Navigation
Page Summary
ebenbrooks.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chipuni.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mimiheart.livejournal.com - (no subject)
purpleranger.livejournal.com - (no subject)
docwebster.livejournal.com - (no subject)
zellion.livejournal.com - (no subject)
admnaismith.livejournal.com - (no subject)
strredwolf.livejournal.com - Obvious question
capplor.livejournal.com - (no subject)
liddle-oldman.livejournal.com - (no subject)
annearchy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Fluid Measure by
- Theme: Warm Embrace by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 10:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 10:25 pm (UTC)(Does Ben Quayle have no sense of history?)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 10:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 04:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 07:21 pm (UTC)Murphy Brown, as a single mother, could not possibly have done worse.
And it's bad, bad, Murphy Brown... you know, you wait long enough, you can recycle everything!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 12:43 am (UTC)Either that, or they actually believed Karl Rove when he told them it was raining.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-14 03:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 10:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 12:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 11:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 12:15 am (UTC)ROFLMAO! You made me snort milk!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 11:21 pm (UTC)Nothing else need be said.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 11:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 12:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 01:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-12 11:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 12:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 01:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 01:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-14 01:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 12:14 am (UTC)My. He's certainly got the shallow-eyed, English-mangling, born-on-third-base-and-thinks-he-hit-a-triple thing down.
I couldn't help feeling a little sorry for Li'l Danforth from 2001 through 2008. Can you imagine what the poor guy must have gone through every time he saw George of the Bungle explainifying and misunderestimating and fooling people twice-won't get fooled again deciding the decisions and and putting food on workers' families and falling off segues? All the while knowing that he (Danforth) had been laughed off the stage for the exact same gaffes and bumbles?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 05:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 02:43 pm (UTC)This has got to be the best analogy of privilege I've ever heard. I'm totally using it instead of "invisible knapsack" the next time I have to explain privilege.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 04:29 pm (UTC)I believe the phrase originated with the late, great Ann richards, who said it about George Bush, the other guy on the Bush-Quayle ticket.
About Quayle, she said "He was born with a silver foot in his mouth."
Obvious question
Date: 2010-08-13 03:04 am (UTC)Re: Obvious question
Date: 2010-08-13 03:34 am (UTC)Re: Obvious question
Date: 2010-08-13 04:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 03:39 am (UTC)I'm looking forward to many things to laugh at & hopefully nothing to cry about.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 04:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 02:32 pm (UTC)And yes, I can complain. I voted in the last election. Against Daniels. Not because I liked the opposition, necessarily, but because Daniels broke his promises to the workers, and some of the other things I saw and see as a state worker. He has no respect for those of us in the trenches and no idea what regular people go thru.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 04:48 pm (UTC)That's the 2012 national ticket. I was talking about this year. I was talking about specific statewide races this year, and the amazing number of instances (Senate races in NV, KY, FL, CO, PA, CA; Governor races in CO, OR, CT, AZ. Maybe others) that have gone from "very bad for Democrats" to "tossup" or from "tossup" to "likely Dem", not because the Democrats are doing anything brilliant to save themselves, but because Republicans are nominating people so unprecedentedly crazy, stupid and mean that no one but the most hardcore right wing fanatic would ever vote for them. In many cases, solid, well-known Republicans with good reputations, who would have been favored to win a general election in an off-year when Democrats were in the majority and taking the heat for America's problems, were rejected in the primary in favor of teatards (Rob Simmons in CY, Trey Grayson in Kentucky, Scott McInnis on Colorado), or even forced to leave the party entirely for the crime of having a fully functional brain and actually wanting to support the government they want to be part of instead of destroying everything in sight (Crist in Florida, Specter in Pennsylvania).
As for Daniels, I don't know much about him, but he's got a big problem, as does any other establishment Republican. If he seems respectable, as you say, the Republican base will flee him in droves in favor of Hucklebee or Palin or whoever panders to Teh Crazy, and he won't win primaries. If he's serious and respectable instead of charismatic, he also won't be noticed by the majority, for the same reasons serious intellectuals like Tsongas and Dukakis failed. But then, if he DOES pander to the base, nobody BUT the base will vote for him, in part because he'll look like any other hack who changes his pitch ans just says whatever he thinks the electorate du jour wants to hear.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 05:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-14 01:37 am (UTC)Err... you do know that Tsongas and Dukakis were/are both Massachusetts Democrats, right?
They both did pretty well here in Massachusetts because we like serious and respectable with a strong side of thoughtful. Or at least male with good hair, like
TwitMitt Romney.(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-19 05:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 04:01 am (UTC)And I see Birthers in the comments, too, so we have the full set.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-13 04:02 pm (UTC)