The first part of this story is a consumer safety warning:
The second part is the comments to the story on Yahoo News, in which about half of the commenters talk about cheap stuff imported from China, and the other half basically keep asking the first half if they can frickin' read. My favorite comment is, "these glasses Were not made in the USA!!! They were made in New Jersey!!!" (In fact, the company is a U.S. affiliate of a French company, so it would take a little more digging than I really feel like doing to determine who decided what paint would be used for the glasses and where they were located. But it ain't China.)
This is really the problem, isn't it? You can put something literally right in front of people -- the U.S. manufacture of the glasses was mentioned in the first sentence of the story -- and they'll continue on with their already-internalized conclusions. I'm guilty of it myself.
Anyway. Don't get the Shrek glasses, and take 'em back to McD's if you already have 'em. Or box 'em up and sell 'em on eBay in five years. Somethin'.
Cadmium has been discovered in the painted design on "Shrek"-themed drinking glasses being sold nationwide at McDonald's, forcing the burger giant to recall 12 million of the cheap U.S.-made collectibles while dramatically expanding contamination concerns about the toxic metal beyond imported children's jewelry.[Emphasis mine.]
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, which announced the voluntary recall early Friday, warned consumers to immediately stop using the glasses; McDonald's said it would post instructions on its website next week regarding refunds.
The second part is the comments to the story on Yahoo News, in which about half of the commenters talk about cheap stuff imported from China, and the other half basically keep asking the first half if they can frickin' read. My favorite comment is, "these glasses Were not made in the USA!!! They were made in New Jersey!!!" (In fact, the company is a U.S. affiliate of a French company, so it would take a little more digging than I really feel like doing to determine who decided what paint would be used for the glasses and where they were located. But it ain't China.)
This is really the problem, isn't it? You can put something literally right in front of people -- the U.S. manufacture of the glasses was mentioned in the first sentence of the story -- and they'll continue on with their already-internalized conclusions. I'm guilty of it myself.
Anyway. Don't get the Shrek glasses, and take 'em back to McD's if you already have 'em. Or box 'em up and sell 'em on eBay in five years. Somethin'.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 11:26 am (UTC)1. Are they (the CPSC) only worried about cadmium exposure in children or is it not necessarily safe for adults either?
2. Are the Shrek glasses from the previous movie promotion at McDonald's made by the same manufacturer? If so, should people toss those also? (Yes, I thought the previous movie was good and bought a glass because I thought the images were cute.)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 11:33 am (UTC)2. Dunno. If they are, I bet it'll come out by the end of the day.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 11:50 am (UTC)It may go something like this:
1. People are scared of the Chinese.
2. Since they aren't actually waging a war against us at the moment, they must be doing something else, those sneaky et cetera.
3. Aha! They're trying to poison our kids with cheap children's toys! Won't somebody please think of the children, and so on.
4. Therefore any cheap and poisonous children's toys must obviously be Chinese, even if they're not. Or French, of course. (I can't speak for the fiendish New Jerseians.)
You see it in other well-established areas of contention as well. People who aren't emotionally invested in either side of an argument boggle at it, but it's just part of being human.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 12:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 01:02 pm (UTC)No, you're right, that sequence of thoughts is dumb, but only if you see it laid out for examination like that. I can imagine that a really top-flight brain (like what I don't have) could skip from one to four so quickly as not to notice, especially if the owner's bigotry about the people in question were forceful enough. (Can smart people be bigoted? I think they can.) And, as the other commenter says, China has been in the news about such things before.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 07:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-05 07:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 12:48 pm (UTC)1. China has, in fact, been in the news concerning various things over the past few years that contain poisons, causing scandals both internally and in export markets.
2. Therefore if it contains poisons, it's most likely from China.
Still wrong, but doesn't require a belief in conspiracy.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 03:25 pm (UTC)People are a touch afraid of China, but fear keeps people in chcekc, so governments across the world use it. Rule #4: Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. They're like cattle: one prod and they move as one. In this case, the prod was 'CHINA EVIL! BAD CHINA!' You are indeed correct in this.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-05 10:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 12:56 am (UTC)The Spousal Unit responded to this, "Must be a New Yorker!"
I've also heard of bureaucrats responding haughtily to requests by people from New Mexico that they are not going to fulfill any requests from a foreign country. (!)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 12:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 12:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 01:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 12:48 pm (UTC)We all know that BP is Chinese or French or something (possibly Mexican too)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 02:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 02:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 04:33 pm (UTC)EastasiaNew Jersey."(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 12:50 pm (UTC)I have them sitting on the shelf; thankfully we haven't used them yet, since I doubt that's good for a kid with heart problems.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 01:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 01:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 02:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 04:36 pm (UTC)"In the case of the Shrek-themed glassware, the potential danger would be long-term exposure to low levels of cadmium, which could leach from the paint onto a child's hand, then enter the body if the child puts that unwashed hand to his or her mouth."
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 02:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 03:50 pm (UTC)The lab where I used to work tested a lot of decorated glassware for lead and cadmium levels. Our Business Development (Sales) person that specialized in that market got in some promotionional mugs with our companies logo on them to give out to prospective customers. Just as a lark we analysed one and it was way over on acceptible lead levels. We got a big laugh out of it. Needless to say he didn't hand out those mugs.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 04:25 pm (UTC)I haven't seen any TV commercials for the glasses either.
Has anyone seen the movie? I noticed that in the previews Shrek has drifted away from its origins. It used to be switching the hero/villain stereotypes with an evil prince and heroic ogre. Now they're back to using the traditional fairy tale villains like witches and Rumpelstiltskin. So it's not fun anymore.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 05:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-04 09:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-05 12:01 am (UTC)1) These days everything is made in China.
2) Chinese stuff has dangerously high levels of poison in it.
3) McDonald's, like lots of other companies, farms out manufacture of its cheap crap to the cheapest contractor (i.e., China).
4) McDonald's glasses are poisonous? Chinese crap!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-05 02:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 12:17 am (UTC)Yep. Sarcasm.