The Female Belly
Dec. 1st, 2008 09:11 am... has been forced to search for a new record label after Roadrunner refused to promote her latest single, video and album. Why? Because she refused to let them remove shots of her “fat” belly from the video for Leeds United, and is therefore “uncommercial”. This comes from a metal label where, I have it on good authority, “you can count the number of women on the fingers of one hand and most of the people on the label are decidedly chunky hairy dudes”. Amanda’s fans are quiet rightly outraged by this shoddy, sexist behaviour and have begun a Rebellyon, posting pictures of their own bellies on fan forum Shadowbox and sending them to Roadrunner in protest:Okay, first: I watched that video carefully, and I think Amanda's got a lovely tummy. A tummy that just invites you to run your hand over it affectionately. Assuming she lets you. I'm hard-pressed to think of a woman I've ever been involved with that doesn't have that kind of tummy.This issue is not just about Amanda Palmer’s belly. This issue is about all the bellies of the world: big, small, hairy, stretch-marked, scarred, pregnant; every single belly. The aim is to reclaim the belly, to promote a healthy body image for everyone (not just females) and to protest against the “barbie dolling” of artists by record companies and the media.
Second, what is it with these thin-freak nutbars, those in the media who have taken it upon themselves to determine the appropriate size for a human being and make us all follow along? They thought Kate Winslet was fat. They apparently think America Ferrara is fat. I guess they think the women in Frazetta paintings and the elf princess in Everquest are fat.
If you like sulky anorexics with the physiques of nineteen-year-old boys... maybe you should just date nineteen-year-old boys, y'know?
Yeesh.
ETA: to clarify that I'm not ripping on skinny women, but on those who have decreed that skinny women are what we should want/want to be.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 02:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 02:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 02:48 pm (UTC)I am also reminded of a woman I knew a few years ago. She worked at the place that had the best open mike I have ever been to. Most of the women who went in there were the skinny type. She was all curves and hips and belly and breasts. She would walk through the room and every eye was on her. The media would say she was fat. To make matters worse, she was smart and funny too.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:06 pm (UTC)Numbskulls.
These people are why we are still talking about sexism and the need for actual equality. *sigh* I might be more coherent later.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:27 pm (UTC)(Thanks for the nudge; I have meant for a while to check out the video for one of my favorite songs, the DDs' Sing. And, as it happens, the search also yielded a vid of them doing Science Fiction Double Feature)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 03:34 am (UTC)Sorry.
Every once in awhile, someone on this board says, "Embrace the power of 'and'". Steams the heck out of me. It seems very condescending. It's an attempt to make me, and whoever, think about what their saying, about acceptance tolerance blah blah blah.
I work very hard to be as accepting and tolerant as possible. But I have watched pretty much every woman in my entire life trying to somehow make themselves thinner, because then they'll be happy. Or they'll be attractive. Or they'll be something. I really don't know what.
I have a huge problem with my mom going off for five minutes on how her newest diet doesn't work, how she can't exercise enough, how little she eats sometimes, how she hates the way she feels, and then, "Tommy, you've got to lose weight!" Gee, Mom, thanks, I never thought of that. I'll get right on it.
And the "sulky anorexics etc." are not the other end of the female spectrum. They are too frickin' skinny, unhealthily so. And we as a nation have been conditioned to want them, to want to look like them, to spend billions of dollars to try to become them, to starve and torment ourselves to become them. I'm not swiping at them, Marty; I'm swiping at the swine who tell us being that skinny is the only way to go.
I mean, have you ever seen Gigi Edgley? I don't know where the hell she puts her internal organs.
You are a lovely woman, Marty. Ample? Try extremely huggable. The thinnest women I know still have a little extra on them, in very nice places I might add. At least one of them frightened the hell out me, years ago, by saying she was trying to lose weight. If she'd lost six ounces, you could've seen through her.
If it is cheapening my argument to call out the unnatural body type that these insane people want us to go for, then I guess I've got a cheap argument. But I find a wide range of women very attractive, and they're not the ones in Maxim.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:41 pm (UTC)Ew. Just, ew.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:45 pm (UTC)Planing down the thighs
Planing down the thighs
I make 5 bucks an hour
Planing down the thighs
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 03:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 05:39 pm (UTC)Oh, indeed. A couple of years ago, somebody interviewed one of the "supermodels" and reported that she looked at a picture of Marilyn Monroe in the famous flesh-colored dress and said, "If I were that fat I'd kill myself."
(I am trying hard to remind myself that the model in question is probably ill-tempered and not quite sane due to semi-starvation. I am trying to feel compassion for someone whose livelihood depends on conforming to that mold. But gee, it's hard not to say "good riddance.")
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 04:03 pm (UTC)Dear media - I know I'm fat. Seriously, I'm completely aware of it. Treating women who have slender healthy bodies as if _they're_ fat just because their bellies don't happen to form a cavern on film? That's not going to make me any less fat, and certainly isn't going to make me feel any better about my size. So please don't make any assinine arguments about doing this so as not to present fat as being healthy. She isn't. I am. I know it's not.
Also, if it's all about selling stuff - you'll sell more food if you make big beautiful again. :P And frankly, her fan base would prefer to see more of her body, not less. Just sayin'.
*grumblegrowl*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 05:18 pm (UTC)I'm not saying it's a conspiracy--there isn't some sinister organisation behind it. It's just the way corporate demons do their business, and they all do the same because it works.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 04:37 pm (UTC)I am an important woman. I am queenly. I am imperial. I encompass multitudes. You could discover worlds in me.
How DARE you suggest I should be made SMALL?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 04:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 04:44 pm (UTC)Having never heard of her before I followed the link. She's not even chubby. Granted, my tastes may differ from the perceived mainstream. There's a lady in my building who my coworker thinks "She's attractive, but too chunky." She makes my knees wobble when she walks by.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 04:47 pm (UTC)I mean, I agree it's superficial and stupid, but I could get them being antsy if she was cupcaking out of her trousers while bending (even chicks with no body fat do that in some of the low-rise pants nowadays) or if she was jiggling in the wrong areas while dancing at the end, or if there were long camera shots with clearly visible belly.
But there isn't. You can barely even see it under the baggy dress suit and jacket, and I'll admit there is one point (at four minutes and eleven seconds, for approximately half a second, if you have binoculars and squint, on this video) at which you can tell, because she bends and the shirt isn't in the way, that there might be an ounce of her that isn't bone and muscle. But how many people (before this debacle) were going to look at that bending and notice the slight curve that briefly appears and go, "Hmm, unattractive, I don't like this now." Seriously, how many? Fifteen, out of a million?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 11:10 pm (UTC)What do you do with body fat? Burn it? What else do you burn? Wood! So what is body fat made of? Wood. What else does wood do? It floats! and what else floats? Very small rocks?
A duck!
And so if she weighs less than a duck she must be fat!
That masters degree in physics has made me wise in the ways of science!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 04:54 pm (UTC)-=ShoEboX=-
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 05:03 pm (UTC)I have to wonder if
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 05:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 08:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 05:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 05:20 pm (UTC)Dear Tom, even if all your other amazing talents dry up into dust, for this line, and this line alone I will always consider you wonderful.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 05:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 07:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-01 06:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-02 12:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: