"We Are Not Quitters"
Feb. 25th, 2009 07:38 amDamn.
Damn.
It's gonna be long and ugly and painful... but I really am hopeful we're gonna get through this, together, and be a stronger nation because of it.
(You might like reading this piece about Ty'Sheoma Bethea, the teenager who Obama invited to the speech.
(On the other hand, you may not be able to stomach Gov. Bobby Jindal's response [transcript here]. Jayzus god, he sounds like he's auditioning for a Mr. Rogers-style kids' show. Even the Villagers hated it.)
Thoughts?
Damn.
It's gonna be long and ugly and painful... but I really am hopeful we're gonna get through this, together, and be a stronger nation because of it.
(You might like reading this piece about Ty'Sheoma Bethea, the teenager who Obama invited to the speech.
(On the other hand, you may not be able to stomach Gov. Bobby Jindal's response [transcript here]. Jayzus god, he sounds like he's auditioning for a Mr. Rogers-style kids' show. Even the Villagers hated it.)
Thoughts?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 01:09 pm (UTC)One minor nit - America didn't invent the automobile. Germany did. That was a failed fact check on his speechwriter's part.
As for the response by Bobby Jindal...I think I cringed every time he said "Americans can do anything!" when he didn't really mean it. I'm sorry but his tone came across as completely false.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 01:17 pm (UTC)ETA: Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile) says the first modern auto was designed by Karl Benz in 1878, and he got a patent in 1879. American George Selden had something in 1877, but he never built a working model, finally getting a patent for a two-stroke engine in 1895.
The first assembly line was created by Random Olds in 1902, and greatly expanded by Henry Ford in 1914.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 01:16 pm (UTC)He's right, of course. It is going to be a lot of work, repairing the damage to this country. It's almost scary, the idea that his administration has so far found US$2 trillion (with a T!) in savings over the next decade that can be saved from the Federal budget. I wonder how much of that is pork fat and how much is going to really pinch to lose.
Still, it was a good speech. I'm hopeful that he can accomplish what he's set out to do.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 01:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 06:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 08:34 pm (UTC)And before that, when they had to press one for English.
And before that, when they dropped Faith Based Sciencey Educationish Product from Junior's school curriculum.
They won't stop combusting, and people are used to it now. Just give 'em a padded room to throw fits in until they've chewed their own tongues off and can't make mouth noises any more.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 01:31 pm (UTC)I also got a warm fuzzy feeling from another of Obama's guests, the banker who distributed his bonuses amongst his workers (http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/24/obama.guests/index.html?iref=mpstoryview). If we had more guys like that kicking around, the financial world wouldn't be in such a shambles.
Jindal's your basic political opportunist. The big machine takes them, polishes them up, parades them around, then gobbles 'em up and spits them out. Bleh.
Oh, and as someone in another blog somewhere said, wasn't it awesome to see Biden sitting there in Cheney's old seat? :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 01:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 01:41 pm (UTC)Jindahl's speech seemed to have been written before anyone in his team saw Obama's speech because the points he was arguing weren't the major points of the plan. It was weird. It was a disconnect the likes of which I haven't seen since...wow, since Cheney kept insisting the WMD were in Iraq (just a year or year and a half ago...)
Jindahl seems a good guy. It's too bad he made such a blunder so early in his national career.
BTW, I heard a part of an interview with McCain. Did I hear right, that he's agreeing with Obama?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 01:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 06:03 pm (UTC)Obama should use a jetpack!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 08:35 pm (UTC)And he will, too!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 04:23 pm (UTC)His rhetoric was to construct straw men and attack arguments that Obama never made.
He spent his first three minutes intoducing himself to the American public, giving them his story...you know, sort of like a candidate aspiring for higher office....
("Sort of like" is meant to be ironic.)
I'll be interested to find out if Chuck Schumer is correct in his interpretation of the stimulus legislation that Louisiana must choose either to accept or reject the entire package rather than pick and choose - in Jindal's case, accept over 98% of the money but reject the extended unemployment benefits so as not to make Louisiana business eventually actually pay for extended unemployment benefits. I hear echoes of "Thanks, but no thanks" for the Bridge To Nowhere idea (and no thanks for it but we'll take the money).
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:03 pm (UTC)http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/547231.aspx
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:11 pm (UTC)Bobby Jindahl is a complete douchebag. Unless I missed something, he just blamed the failed response to Katrina on too much government intervention. And then complained about "unnecessary spending" on 1) greening the government's car fleet, 2) improving public transportation, and 3) protecting other people from natural disasters. It makes Sarah Palin's complaint about funding genetic research on endangered species sound downright sensible. And also,
Jayzus god, he sounds like he's auditioning for a Mr. Rogers-style kids' show.
And he wouldn't have been called back for a second reading, either.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:59 pm (UTC)Heartily laughing agreement!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:12 pm (UTC)*Happy* to be there to take it on.
God, I don't think I've *ever* seen that one.
And besides, the man's just such an impressive speaker.
OTOH, last week I saw an interview special (I thinkon HBO?) where the person was going round gas stations in the South and inteviewing random folks, and getting bizarre hivemind propaganda responses that make him out to be 666 and so on, right out of evol talk radio. One of them told the interviewer in a perfectly kind polite way that he didn't even want *her* to have a vote, because she's a woman. *boggle*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 04:27 pm (UTC)In the interest of full disclosure, even though a recurve bow is my favorite implement for target shooting, and I have no desire to hunt in any fashion, I also like to target shoot with guns occasionally.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 07:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 05:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 07:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 07:47 pm (UTC)Which leads back to the idea of making it too expensive.
