Mission Accomplished
May. 1st, 2008 09:48 amIt's all over the blogosphere, and even the mainstream media, so I'm not even gonna bother with a link: Today is the fifth anniversary of Dubya declaring "Major combat operations in Iraq are over".
Our entire country has been broken because of these bastards. Military, economy, treasury, reputation, etc., etc., etc., etc. The only thing BushCo has ever cared about is money and power for its loyalists -- a sick dream of American empire on the broken bodies of anybody stupid enough to get between the neoconservatives and their "rightful" plunder. And they're likely to get out of office, if they don't finish suspending the Constitution before the election, with their money and their power and the huzzahs of a fawning mass media and adoring punditry, rather than the criminal charges and war crimes trials they deserve.
Unless, of course, you think we're better off than we were eight years ago? Four years? One?
Anybody here still think anybody in the Bush administration has done anything right? Please provide links.
Our entire country has been broken because of these bastards. Military, economy, treasury, reputation, etc., etc., etc., etc. The only thing BushCo has ever cared about is money and power for its loyalists -- a sick dream of American empire on the broken bodies of anybody stupid enough to get between the neoconservatives and their "rightful" plunder. And they're likely to get out of office, if they don't finish suspending the Constitution before the election, with their money and their power and the huzzahs of a fawning mass media and adoring punditry, rather than the criminal charges and war crimes trials they deserve.
Unless, of course, you think we're better off than we were eight years ago? Four years? One?
Anybody here still think anybody in the Bush administration has done anything right? Please provide links.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:04 pm (UTC)Maybe President Obama will have them rounded up and sent to the Hague next year. A man can dream.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 05:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:09 pm (UTC)The sad part is that I suspect they aren't even any good at looting and plundering, at least in the sense of getting away with retiring on some remnants of the loot after your piracy days are done.
I think all that misappropriated $$ has ended up in the pocket of third world warlords and smugglers, scattered to the winds, not even of use to the guys who stole it. (Halliburton, dumb schmucks of Wall Street...)
Further, IMHO they're really not very good at power, either. If they were, we'd never notice what they were doing, it'd be a done deal and no shouting, things would just continue to run smoothly while pumping just the right amount of lolly into their pockets, not too much, not hogging so much that it breaks the whole con game. Again, dumb.
The fact that they gum up the works so badly and make the rest of the the whole machine break down is just a little-discussed part of what's so infuriating.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:26 pm (UTC)Some of them have resigned. Does that count?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:40 pm (UTC)I don't blame Bush for the economy tanking. It is often attributed to his fault because of the war and other factors. The fact is, the circustamces that attributed to the war (something I went into depth into on one of my last three LJ entries if your curious) have been around for some time. The economy is a beast of its own nature.
However, I do blame Bush for not doing anything about it. The warning signs have been around for long enough that action could have been taken on it. The war has also tied most of Bush's hands when it comes to the economy as well. You can't improve the economy if you have every cent you don't have going to a pointless war. Bush has turned his back on Americans and favors corporations. They get bail outs and tax cuts, we get jack. I'm also sure that somehow Bush is raking a fortune off of the oil thing but the "follow the money" principle.
I don't really blame Bush for causing the economy to tank. I blame corporate greed. It just happens that Bush is a product of corporate greed and happens to be best buddies with them. That is almost as bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:48 pm (UTC)The Emperor Has No Flight Suit
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:52 pm (UTC)Other than that, no, Bush has done nothing good.
-L.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-02 12:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 02:59 pm (UTC)On a purely personal level, despite what this administration has done, I might actually be better off (looking forwards) now than 8 years, 4 years, or 1 year ago:
- May 1, 2000 — My company was going through round three of layoffs and like Donna Summer I managed to survive. I got hit in round four in October and spent the next 9.5 months out of work.
- May 1, 2004 — In my fourteenth or fifteenth month of unemployment since the January 2003 layoffs (not counting the 1- and 2-day consulting gigs or the 5-week backfill). I do get a job at month-end, though.
- May 1, 2007 — Employed by a bank as the economy begins to tank noticeably and the subprime lending debacle begins to make itself known. Wind up getting let go 4 months later and spend about 8 months out of work.
Now, despite having to go into the hole on the calendar year (most of which amounts to the jobhunting expenses of the CA, IN, MI, and NY trips and the unreimbursed part of the moving expenses, all of which can be deducted from my 2008 taxes next April), odds are I'll be in a more stable IT job (it is in an educational institution instead of corporate Amerikkka, after all) with a certain degree of layoff protection, at least after the 6-month probation is over with.I WIll Survive
Date: 2008-05-01 03:35 pm (UTC)Nate
Re: I WIll Survive
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 03:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 03:04 pm (UTC)That means that 30% of the country is not paying attention.
