Biden: His Time?
Aug. 23rd, 2008 09:03 pmI have to go over all of the various and sundry recollections of Joe Biden's record and life story to solidify things in my head. But I do have one huge problem with the guy.
In my experience, he don't walk the walk.
I seem to recall a whole bunch of times when he got huffy, he got loud, he got in people's faces on national TV, he said the right things with an appropriate level of outrage and some sterling eloquence... and then voted for whatever BushCo wanted anyway.
My problem with Obama on this is perhaps subtler: He picked Biden to spackle over Obama's inexperience in foreign policy, at least as perceived in comparison to McCain.
We don't need "experience". We need some FUCKING LEADERSHIP. Some brains and thought and compassion and common sense.
This is one of several moves -- not a huge number, but noticeable and each fairly major -- that I feel Obama has made to hedge his bets. I'm sure he and his advisers would say they are "compromising".
Things as they are now are awful. They have become awful because of all these motherfuckers with "experience". We need new blood, new ideas, new ways of thinking and living and prioritizing and doing.
And Joe Biden ain't on that particular team.
Thoughts?
In my experience, he don't walk the walk.
I seem to recall a whole bunch of times when he got huffy, he got loud, he got in people's faces on national TV, he said the right things with an appropriate level of outrage and some sterling eloquence... and then voted for whatever BushCo wanted anyway.
My problem with Obama on this is perhaps subtler: He picked Biden to spackle over Obama's inexperience in foreign policy, at least as perceived in comparison to McCain.
We don't need "experience". We need some FUCKING LEADERSHIP. Some brains and thought and compassion and common sense.
This is one of several moves -- not a huge number, but noticeable and each fairly major -- that I feel Obama has made to hedge his bets. I'm sure he and his advisers would say they are "compromising".
Things as they are now are awful. They have become awful because of all these motherfuckers with "experience". We need new blood, new ideas, new ways of thinking and living and prioritizing and doing.
And Joe Biden ain't on that particular team.
Thoughts?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 01:17 am (UTC)I give him a half pass on the bankruptcy bill, given where he's from and who his biggest constituency is. I hope that not being directly dependent on them (representing 50 states instead of only Delaware) will help him do the right thing.
He's repudiated his vote for the war -- which is more than Hillary did forever, and more than McLame will ever do -- and also publicly acknowledged his error in SCOTUS confirmation.
He's better than the other reported short-listers (Kaine and Bayh), not as good as Sebelius or Clark, and he's what we've got. Maybe he'll come up with as good a line about McSame as he did about 9iu11iani. (Although his original line is now circulating as "A noun, a verb, POW!")
In short, meh -- but far better than the opposition.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 01:20 am (UTC)Damn
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 01:25 am (UTC)not to be Chicken Little, but still...:-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 09:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 01:36 am (UTC)Experience vs Leadership
Date: 2008-08-24 01:48 am (UTC)We *need* politicians. I think that Obama has the makings of a good one. A pure idealogue may make me feel good, but will alienate half the country. Yes, Obama needs to compromise. I won't always like his compromises, but the alternatives are nastier in the long run.
The only way to fix everything quickly would be a revolution, and I don't mean the bloodless kind. I don't like the state of our country, but I'd rather see gradual change than half of my neighbors dead.
Re: Experience vs Leadership
Date: 2008-08-24 05:48 am (UTC)Re: Experience vs Leadership
From:Re: Experience vs Leadership
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 02:12 am (UTC)That being said, I'd have a very hard time supporting anyone who's been in the Senate far all or part of the last eight sorry years. After all, these people took a solemn oath, in front of God and everybody, to uphold the Constitution. They then watched it being shredded, blatantly, for years, with never a serious attempt to impeach. I'm sure there are Americans who have the stones to at least try to do their jobs, without worrying too much about whether they'd be successful in the endeavor or what it would do to their career prospects, but I wouldn't look for them in the recent crop of Senators.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 02:34 am (UTC)The ones I'd rather have? Chris Dodd, who fought the FISA revisions (especially retroactive immunity) tooth and nail. Russ Feingold, whose beliefs and votes are clearly liberal and aimed at improving the lives of citizens.
Okay, two. Not enough, but a start.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 02:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 05:51 am (UTC)not my idea to speak of such hideous things, jsut a topic that is in the paper.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 02:27 am (UTC)-L.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-26 05:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 02:31 am (UTC)the LAST thing i wanted to see in a VP was someone who says one thing and does another. If you want someone who can "compromise" and play with the big league boys, there are several people who fence sat or changed sides with more grace.
of course, there are an awful lot of folks who just swung over to Obama because of Bush's "medical conscience" bill.....
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 02:38 am (UTC)Joe is just one more symptom that somebody's put the strings on Obama. I'd like to find that somebody in a dark alley. (Of course, figuring out who it is is somewhat problematic....)
Not that I'd even *think* of voting for Bush III, but I too am getting steadily less sanguine about the whole frakking affair...
Thoughts
Date: 2008-08-24 02:48 am (UTC)No, I think the problem is priorities. The people in power have mostly the wrong ones. They're after more power, money, fame, that sort of thing. They don't give a flying fuck about the Earth, posterity, or humanity other than what they can get out of those for their own gratification.
I'm firmly convinced that letting John McCain into the White House would be a flaming disaster. I think he's entirely too likely to start WWIII.
Obama ... has potential. He seems responsive to input. That's more promising than anything I've seen approach the White House in many a long year. I don't think he'd get us all killed in a stupid war or deliberately set the Earth more on fire than it already is. And that's about what my standards have come down to.
I was for Kucinich. He didn't last long. He had the answers to just about every problem we're facing, and they weren't pleasant answers, and people SO did not want to hear that. Leadership? Sadly, not so much. I saw him deliver the Articles of Impeachment; he's such a poor public speaker that I'm amazed he got elected for anything. He's impeccable with facts, but people generally don't care much for facts these days.
I'll settle for a charmer who is unlikely to do serious damage and might actually do some good. Better him than the plausible alternative of McCain.
But if you're determined to vote your hopes, check out the Green Party; they're fielding a fine team who haven't got a snowflake's chance, but have the right ideas. Or hell, write in somebody you think could actually do a decent job.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 02:55 am (UTC)Picking a running mate who's on the record pointing out your flaws is just not a good idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 04:09 pm (UTC)That said, if Biden is as much a coin-operated automaton for special interests as early reports suggest, I'm a lot more likely to cast a protest vote for Barr. (Meh. If Virginia is actually in play, it's over anyway, so it's not like it matters what I do.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 02:55 am (UTC)I researched Biden today. The Washington Post vote database puts him as voting Democratic platform 96.6% of the time. (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/b000444/) (I am a classic Democrat.) Key votes (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/b000444/key-votes/) of the last few years include:
- No on expanding surveillance without a court order
- Yes to expand children's health insurance
- Yes to inspect cargo coming into the country
- Yes to ban the use of torture (or whatever they're calling it these days.)
Unfortunately, he has also consistently voted yes for blanket war funding, although he did oppose the surge. (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Joe_Biden)
According to Project Vote Smart's Interest Group Ratings, (http://www.votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=S0150103) Biden has consistently high marks from humane societies, farmer's unions, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, ACLU and other civil liberties groups, human rights, National Education Association, environmental conservation groups, Children's Defense Fund, Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (Gun Owners of American schizophrenically ping-pong between low and high ratings for him), public health and disabilities groups, labor unions, liberal groups, military groups (especially disabled veterans - do look at McCain's voting record there), and senior and social security issues.
Most importantly to me, Biden has a rating of between 75 to 100% from NARAL and Planned Parenthood, which makes sense for someone who wrote the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) (http://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/regulations.htm). This makes him the perfect person to contact regarding Bush's latest loogie smearing down the Constitution, the upcoming Health and Human Services Regulation to Protect Health Care Providers From Discrimination (http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2008pres/08/20080821a.html) - which, if you read it (http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2008pres/08/20080821reg.pdf), translates to "Regulation to protect bigots from refusing to provide or refer patients to abortion or birth control services without any penalty for this refusal."
Joe Biden isn't on the team that would permit crap like this from sliding into law when people aren't looking. That's enough for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 05:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 03:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-25 01:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 03:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 04:05 am (UTC)As pointed out above, Biden votes 97% along the lines of democratic lines. And what exactly does the Vice President do? He breaks ties in the Senate. That's it. It gives the democrats someone strong they know won't F-up something their party is after if it gets to the dreaded tie.
And from a completely painted picture perspective, it does give Obama someone with McCain old experience. A VP is someone you say is giving you strength and when you point out their weakness, you can say, "Well, he's the VP, not the Big P."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 04:07 am (UTC)Biden is live ammo in the hands of the Swift-boaters.
When WILL the dems give up that circular firing squad and their tendency to yank defeat from the jaws of victory?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 04:15 am (UTC)I've heard that people were spectulating he would choose Hillary as his running mate. While I'm sure that would have been excellent for the Democratic Party and would have diversified Obama's camp with something "new", I can't think of anything that would have been more contrived. So I am glad that he chose someone else, even if that someone would appear to be the "obvious" choice.
This makes me feel a smidge better about voting for him. For me it's either Obama or the Green party, because I certainly don't want McCain to win.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 04:24 am (UTC)I mostly remember him for the Judge Bork confirmation hearings, where he did more than any other Senator to keep that walking Chernobyl off the court. Imagine if Bork, and not Kennedy, had been there for the last 20 years.
That's gotta make up for a very large amount of same old same old.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 05:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 05:46 am (UTC)unfortunately for hill, bill made it impossible for her to be veep. he wont' reveal his financial transactions post-presidency. and there's not room for bill and a new prez in the white house.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 05:50 am (UTC)I am curious as to what the Hispanic community, especially those who supported Clinton, have to say about Joe Biden, what his record is on immigration votes and other issues of concern, and whether the fact he is Catholic would actually make any difference in how any of them would vote. I'm sure this is something that Obama and his advisors considered as part of the selection process.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 06:19 am (UTC)Oh, yes! And good discussion over at Making Light (http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/010516.html).
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 06:20 am (UTC)Do they even DO anything? Would he be an advisor to the president? Can he effect anything at all?
Forgive me if I am completely ignorant here...I just can't remember when a vice-president ever did anything at all.....(except take the president's place at certain state functions.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 06:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-24 01:47 pm (UTC)What I do think Biden brings to the table is the ability to work the system to get the things Obama will want done. Like him or hate him (mostly the latter) Cheney has done an excellent job for Bush in that regard.
The VP may not be a visible part of the administration, but he can be a key one.