Anyway, you get the idea. I don't want to derail Tom's discussion of the speech too much with my pet peeves.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 08:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:29 pm (UTC)Heh. What was that Lincoln said about slavery? That its most ardent proponents never seemed eager to have it tried on themselves? (In other words, him first.)
I'm just depressed because I was listening to the radio this morning trying to catch the weather forecast (the oldies station I loved as a child is now an all-talk "we're not right wing, honest" borefest), and was dismayed to realise that the announcer was waxing rapturous over the market rebound caused ostensibly by the "positive news from south of the border that nationalisation is off the table." Would it be too much to ask the US to stop exporting GOP talking points?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 02:22 am (UTC)I did notice that the Fox announcers were practically rhapsodizing over O's speech, which is quite a sea change from earlier 'tudes they were propagating on that network.
I never thought I'd see that, either!
So that may be where some of the other media outlets start trending, in order to follow the political power, not just the ownership money.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:27 pm (UTC)Jindal is clueless to the extreme.
Edited: Only to add the fact that I, too, am extremely hopeful that things will get better, and thrilled that we seem to be addressing the issues. Pain, yes it will happen (and already has been on a personal level), but we cannot fix it without going through it.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:39 pm (UTC)I was also delighted, as I have been all along, at how well the speech was built, and how well delivered. No misunderestimating here! My wife is impressed by the way that, even when he's speaking extemporaneously, if he says that he has three points, he gets to three points.
Once again, now let's see if we can deliver on some of these goals. I did notice how the Republicans were sitting with their arms crossed and their lower lips out at the beginning of the affair.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 03:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 04:15 pm (UTC)There is a lesson in this experience [Katrina]: The strength of America is not found in our government
Not after 8 years of Republican rule, no!
But Democratic leaders in Congress -- they rejected this approach. Instead of trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money,...
Translation: "Instead of trusting Republicans to make wise decisions with taxpayer money..." I wonder if that has something to do with the wisdom of Republican decisions about what to do with taxpayer money in the previous 8 years?
g. It includes $300 million to buy new cars for the government, $8 billion for high-speed rail projects, such as a "magnetic levitation" line from Las Vegas to Disneyland, and $140 million for something called "volcano monitoring."
Right, because fuel efficient cars don't do anything for the environment and building them doesn't create new jobs; better transportation infrastructure doesn't do anything for the environment and building *it* doesn't create new jobs or contribute to productivity in the future after the recession is over, and heaven forfend the government might actually be able to warn people about volcanoes that are about to explode--that would puncture the Republican propaganda that government can't do anything right.
Who among us would ask our children for a loan, so we could spend money we do not have, on things we do not need?
Right, who spent money we did not have on expensive tax cuts that heavily favored the richest 2%? Who spent money we did not have on a war with a country that hadn't attacked us and wasn't going to, over weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist and ties to Al Quaeda that didn't exist either? Who spent money we did not have on a second war that wouldn't have been necessary in the first place if the Republican administration had kept their minds on their *jobs* when they were warned about terrorists instead of saying "yeah, whatever; what can you tell me about Iraq."? Am I supposed to believe we *needed* those things?
Oh, good grief; if *this* is the best the Republicans have to offer, they'd better keep looking.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 10:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 05:03 pm (UTC)It's not asking your children for a loan, it's asking your employers for an advance!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 05:27 pm (UTC)Did he SERIOUSLY think it was funny to joke about his mother's pregnancy being a "pre existing condition" and somehow noble that his father had to put the family in debt to pay for Bobby's birth and then to joke about how he was "glad he never missed a payment"?
I guess the Dickensian idea of poorhouses full of repossessed kids sounds like a good or at least amusing concept?
Gah. Seriously.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 06:47 pm (UTC)I also think the Republicans had better get on board with Obama because if they continue to stonewall while things get worse, they will further erode the support they are losing.
It's one thing to disagree or work for the things you want but in the end you have to go for what is best fro the country - a weird concept I know.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 08:59 pm (UTC)After 8 years of shit, dirty tricks, thievery, hate, fear and lies, I hope that as Obama's administration grows and helps to bring this nation and its people back to productivity and some measure of prosperity for all, I hope the GOP implodes, eats itself alive, and forever falls apart as an example of political natural selection. It is a dinosaur, and dinosaurs are extinct. What works best and for all survives best, and the ways of Nixon, Dubya, Cheney and their ilk rae, in the long run, doomed to fail. It may take a while for this to happen, for the understanding of this truth to sink in, but it is truth nonetheless.
In the film Ghandi, it is alleged that the Mahatma once said, When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall -- think of it, ALWAYS."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 02:27 am (UTC)I don't like one-sided systems!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-25 11:09 pm (UTC)Of course it's gonna be a long and rather unpleasant slog before things get better.
My only other thought is that Jindal is looking to be Palin's running mate in 2012.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 02:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 03:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:48 pm (UTC)I feel like I'm listening to an infomercial, or an instructional film in high school.
"Who amongst us would ask our children for a loan?" Um. Pot, kettle.
"Americans can do anything." (Repeat ad nauseam.)
"We, the Republicans, promise to live up to our promises." Yeah. Chatter's cheap, smiley. Let's see what you do.