filkertom: (Default)
[personal profile] filkertom
Ben Quayle (yes, the son of Dan) gives his carefully-thought-out opinion on Barack Obama.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ebenbrooks.livejournal.com
I like your headdesk icon. Do you like mine?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Hee. Yep! Although the messaging may be a bit more obscure.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chipuni.livejournal.com
Yeah! Obama is worse than James Buchanan, who saw seven states seceed! And Obama is worse than Warren Harding and the Teapot Dome scandal! And he's worse than Richard Nixon's Watergate, too!

(Does Ben Quayle have no sense of history?)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
He's the son of Dan and Marilyn. I suspect your last two words are, shall we say, unnecessary.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annearchy.livejournal.com
Superflous, one might say :)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 07:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] old-fortissimo.livejournal.com
Dan AND Marilyn raised that: Mr. Potato(e)Head, Jr.

Murphy Brown, as a single mother, could not possibly have done worse.

And it's bad, bad, Murphy Brown... you know, you wait long enough, you can recycle everything!

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 12:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arensb.livejournal.com
I'm pretty sure that in Republicans' minds, the calendar just leaped from Jan. 2001 to Jan. 2009.

Either that, or they actually believed Karl Rove when he told them it was raining.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-14 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dan-ad-nauseam.livejournal.com
He's worse than Franklin Pierce, the northerner who lobbied for the KS-NE Act and then failed to prevent the resulting violence.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 10:53 pm (UTC)
ext_68422: (Default)
From: [identity profile] mimiheart.livejournal.com
He's running in my district. It's always nice when there's an idiot I can consciously not vote for.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arensb.livejournal.com
If you lived in AZ-1, you could consciously not vote for Tom Zaleski (google "ZALESKI4CONGRES Roger Ebert" if you're not familiar).

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purpleranger.livejournal.com
Well, I think the perjuring adulterer from Arkansas is probably worse, but I tend to agree with most of what he said.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 12:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] admnaismith.livejournal.com

ROFLMAO! You made me snort milk!

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 11:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] docwebster.livejournal.com
"Bin Laden determined to strike in U.S."

Nothing else need be said.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 11:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dornbeast.livejournal.com
It's a measure of how punchy I am that my first thought was, "Al-Quaeda Local #346 on Strike; Demanding more houri."

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 12:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] docwebster.livejournal.com
"Dyslexic Marines storm Bloomingdales after reports of Bed Linen on fourth floor."

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 01:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saganth.livejournal.com
*fallsoverlaughinggoesthud!*

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-12 11:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zellion.livejournal.com
Wow, my first thought was that he's a bit of a hottie. Can we have a campaign with him and Palin as running mates and their platform can be "good looking but batshit crazy" ?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 12:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arensb.livejournal.com
Where do Michele Bachmann and Alan Keyes fit into this scheme of yours?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zellion.livejournal.com
I don't know enough about either to testify of their sanity or lack thereof, I'm afraid.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arensb.livejournal.com
Oh, they're both quite batshit crazy.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-14 01:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teddywolf.livejournal.com
But not, and this is the point of the previous oration, good looking.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] admnaismith.livejournal.com

My. He's certainly got the shallow-eyed, English-mangling, born-on-third-base-and-thinks-he-hit-a-triple thing down.

I couldn't help feeling a little sorry for Li'l Danforth from 2001 through 2008. Can you imagine what the poor guy must have gone through every time he saw George of the Bungle explainifying and misunderestimating and fooling people twice-won't get fooled again deciding the decisions and and putting food on workers' families and falling off segues? All the while knowing that he (Danforth) had been laughed off the stage for the exact same gaffes and bumbles?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 05:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dornbeast.livejournal.com
J. Danforth Quayle. A man ahead of his time.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pandoradeloeste.livejournal.com
born-on-third-base-and-thinks-he-hit-a-triple

This has got to be the best analogy of privilege I've ever heard. I'm totally using it instead of "invisible knapsack" the next time I have to explain privilege.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] admnaismith.livejournal.com

I believe the phrase originated with the late, great Ann richards, who said it about George Bush, the other guy on the Bush-Quayle ticket.

About Quayle, she said "He was born with a silver foot in his mouth."

Obvious question

Date: 2010-08-13 03:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strredwolf.livejournal.com
Wait, Dan *BRED* offspring?!?

Re: Obvious question

Date: 2010-08-13 03:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capplor.livejournal.com
Breeding, as frogs, flatworms & mayflies show us, does not require much intelligence.

