mimiheart points us to
a very good summary of all that's happened, including a list of books that have had their sales rankings removed and a dissection of the "glitch" theory.
On the other side of the foofrah,
hughcasey and
siliconshaman refer to the trolling theory known as
Bantown. Which has its merits, but some folks in the comments of that thread point out that
Amazon has apparently been doing this since February.
Let's see what happens today, folks.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 11:25 am (UTC)Glitch my ass. Those asshats tried something sneaky and got caught red-handed. I expect a lot more than "oops" if they want my business back.
(Written before seeing the #glitchmyass tweet-tag.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 11:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 11:59 am (UTC)I suppose we'll have to wait until business hours today to find out more.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 12:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 12:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 12:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 12:24 pm (UTC)Also has anyone checked to see if other controversial books that would offend the same kind of people as homosexuality (ie evolution, Islam, Atheism, liberalism, etc) has had their ranking removed?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 12:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 01:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 01:07 pm (UTC)I suggest going to Amazon an giving a 5-star review to any book you feel is being affected by this.
As of 9 am, searching for 'lesbian' on Amazon returns normal results, rather that the, um, interesting results that were available over the weekend. I think we'll find out that this was a targeted attack, and the work of a few mis-guided individuals inside Amazon.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 01:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 01:49 pm (UTC)and as for the idea of whether or not it was a "Bantown" scenario being not possible because it's been happening since February?
Two words - Test Run. whoever did it tested it then and when it succeeded, began scaling the campaign for Easter. That would be my guess.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 05:46 pm (UTC)Oh, good. I'm not the only one to think of this.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 08:13 pm (UTC)Meh, I do kind of think boosting a book I might know nothing about is in the same realm of dishonesty as flagging it as 'adult' to get it out of search results.
There's enough of a problem with books on Amazon being largely rated unread for political reasons as it stands.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 02:42 pm (UTC)Sounds like someone up high is trying to Disneyfy the Internet as a whole. Maybe I'd better start up that server farm business in the Cayman Islands to protect the American Freedoms we treasure...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 03:04 pm (UTC)I now suspect trolls outside the company.
http://metafrantic.livejournal.com/131343.html
It would make sense for a company like Amazon to have a feature that automatically goes off after a certain number of customer complaints. And it makes sense that certain consortiums of asshats, the ones who try to organize mass boycotts of Disney and McDonalds for doing something gay-friendly, would exploit such a thing.
Amazon has enough goodwill with me that I'm willing to step back and watch for more evidence before throwing rocks, anyhow.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 04:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 05:19 pm (UTC)If, as some have suggested, this was outsiders abusing a poorly implemented "feature" of Amazon's system, then you could sort of define it as a glitch. You know, in a "what is the definition of is" way.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 04:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 05:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 06:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-13 08:14 pm (UTC)There's some pretty sizable communities of people on the net who kick over anthills purely for watching the problems that result from it; it's where you get stuff like those wastes of oxygen who run sites like Encyclopedia Dramatica.