48 pm (UTC)The "jock culture" is certainly a blight on society.
And if we eliminated the sports programs from public schools we'd certainly free up a ridiculous amount of money for, oh, I don't know...EDUCATION maybe?