Navigation
Page Summary
unclelumpy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kightp.livejournal.com - (no subject)
markbernstein.livejournal.com - (no subject)
liddle-oldman.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lucywiggin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
annearchy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bigbumble.livejournal.com - Economic forcast
liddle-oldman.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Fluid Measure by
- Theme: Warm Embrace by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 05:02 pm (UTC)It's sad. It really is.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 06:21 pm (UTC)If you look at the report you would see that even most republicans disapprove of the shrub. Heck, if you could run Hillary against Bush right now she would likely win in a landslide.
But she would not be running against the shrub - she would be running against "another Republican" - and that makes all the difference.
What, do you expect that because people disapprove of how things are currently being done that they are suddenly going to make an about-face and radically change how they believe the country should be handled? That because W is an idiot suddenly a fiscal conservative should want to vote for someone for government sponsored health care?
Personally, I did not vote for W in either of the last two presidential elections - but I did not vote for Kerry or Gore either. Some would say I wasted my votes, but I refuse to vote against someone, I will only vote for someone I actually want for president. Hillary would have a very difficult time earning my vote, simply because I don't trust her. McCain and Obama I am undecided on, I'll just have to see how I feel as we get closer to the election.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 08:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 10:19 pm (UTC)I imagine they would be disillusioned, disappointed and perhaps have their faith shaken, if that's what you mean.
Some would say I wasted my votes, but I refuse to vote against someone, I will only vote for someone I actually want for president.
Good for you. But I'm afraid that makes you the exception, not the rule.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 11:41 pm (UTC)Good for you. But I'm afraid that makes you the exception, not the rule.
I know, but I have my principles to live up to. (There are times I wish I could go back in time and teach the founding fathers about game theory so we could have another voting system that wouldn't inevitably devolve into a two party system)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 05:36 pm (UTC)What a surprise.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 06:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 11:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 06:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 06:49 pm (UTC)I'm hoping that the recent election in Australia is a harbinger for the U.S. The voters there tossed Dubya's BFF John Howard out on his ass, and the new Prime Minister is hard at work trying to undo the damage of Howard's pro-Bush and otherwise rightwing policies.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-21 03:40 am (UTC)Seems to me that, even if he's espousing similar, misguided policies, he isn't relating them to the current lame turkey buzzard.
Though I will have to consider this point.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 08:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-21 03:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 06:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 06:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 07:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 08:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-21 08:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 10:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 11:17 pm (UTC)*runs away quick, grinning*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-20 09:39 pm (UTC)Economic forcast
Date: 2008-02-21 12:12 am (UTC)Several of the monetary protections put in place as a response to the 1930's depression have been removed since 1980. One that comes to mind is that banks are now, once again, allowed to sell securities. It looks like that is beginning to bite them in the but.
Re: Economic forcast
Date: 2008-02-21 12:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-21 03:49 am (UTC)