Superb news: Massachusetts is getting ready to make it legal for gay couples who live out-of-state to get married in Massachusetts.
Once again: If you think that how, or who, other people of legal standing and mutual consent conduct their relationships affects you in any way, you are either wrong or a part (or former part, or wanna be part) of that relationship. More simply, two guys kissin' will not ruin your life unless you want/used to be in that smooch. Not your biz, not your prob. If it is, it has nothing to do with gender; it has to do with the people.
ETA: Jeez. Semantics. Gotta spell out ever-damn-thing for people. ;)
Once again: If you think that how, or who, other people of legal standing and mutual consent conduct their relationships affects you in any way, you are either wrong or a part (or former part, or wanna be part) of that relationship. More simply, two guys kissin' will not ruin your life unless you want/used to be in that smooch. Not your biz, not your prob. If it is, it has nothing to do with gender; it has to do with the people.
ETA: Jeez. Semantics. Gotta spell out ever-damn-thing for people. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 06:19 pm (UTC)What I think interesting would be if a married CA couple moves to New York, and then CA passes (I hope not) the revocation act. Would NY consider them still married?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 05:52 pm (UTC)Experimental Sandboxes
Date: 2008-07-31 05:55 pm (UTC)The law means that in 2004, the other states didn't have to worry so much that the queers in MA would storm their cities in pink camo and make all the men into sex slaves, or that all their women would suddenly realize how much nicer it would be to be married to a nice MA woman instead of the Neanderthal they were currently with (or whatever else it was that the rabid anti-gay voters were afraid of.)
Mind you, now that CA allows same-sex marriage, the cat is out of the bag, so MA may as well share in the marriage-vacation business.
Re: Experimental Sandboxes
Date: 2008-08-01 12:11 am (UTC)Hell, they didn't try this back when people were fighting interracial marriages (not all that long ago).
BTW, the arguments against gay marriage are almost word for word the same ones used against interracial marriages (except for the obvious word substitutions)
Classic example is "They are free to marry anyone they want as long as that person is of the [same race/opposite sex]."
Re: Experimental Sandboxes
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 06:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 06:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 06:08 pm (UTC)Why? Try reading this.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 06:23 pm (UTC)It was hard, for me, because the man is -without question- a brilliant author. And, truthfully, I usually try to divorce the person from the beliefs if their art -separate from their personal philosophy or theology- enriches the world in some way.
But I also have taken part in boycotts and much bigger "protests" over matters of principle.
I'm definitely gay. I would like to get married someday. I just can't, in good conscience, put my own money into Orson Scott Card's pocket and feel good about myself.
I hope that doesn't sound too whiny.
Yours,
Sylvan (Dave)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 06:28 pm (UTC)I remember back when he used to lead the Secular Humanist Revivals, and then for the last however-many years he's been spewing this crap. I'm sorry for the loss for the rest of you, but I just shrug and move on and try to ignore him as much as possible. Sometimes it isn't. If he and I ever meet, I suspect we will have words.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 06:16 pm (UTC)It most certainly can affect me.
When I am (or want to be) involved in said affairs.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 06:22 pm (UTC)I really like Charley Reese's viewpoint on it.
Date: 2008-07-31 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 07:07 pm (UTC)But but but... that's in direct contradiction to this! :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 07:13 pm (UTC)...and the WI governor has decreed that the law WILL be strongly enforced for gay couples -.- DIE IN A FIRE, WISCONSIN GOVERNMENT!!!!!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-01 12:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 07:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 07:24 pm (UTC)I'm wondering if, seeing as how NY State will recognize the marriages performed in other states, there will be special marriage buses from NYC to Boston to make things a bit easier and a bit cheaper for those who can't afford honeymoons up there.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 07:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 08:01 pm (UTC)Or is that women? I keep forgetting. Anyway, GET YOUR GAYS OFF MY PEE-PEE!
Also, NO MORE FETUS KILLING! Life in all forms is ABSOLUTELY SACRED! (swats fly) damn pests...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 08:35 pm (UTC)I'll admit that watching two guys kiss doesn't do a thing for me. Which is why when that sort of thing happens in my field of vision I ... wait for it ... look somewhere else.
Oh, and belated congratulations on regaining some mobility.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 10:46 pm (UTC)She was a Massachusetts Portuguese Catholic, and he was a Michigan Finnish (unchurched) Lutheran. They got married in her church. In the Eisenhower era, that was called a mixed-race marriage, folks.
I believe there are some states where that was illegal back then, although I don't know about Michigan. But there was enough there for someone to stir up a bees' nest of trouble, if they'd tried.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-01 12:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-07-31 11:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-01 02:09 am (UTC)There's also my very deeply held religious beliefs on the matter and it makes for some confusion sometimes. I guess the best thing I can do is to love people and be kind to them, kinda like what Jesus taught people in the first place.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-01 02:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-01 03:39 am (UTC)Yeah, Orson: That was filthier and eviller than your pet Chimp torturing and blowing up Iraqi in a made-up war to pad Cheney's pockets.
Why is it that everytime someone "Finds Jeezis," that person immediately LOSES all shreds of compassion, tolerance, sense of humor, intelligence and respect for other people?
I suppose Orson's gotta keep his Xenu -- 'scuse me, Mormon -- overlords pleased or they might, I dunno, disapprove or something earth-shattering like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-01 04:17 am (UTC)Then again, I have decent spelling, so maybe that's it.
I believe in the sanctity of marriage and that's why I want it legal for the gays.
/token Christian commentary
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-01 04:24 am (UTC)Cory has a theory that people are much more averse to men being gay then women, on the theory that butt sexxors is Icky.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-01 06:52 am (UTC)