Must be so, if there's actual news time and space available to devote to this.
Give me a fucking break. This isn't even as bad as the Terrible Baseball Steroid Scandal that Congress spent actual time on yesterday, holding athletes and sports teams to far more stringent account than, oh, I dunno, our lying, warmongering president and his cronies.
Hahhhhhh.
So. What asinine "news" have you [headdesk]ed at lately?
Give me a fucking break. This isn't even as bad as the Terrible Baseball Steroid Scandal that Congress spent actual time on yesterday, holding athletes and sports teams to far more stringent account than, oh, I dunno, our lying, warmongering president and his cronies.
Hahhhhhh.
So. What asinine "news" have you [headdesk]ed at lately?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 03:19 pm (UTC)You mean there's another kind? =)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 03:34 pm (UTC)Not perhaps the kind of asinine news you intended, but considering that 1) it's a total lie and 2) it's being printed in newspapers all over the place, I figured it was relevant.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 04:07 pm (UTC)The unreasonable conclusion is that they actually READ. Mostly, they get their jollies by annoying people and watching the monkeys dance, on and off the internet. Anything for shock value.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 04:16 pm (UTC)...what are you referencing here? Whenever I've run into Anonymous on the web, they're rallied under the picture of the black business suit and tie.
"Mostly, they get their jollies by annoying people..."
Actually, I believe they get their 'jollies' nowadays from shutting down a manipulative, violent cult. I'm inclined to agree with them on the points that religious salvation should not cost upwards of two hundred thousand dollars and that people shouldn't die of neglect while in their church's care.
www.xenu.net and www.lisamcpherson.org are my sources here.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 04:39 pm (UTC)They're not devoted to the cause of shutting down a dangerous cult [although that's an attractive by-product at the moment]. They are just out for "lulz". They have targetted Furry conventions, Jewish groups and anybody who gets in their way. The Afro+Tuxedo look is a pastiche of Malcolm X and his followers. The big 70's afro hair and the hate rhetoric suggest to me that it's not sincere.
I suggest you have a look through EncyclopediaDramatica.com [preferably through an anonymous proxy or a public computer] and decide for yourself. Jolly rebels or hate mongers?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 05:06 pm (UTC)And while Anonymous may have started out like that, the Anonymous-anti-CoS movement no longer supports those things. There is an astonishing amount of emphasis being placed on being legal and being moral. (They hang out at enturbulation.org if you'd like to check it out for yourself.) They're taking the name of Anonymous in a new, positive direction. And yes, there are a certain amount within the group who are out for 'lulz'...law-abiding, moral lulz that consist of the cult falling apart as well as the inevitable references to lolcats or Rick Astley.
I'd also like to say that the afro wigs are mostly in place to cover up hair, since that's a distinguishing feature that could allow a Scientologist to identify a protester and harass them at home. (Like they did to Mark Bunker of xenutv.com as well as many, many others, especially Paulette Cooper who was the target of Scientology's Operation Freakout.) The wigs are also goofy, which is a big draw for the interweb crowd. If you have to cover your hair, why not look ridiculous at the same time?
I found a quote on the ED Project Chanology page that pretty much sums up the change in policy: "Every time /b/ has gone to war, it has been for our own causes. Now, gentlemen, we are going to fight for something that is right."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 05:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 05:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 06:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 06:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 10:38 pm (UTC)Whoever loses in the Anonymous/Scientology debacle, society wins, anyway. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 03:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 07:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 08:03 pm (UTC)Actually, the blond was arrested 2 days after, on her 18th birthday. She was arrested because this was a violation of her probation. Probation due to her aggravated assault on an ex-boyfriend. Charges for the theft are pending.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 08:33 pm (UTC)I work at San Jose's news radio station, and we used to simulcast CNN Headline News during prime weekday hours. Unfortunately, some of what is on CNNHN is ridiculous, such as when they went "wall to wall" with Britney Spears coverage. Eventually we started running CNN Radio and adding national and international stories from CNN and AP.
I thought
Date: 2008-02-14 10:48 pm (UTC)Re: I thought
Date: 2008-02-14 10:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 03:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 04:40 pm (UTC)[eta] Never mind, I get it - mainstream media.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 12:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 05:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 12:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 12:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 12:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 08:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 05:04 pm (UTC)"According to 2006 data compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 58.2 percent of all rear seat fatalities involved passengers who were not wearing seat belts, compared to 32.7 percent of fatalities for rear seat passengers who were wearing seat belts."
Which means 9.1% of all rear seat fatalities involved passengers in a Schroedinger-Cat state of both wearing seat belts and not wearing seat belts simultaneously!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 05:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 05:41 pm (UTC)Oh yeah, and Mel Gibson is complying with the terms of his parole. Or is it probation?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 08:40 pm (UTC)This story was all over San Francisco's radio and TV stations until the animal finally croaked.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 06:00 pm (UTC)But lately I was laughing at this little chestnut: "Prison Warden: "Drunken Orgies Tainted System."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 07:45 pm (UTC)Another thing I really hate about "news" these days is the indiscriminate mixing of substantive news -- you know, things that might actually affect public policy, or our lives -- with entertainment/gossip. I stopped watching the local news program when they started giving previews of each night's TV shows as if that were just as important as, say, how the legislature was spending our tax dollars.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 07:52 pm (UTC)(One of my best stick-in-a-quick-joke moments was when we went to see that show at The Power Center. The woman did the, er, climactic bit at the end, the audience applauded wildly, and just before the actress could continue with the wrap-up, I managed to slip in, "Encore!")
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 09:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 12:03 am (UTC)Never mind.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 12:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 12:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 12:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 01:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 09:44 pm (UTC)There was a proposal made to effect sweeping changes across the Armed Forces; that bring to light just how hilarious war must be... they're looking at scrapping the Active Duty retirement system, to line it up with the retirement systems of the rest of the federal gov't.
What we have now: After 20 years of active federal service, you are entitled to 50% pension that begins paying immediately upon retirement from the Armed Forces.
What was proposed: 10 years of service would be rewarded a retirement pension (percentages were not mentioned) that would begin paying out at the age of 62 (six months prior to that person drawing social security). 20 years of service would have a pension that would begin paying at the age of 60, 30 years of service would give you a pension starting at the age of 57.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-14 10:53 pm (UTC)http://www.cngr.gov/Final%20Report/CNGR_ExecutiveSummary.pdf
The retirement thing begins on page 50 (and the Army Times discreetly failed to include that those of us on the current retirement system would be grandfathered). Page 50, according to Adobe.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 01:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 02:05 am (UTC)The amazing thing this story has garnered 53 comments.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-15 06:39 am (UTC)