Us vs. ... Us
Apr. 8th, 2009 10:48 amSounds like a one-off PartiallyClips strip, but it's real:
Oh, and, I take it that the companies don't actually get enough remuneration from Fox to keep the employee on. So it's basically a national ad showing that you and your company suck.
The complete and total distillation of the modern "conservative" credo: Screw You, I Got Mine.
Coming to Fox: a reality series in which actual companies that are struggling to stay afloat in this lousy economy agree -- presumably in exchange for money -- to let their staffs decide which among them is going to get pink-slipped to save money.Because, after all, we're all in this together, right?
To populate its new "Lord of the Flies"-esque series, "Someone's Gotta Go," Fox has lined up actual companies -- smaller, Dunder Mifflin-esque-sized (15-20 employees) ones -- having financial difficulties.
In each case, the company's boss or owner will call all the employees together and tell them someone's going to get laid off. But rather than the boss/owner making the decision, he or she will instead give the employees all the available information about one another -- salaries, job evaluations, etc. -- and let the employees decide who will get pink-slipped.
Oh, and, I take it that the companies don't actually get enough remuneration from Fox to keep the employee on. So it's basically a national ad showing that you and your company suck.
The complete and total distillation of the modern "conservative" credo: Screw You, I Got Mine.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 02:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:00 pm (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-AXTx4PcKI
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:00 pm (UTC)The only possible way this is redeemable is if, at the end of the show, the employees all band together and say 'screw you, we're not pink-slipping anyone!'
But I ain't holding my breath.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:19 pm (UTC)I'd settle for the employees leaving a sign which says "Take this job and shove it," or "Get your bread and circuses somewhere else."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:20 pm (UTC)Okay, maybe not. But I'm feeling extra-cynical right now.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:16 pm (UTC)This is disgusting. Fox Network releases shows like this then Fox News complains about declining morals. I hope if this show is made it will bomb. Maybe then Fox will realize people are better than that.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:21 pm (UTC)Real conservatism is, and should be, about people working hard for their success with minimal interference from the government; but working within the rules to get there. (i.e. working within safety regulations and the like). It's not, and real conservatism, never was about screw jobbing everyone you can on your way to success.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:25 pm (UTC)Then again, I expect nothing less from the Fox Network, who have a long history of this kind of crap. Hell, their biggest show, "American Idol", revels in its biggest failures.
And the sad part is...people will watch this. Mark my words. This will be a huge hit, cos people enjoy nothing more than watching other people fall.
(*turns off the TV*)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:25 pm (UTC)I'll stick to Heroes for my masochistic TV fix, thanks.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:34 pm (UTC)I heard about this on Marketplace Money this morning. Even the Tweeters at NPR are disgusted.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 03:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 04:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 04:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 04:11 pm (UTC)First, companies are based on workers relying on each other. How can people be expected to work together after this show destroys that minimal level of trust?
Second, since it's pretty obvious that the employees didn't vote on having their lives exposed this way, the show is a violation of privacy rights. "Reality shows" rely on people who sign waivers allowing them to basically be stripped naked and thrown into a pit of jackals, and there are people who do that. What about the small company employees who don't do that for this show? Are they going to have their faces blurred and be labeled as "Coward #1," "Coward #2" or something?
Third, this seems to be a parallel to the Republicans eating one another alive in the political arena. They're infighting right now like they were Democrats. This is the same thing; a big company (NewsCorp) preying on small companies (Ferd's Plastics Supply). Would any sane businessman trust his advertising dollars to a predatory...no, psychotic...operation like this?
This program concept is DOA.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 05:39 pm (UTC)Yes, that. No company of any kind would survive this sort of thing; for one that's already struggling, it's... well, the kindest interpretation is "putting it out of its misery". Unfortunately, I suspect that a more realistic decoding is "the boss is going to take the money and run, and nobody else matters".
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 05:06 pm (UTC)Gods, I can't wait until the reality show madness has run its course.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 06:43 pm (UTC)I tell ya... Is the world even WORTH saving anymore?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 05:14 pm (UTC)Because as a worker whose company has laid off people every single quarter for six quarters in a row, I REALLY wish I had a say. In fact we were talking here about how we'd like to get together and discuss it -- that we'd prefer it if we were all called into a room and told, okay, this is how much money we need to cut, you guys figure it out.
Then we could vote on things like wage cuts (we could call them recession raises!) or turning off all the freakin' lights and computers they stay on ALL THE TIME, or trucking home all the paper so it can be recycled, and thus cut down on our trash costs...or maybe laying people off. And in one case, a guy was about to leave when the layoffs occurred, and he wasn't laid off. He felt really guilty about it, because if they'd only known, they could've laid off one less person.
So honestly, I think these conversations SHOULD be occurring with the employees. We should have the right to know how our company's doing -- bottom line, revenue, expenses, everything. I'd be willing to sign something first saying I wouldn't tell competitors or anybody else.
I think I would feel violated by having tv cameras in this conversation, but I'm hoping the employees involved get paid and thus the person who gets laid off has a nice nest egg to start out. And I'm hoping the people think of those sorts of inventive solutions rather than just doing the whole "vote 'em off" thing. That's why I'll watch -- to see if they do that.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 05:54 pm (UTC)At my last office job, we had a middle manager who was brought in to "boost productivity", etc. One of those trained in management college, but with no actual experience, and certainly none dealing with actual people. She was a manipulator, playing basically everybody in the company off each other. At one point, there was a company meeting, and a lot of people had concerns: five employees had been laid off within about two weeks. Her entire addressing of the issue was to look at everybody and coolly say, "You do understand the term work-for-hire, right?"
Nobody said a damn thing. We were all enraged, and scared of losing our jobs.
Turned out, she forgot she was under a 90-day probation, just like everybody else, and the bosses got sick of her jacking everybody around, and buh-bye. I drove into work singing, "Ding Dong, The Witch Is Dead."
I'll never forget that day: Sept 10, 2001.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 05:35 pm (UTC)If I had a company this size, I would be afraid that the company would implode, unless, of course, the employees already knew this information about each other. Even without the negative advertising aspect. Sheesh!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 05:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 06:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-08 07:59 pm (UTC)it's completely something Michael would do.