No, the administration has never done one good, right, or moral thing. I long ago said that Chimpy is way past Warren Harding bad and well into Nehemiah Scudder bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 03:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 03:25 pm (UTC)I will agree with
Am I doing better? Oddly enough, at this moment, signs are positive, but only because I moved to a lower cost-of-living area of the country, cut my monthly rent to under half of what my mortgage was, and still managed to find a job that is near enough to parity with my previous job in pay that the difference doesn't really matter.
No thanks to BushCo.
(Edited to get hanabishirecca's name right, and to clarify one sentence.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 03:34 pm (UTC)You may not think it was worth the cost, but the Kurds are a lot better off and the rescue of the marshes that Saddam Hussein had drained was a tremendous ecological win.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 08:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 03:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 03:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 08:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 03:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:10 pm (UTC)Now: Broke and miserable.
Nope, can't say is better, really.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:13 pm (UTC)Although we have only just come out from eleven years of the same conservative government (and the same guy in the hot seat), which is a relief. At least your lot gets to boot idiots out of the hot seat after eight years.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:23 pm (UTC)Better off than 8 years ago? No way
4 years ago? Only because my DH, who was unemployed for 3 years thanks to the tanking of the U.S computer programming industry, started his own business, at which he works at least 60 hours a week.
One year ago? No, not really.
Anybody here still think anybody in the Bush administration has done anything right? Please provide links.
. . . . *crickets*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:28 pm (UTC)more money, perhaps, just, but then the cost of living has gone up, so more or less the same place.
less hope, more cynicism, less dreams, more wisdom, less faith, more knowledge...
Overall... older, maybe wiser, and certainly less faith in humanity. [but then I've met more humans].
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 05:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:56 pm (UTC)If I think about it for a while I may be able to come up with a few more. They're all down in the weeds, and they're nowhere near the magnitude of the fsck-ups, but even a blind pig finds the occasional acorn.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:57 pm (UTC)I think the estate-tax repeal was a good idea (although it has its downsides). The tax comes back in 2011 anyway.
Medicare Part D is horribly flawed, but some people have prescription drug coverage that didn't before.
They managed not to get into a war with Libya (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12799651/), although that was probably largely because of British and French pressure.
Their AIDS program in Africa might actually be accomplishing constructive things (http://cl-bloggers.blogspot.com/2008/02/bush-administrations-success-story-in.html).
As profoundly as they bungled Katrina, the Administration has done some good with international food aid -- for example, after the earthquakes in Indonesia and Pakistan (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7543055).
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-02 04:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 04:59 pm (UTC)Well, there is that $600 tax rebate check thing. In my book, anybody who gives me 600 bucks isn't all bad. Of course, the way the economy's going, most of it will be going to pay bills or stay in my bank account for a rainy day. Really, I'll be lucky if I can even spend $100 of it on anything cool.
But that's the cheeseball
Date: 2008-05-01 05:34 pm (UTC)At one time I was hoping that Bush would be the president who fixed the immigration mess (the one area where he broke with the standard party line.) But alas.
I'd rather have a stable economy and my original California job, instead of the "tax-rebate-can-we-buy-the-election" sop.
Re: But that's the cheeseball
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-01 05:06 pm (UTC)I'm having to read that one in small chunks because I'm at work and it's both pissing me off and making me cry. Mostly because so many genuinely good people have to clean up the mess Dubya's making without any good coming of it.
and, noted in that article...
Date: 2008-05-01 08:39 pm (UTC)HERE (http://www.esquire.com/features/things-that-carried-him-5) (part 5, dealing with flying the body back):
After lodging a complaint with the Army and receiving help from California senator Barbara Boxer, the Holleys saw their son met by an honor guard instead. Still angry, they began a campaign to change the way all military dead would be delivered. California representative Duncan Hunter, then chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, wrote legislation that eventually became known as the Holley Provision to the 2007 Defense Authorization Act. It directed that the bodies of fallen soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines would no longer be booked passage on US Airways, Delta, Northwest, or Continental but would be flown on military or military-contracted flights and met by honor guards.
Meaning, the military dead would no longer be freight on commercial airlines, but transported with more than a modicum of respect.
Re: and, noted in that article...
From: