Google Fu -- er, Flu
Feb. 26th, 2009 12:10 pmThis is so clever, I can't believe it. As David Pogue in the NY Times puts it:
Have you been sick this year? I tend to avoid the flu, but I've had stomach problems, a few allergies I didn't have a few years ago, and a little too much stress-related ick.
One of Google’s geniuses figured out that whenever people get sick, they use Google to search for more information. By collating these searches, Google has created an early-warning system for flu outbreaks in your area, with color-coded graphs. Google says that Flu Trends has recognized outbreaks two weeks sooner than the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has.Obviously, not perfect, but... damn, that's clever. Thanks to tristero at Hullabaloo for the heads-up.
Have you been sick this year? I tend to avoid the flu, but I've had stomach problems, a few allergies I didn't have a few years ago, and a little too much stress-related ick.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:26 pm (UTC)Hey, Tom?
Date: 2009-02-26 05:36 pm (UTC)Sigh. I seem to be anomalous. When I came down with a flu-like illness a few days ago, I stayed off-line for 48-hours. I considered all the symptoms I had, correlated them against everything I knew about the flu, came up short by one symptom (chills, no fever), and thought, "Wotthehell, Kiwi, you're sick anyway, girl. Just go back to sleep." I didn't need to validate it by Googling."
Re: Hey, Tom?
Date: 2009-02-26 05:38 pm (UTC)Re: Hey, Tom?
Date: 2009-02-26 05:42 pm (UTC)Here's the anomaly. Most people don't know enough details about the flu to be able to reliably do this.
Oh, probably.
Date: 2009-02-26 05:51 pm (UTC)It's the same list every year, too. Flu symptoms (http://familydoctor.org/online/famdocen/home/common/infections/cold-flu/073.html) don't change all that much, though the strains do.
Re: Oh, probably.
Date: 2009-02-26 06:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:14 pm (UTC)And the next day they'll just come for you and stuff you in a padded room, no explanation given. And then the robots take over, Copper Top...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:27 pm (UTC)("If I had a million zombies")
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 07:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 07:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 07:26 pm (UTC)There is a world of difference between using _aggregated_ information about a very specific kind of search--in this case, for flu symptoms--to provide a public service, and _selling_ (or even giving away) information about _individuals_.
I'd also point out that building models of "what people are doing online" is what makes Google (and other search engines) work. Specifically, the original PageRank algorithm looked at how people were connecting their websites together (which is clearly a part of what people are doing online) and used this to improve the quality of search results by a huge margin over previous techniques.
Because of what I work on, I have access to Google's search logs that most Google employees don't have. When we apply for access, we are required to sign a document that explains exactly how we can and cannot use this information, and discusses the underlying principles involved. We know that this is an issue, and we take this responsibility seriously. And I promise you that if anyone at Google suggests that we use our data in a way that's not appropriate, they get slapped down hard.
I encourage you to hold Google and its employees responsible for things that it actually _does_, and I also encourage you to work for the passage of laws that give individuals more control over how their data may be used. But--again, speaking only for myself--I'd also ask you to consider why you expect Google in particular to misuse this kind of data. And frankly, I'm a bit insulted by your final suggestion.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 08:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 08:54 pm (UTC)I can certainly understand why you're leery of letting any single entity (corporate or otherwise) have access to everything that you see and do on the computer. What I objected to is you laying this all on Google, specifically. There are, as you pointed out, lots of other companies out there that have already earned your distrust; we try hard not to. :)
On a related note: Google does a pretty good job, I think, of trying to make it easy for you to take your business elsewhere. Changing search engines is trivial; taking your email elsewhere is less so but definitely doable (I believe GMail provides tools to export your email). I think that part of the reason why we do this is to help keep ourselves honest: it means that we always have to think about what our users will want (and _not_ want).
Finally, it takes more than one board member change. It takes a number of employees deciding that they're willing to implement those changes...and it requires that none of those involved decide to quit and make a big media thing out of it. (Google employees have a high enough reputation for excellence that finding another job would probably in most cases not be a big deal, I'd guess.)
I do hope we see some federal laws that give individuals more control over how their collected data may be used, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:56 pm (UTC)As for illness, stress-related ick (as you put it nicely) has been extremely high for the past year or so.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:13 pm (UTC)I don't usually get sick. About this time last year I was in the throes of consecutive exceptions. A respiratory infection followed shortly by ... I'll just say gastric issues and leave it at that. So far this winter nothing worse than a minor case of the sniffles.
As I've been exercising a bit more (walking the dog a couple of miles counts, right?) I've felt rather better. That and taking the stairs more at work.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:16 pm (UTC)Got knocked out by -something- for a couple of days last week; beyond that I've been good.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 07:21 pm (UTC)The numbers seem to be down quite a bit from previous years... I wonder if that is due to the increased numbers of unemployed. People who aren't out working aren't exposed to all the crap that goes around in offices. I know that's probably the sole reason why I haven't gotten sick yet this year. We'll see if that changes once I am finally back to work again next week.
It also probably helps that I've been much more of a hand sanitizer/hand washing nazi than I've been in the past. Having worked at a hospital probably has something to do with that. I consistently use hand sanitizer after using a pen to sign a receipt at a store or restaurant, and after touching doorknobs, handrails, ATMs, other peoples' hands, etc.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 09:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 09:22 pm (UTC)Kids truly are little germ factories, study proves (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26611205/)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-27 12:36 am (UTC)Had a minor migraine (complete with aura!) yesterday for the first time in about 18 months.
Other than that, I'm not doing too bad so far.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-27 01:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-27 03:08 am (UTC)