Re: Obvious question

Date: 2010-08-13 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] admnaismith.livejournal.com
The proof that he climaxed was that he dropped his Wall Street Journal.
Edited Date: 2010-08-13 04:28 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 03:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capplor.livejournal.com
The fun here in Colorado is that the upcoming gubernatorial campaign will be a three way between John Hickenlooper (I think I spelled that right) the current Mayor of Denver in the Democrat's corner. Dan no free bikes in MY state Maies (I KNOW I misspelled that) in the Republican corner. & Good old Tom Tancredo (yes, that Tom Tancredo) in the "I want to spoil it for everybody" corner.

I'm looking forward to many things to laugh at & hopefully nothing to cry about.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 04:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] admnaismith.livejournal.com
With Colorado trending blue anyhow and two teatards splitting the certifiable Grade-A kook vote, it would seem that Hickenlooper would be safe and that once again the Republicans have rescued the Democrats from themselves by refusing to be a viable alternative, even to thinking conservatives who hate Democrats. The same is happening with Oregon's Governor's race. Good luck.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ldyerzsie.livejournal.com
The Reps may yet have a "viable" alternative. Mitch Daniels is now "open" to possibilty of a presidential run in 2012. And he looks respectable, his state is somewhat solvent, and he can speak well. Of course, Indiana is solvent because you have one person doing 3 peoples' jobs (at least), and we have "benefits" that are causing us--the workers--to lose money. He is also in the process of cutting out every one of the costless benefits that make the low pay worth it. I expect he'll get the idea to make us pay for parking before he leaves office.

And yes, I can complain. I voted in the last election. Against Daniels. Not because I liked the opposition, necessarily, but because Daniels broke his promises to the workers, and some of the other things I saw and see as a state worker. He has no respect for those of us in the trenches and no idea what regular people go thru.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] admnaismith.livejournal.com

That's the 2012 national ticket. I was talking about this year. I was talking about specific statewide races this year, and the amazing number of instances (Senate races in NV, KY, FL, CO, PA, CA; Governor races in CO, OR, CT, AZ. Maybe others) that have gone from "very bad for Democrats" to "tossup" or from "tossup" to "likely Dem", not because the Democrats are doing anything brilliant to save themselves, but because Republicans are nominating people so unprecedentedly crazy, stupid and mean that no one but the most hardcore right wing fanatic would ever vote for them. In many cases, solid, well-known Republicans with good reputations, who would have been favored to win a general election in an off-year when Democrats were in the majority and taking the heat for America's problems, were rejected in the primary in favor of teatards (Rob Simmons in CY, Trey Grayson in Kentucky, Scott McInnis on Colorado), or even forced to leave the party entirely for the crime of having a fully functional brain and actually wanting to support the government they want to be part of instead of destroying everything in sight (Crist in Florida, Specter in Pennsylvania).

As for Daniels, I don't know much about him, but he's got a big problem, as does any other establishment Republican. If he seems respectable, as you say, the Republican base will flee him in droves in favor of Hucklebee or Palin or whoever panders to Teh Crazy, and he won't win primaries. If he's serious and respectable instead of charismatic, he also won't be noticed by the majority, for the same reasons serious intellectuals like Tsongas and Dukakis failed. But then, if he DOES pander to the base, nobody BUT the base will vote for him, in part because he'll look like any other hack who changes his pitch ans just says whatever he thinks the electorate du jour wants to hear.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ldyerzsie.livejournal.com
He is somewhat charismatic. Otherwise he wouldn't have won a second term here. By 2012 Daniels may well be able to win the national ticket. Especially if he can keep Indiana from financial implosion, no matter how he goes about it. Of course, being as familiar as I am with HOW he achieves that "financial stability" he touts so much, I am sure as HELL not voting for him.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-14 01:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teddywolf.livejournal.com
If he's serious and respectable instead of charismatic, he also won't be noticed by the majority, for the same reasons serious intellectuals like Tsongas and Dukakis failed.

Err... you do know that Tsongas and Dukakis were/are both Massachusetts Democrats, right?
They both did pretty well here in Massachusetts because we like serious and respectable with a strong side of thoughtful. Or at least male with good hair, like TwitMitt Romney.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-19 05:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dan-ad-nauseam.livejournal.com
I'm worried about Oregon. Unless Dudley continues to shoot himself in the foot by refusing to debate, he might win this. Kitzhaber isn't lighting fires in Portland.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 04:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] liddle-oldman.livejournal.com
*eyeroll*

And I see Birthers in the comments, too, so we have the full set.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-13 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annearchy.livejournal.com
I see the apple didn't fall far from THAT tree. Or, to use a Quaylian term, the potatoe didn't sprout far from...the other potatoe :P

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 07:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios