Doctor Who Spoiler Thread
Apr. 3rd, 2010 09:34 pmSeason Five has begun, and I have to admit Matt Smith carried it off. He wasn't the wonderment that was David Tennant, at least not yet, but he carried himself rather better than I anticipated given the previews. The new companion is adorable (and, bluntly, has incredible legs). Fun stuff all around, lots of good lines. The only real problems I had were the food sequence at the beginning (yep, got it, he's alien, goin' through changes, GOT IT awready) and the character of the doctor in the coma ward (jeez wotta beyotch). And it was kinda cruel to have Amelia wait ten twelve fourteen years, but it does seem to have made her proper companion material.
Thoughts? Your mileage may vary. Especially, I anticipate, in the case of
smallship1. ;)
Thoughts? Your mileage may vary. Especially, I anticipate, in the case of
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 02:04 am (UTC)Amelia's smart and ballsy. What more could you ask in a companion? (The fact that she's gorgeous is pure gravy.) (That she's redheaded is perhaps rubbing in the whole "Doctor wants to be ginger" thing a bit hard, though :-) But don't construe that as a complaint in any way from this quarter.)
I wonder if the swimming pool randomly moves throughout the TARDIS, or if it got temporarily mislocated in the landing. If the former, when's the worst possible time for it to land in the control room? I expect to see it there, then.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 02:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 02:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 02:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 04:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 02:56 am (UTC)Love Amelia Pond.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 03:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 10:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 03:58 am (UTC)Even more abbreviated than in my own LJ
Date: 2010-04-04 04:21 am (UTC)Must stop making promises to little girls and then standing them up. :: looks slightly askance at Teh Moff ::
Doctor, the CONSOLE ROOM is ON FIRE.
Cloister bell! (It is probably bad that my response to it is at least as much *squeee* as OHSHIT
BEARSAPOCALYPSE.)Not sure yet what I think of Amy; we got enough of her, and yet didn't. It is odd.
The Doctor is decidedly the Doctor, certainly as much as he's ever been at the end of a first story. After several years of Oncoming Storm this and Lonely God that, I'm giving a big thumbs-up to the directness of "Basically? Run."
I'm on board with everything about the new console except for the fact that the base structure appears to be made of some obscure sort of cheese.
Bottom line: I have been delivered a perfectly adequate quantity of squeee.
Re: Even more abbreviated than in my own LJ
Date: 2010-04-04 12:18 pm (UTC)No, I think that's standard response for any long term fans when something obscure shows up in the new series. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 04:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 06:08 am (UTC)I liked Matt Smith's performance, but I'm not entirely sure he's The Doctor to me yet. He's certainly earned the chance to convince me, though.
Fricken' awesome creepy alien, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 07:01 am (UTC)Didn't love: the Leverage-style camera tricks showing how the Doctor "figured it out". I hope that isn't going to happen in every episode. Ugh. And yeah, the food thing went on a bit too long.
Can't wait to watch it again with my kids - hopefully tomorrow, if the relatives leave us in peace for a while.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 07:29 am (UTC)Okay. There are things about nuWho I haven't liked from the outset, and one of the worst was exemplified in the whole "five minutes"/"twelve years" business, which I predicted from the trailer and shouldn't have been able to. Gratuitous cruelty, particularly to children, is a bit of a turn-off for me, and I preferred it when the vagaries of the TARDIS were a matter for rueful joking or a spur for unexpected adventure rather than a cause of heartbreak. Also I don't like the Doctor being the bad guy, another thing the writers of nuWho have insisted on plugging away at from the beginning. Mysterious, yes. Powerful, yes. Cruel to kids, no.
Food scene, too much. Mucb too much. Plot, recycled from two old episodes. Villain, flashy CGI eel thing that does nothing but pull faces and talk menacingly (what's it guilty of? Does anyone care?). Arc hint thuds into place with dreary predictability at precisely the usual point in the proceedings, and why does the thing that has been opened, or is to be opened, have to be called the Pandoricum? Clankingly obvious much?
The Doctor. For me, he's too young for that character. The Doctor's a father figure, an uncle figure, an older man (and let's not start swapping numbers; there's a clear divide, character-wise, between "younger man" and "older man" and the characterisation in nuWho is definitely the former, whereas in realWho it was the latter. Tennant couldn't play "older man" and so the writers had to resort to shoving in lines about how old he is whenever possible. Smith can't play "older man" either; the best he can manage is "young fogey" which will just look silly in the long run.
Otherwise, we've gone from Salford brickie through Peckham double-glazing salesman to geography teacher from West Dulwich (the less posh end), which is at least moving in the right direction. Maybe the next Doctor but one will manage to achieve Time Lord from Gallifrey. The fact that, on current projections, he'll be played by a nine-year-old is just one of those things.
There is much to like here, as there was, infuriatingly, with nuWho mark one. Some lines made us laugh, the return of the infinite TARDIS is cheering even though the console room still looks like a workshop and not the safe place I remember it being, and Amy might end up being less abrasive than Donna, though I do not trust Moffat not to pull out the unresolved sexual tension stop yet again.
I see we have further demonisation of Winston Churchill, and by extension us, to look forward to. Daleks with Union Jacks on. Oh joy. I wonder how reminiscent that episode will be of Rob Shearman's "Jubilee," already plundered by the man himself for "Dalek"? One thing this episode has not shown any sign of is originality of storytelling. Maybe that will change.
I'll be watching.
Oh yes; revamped music not as good, title sequence hard to read even for me, impossible for the Countess. Somebody didn't think about colour values.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 01:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 11:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 01:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 01:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 02:50 pm (UTC)Ms Pond is pure companion material, and cute too.
The new opening is.. meh.
And the new TARDIS interior is rather Steam Punky, rolling with the times, but its nice to see they are remembering that there is more to the inside and I'm HOPING we'll delve deeper.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 06:40 pm (UTC)So can Amy. Definitely. Though I do hope she goes back to Amelia at some point.
So can the new TARDIS oh you sexy thing.
I ... could take or leave the new title sequence, but I don't hate the new logo.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 10:28 pm (UTC)I wonder if Amy's unseen Aunt will be important later on. I do like this starts a new series-long mystery (the cracks in the universe). I think the series goes better when it has an arc to move the individual episodes forwards.
Oh yeah, and what is it with the Doctor stealing female companions right before their wedding? :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-04 10:34 pm (UTC)Also I love that Moffat and Smith both admit that Doctor/TARDIS is the OTP of the series. ;)