Navigation
Page Summary
drzarron.livejournal.com - (no subject)
klangley56.livejournal.com - (no subject)
markbernstein.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wingus.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gridlore.livejournal.com - (no subject)
robin-june.livejournal.com - (no subject)
alverant.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ericcoleman - (no subject)
wrenn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
banjoplayinnerd.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jrtom.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Fluid Measure by
- Theme: Warm Embrace by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 08:48 pm (UTC)Not as good as the first, but wildly enjoyable. Several true Nergasm moments. Stay all the way through to the end of the credits.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 08:54 pm (UTC)And, yes, another surprise at the very end of the credits.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 09:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 09:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 09:28 pm (UTC)I really didn't believe in Justin Hammer as a brilliant industrialist. Had we seen more of an "anything to win" side of him earlier in the film, and known that his "I'm such a goofy guy" act was just a public veneer, his actions later in the film would have made more sense. A little rewriting of the Senate hearing and the scenes in Monaco would have done the trick.
Rourke was amazing as usual. Having Ivan own a pet bird was his idea. He saw there was little to the character beyond the vengeance plot, so he suggested the bird as a humanizing aspect.
The Easter Egg was extremely cool. Can't wait for that movie!
*spoiler alert*
Date: 2010-05-09 11:16 pm (UTC)"You'd be Thor, too, if you fell from the sky and made a crater that big!"
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 06:38 am (UTC)I liked it better than the first movie--the twists in the final fight scene were set up very nicely, and without the timing gaffes in the original movie's fight scene. But both movies were quite good.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 09:58 pm (UTC)Spank Their ButtsDope-Slap them Upside the Head like Naughty Toddlers caught playing with matches -- oooh, I soooooo wanted to stop him from doing that!(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 03:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 04:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 10:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-27 01:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-09 11:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 05:39 am (UTC)And no, I haven't read any of the posts. I won't see it 'till later in the week as well.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-12 11:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 06:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 04:37 pm (UTC)I really didn't believe in Hammer as being even moderately intelligent, period. To me, he had a vibe of "I inherited this business from my father and I haven't managed to screw it up yet" (basically, Tony Stark without the charisma and brilliance in R&D). I didn't read the comics so I have no idea of his actual backstory, but that's how he came off.
How did Vanko manage to create another suit without anyone noticing? You can't tell me that Hammer (dumb as he appeared) didn't have him under 24/7 surveillance.
I thought that the bit with the bird had the potential to go somewhere and then it kind of fizzled. (Why did Vanko just let it go when Hammer tried to pawn another bird off on him?)
Do not engage in close combat with the guy whose best weapons only work at close range. Sheesh, guys.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-05 12:53 am (UTC)I don't think we were supposed to view Hammer as a "brilliant industrialist"; but rather as a guy who was good at claiming credit for other people's work (which is what he does with both War Machine and Vanko, IMHO). As a side note, this Hammer isn't very close to his comic book counterpart (again, IMHO).