Navigation
Page Summary
aiela.livejournal.com - (no subject)
archiver-tim.livejournal.com - (no subject)
redaxe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
the-magician.livejournal.com - (no subject)
docwebster.livejournal.com - (no subject)
palenoue.livejournal.com - (no subject)
drzarron.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nelladarren.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roman-mclaze.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Fluid Measure by
- Theme: Warm Embrace by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-01 11:51 pm (UTC)Sad that only three have been made so far, but it looks good enough that I'm hoping it will get picked up for more.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-02 12:00 am (UTC)I like the new, effective shortcut in storytelling, where what is appearing on a cell phone is appearing on the screen without have to switch to an insert shot of someone holding it, so that it looks convincing that both character and camera see it.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-02 12:51 am (UTC)Not entirely sure I like all of the showing Sherlock's thought process techniques. On the one hand, it's clear, and modern. On the other hand, it gets old quickly. And on the gripping hand, it's lots clearer than past efforts, where we see an object and have no idea what it is about it that he's noticing.
M had something of a fit about the identity of the man in the suit. I personally think that if we're reimagining the character(s), that's within bounds. And besides, it was a nice red herring for the middle of the episode.
Off to watch folks cook.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-02 01:08 am (UTC)my only quibble with it (even stronger in the second episode) is that it shows Sherlock being so focused in his own thought processes that he's missing things, particularly things that Watson knows/has spotted.
Also, like some of the SH stories, there are deductions made with a single solution that I watch and think "well, it could be that, but there's another explanation for that as well which Sherlock either hasn't noticed or has discarded for some reason but we, the audience, aren't being told about it"
I do like little touches like a Chinese woman saying something in ?Mandarin? and Holmes translating it ("spider") ... and Holmes knowing that a particular phone or watch came out in the last six months, showing he's keeping up to date with contemporary culture, at least as far as technology is concerned ... and yes, he has his own computer :-)
Haven't seen him playing the violin yet though!
Sure there are things that don't ring quite true in our real world (the road outside 221b Baker Street is much busier), it's really unlikely that you could send the same text to two dozen mobile phones and have it appear on all of them near enough simultaneously ... and it's amusing seeing the location London stuff inserted into all the stuff they actually film in Cardiff.
Not convinced by Mark Gatiss/man in suit yet ... but I'll wait and see what happens in episode 3 ... and won't be at all surprised by the identity of "M_" :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-02 02:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-02 02:59 am (UTC)I also like how they incorporate modern technology, from the text messages to the phone tracking. Most writers would shy away from it, remove cell phones entirely or never have anyone use the internet, but these people include it all in a way that deepens the mystery. Well done!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-02 03:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-02 04:34 am (UTC)After having watched the first episode I'm rather down with it though, because it's well done and ok, it's not the first OR will be the last TV series with an SH-like character, at least they're calling him Sherlock.
Also it was a bit like The Big Bang Theory with fewer laughs.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-02 05:25 am (UTC)