I have no idea what the hell's happened to my country.
What the fuck is wrong with these insane assholes who have to control women's bodies and sexuality, force people to alter their lives, save fetuses they don't give a shit about once the kid is born, and stick their noses in everyone else's business? Because their God tells them to? That little First Amendment thing just doesn't mean what it says, after all.
It doesn't even matter that this is as unconstitutional as it gets. It's that the nutbars are so thoroughly in charge of the asylum, the rational is so thoroughly divorced from the actual conversation, that this foul creature feels he can comfortably submit a bill like this, one that would make it legal to kill someone performing, or possibly even getting, a legal medical procedure. Oh, yeah, that's "pro-life".
Jayzus fucking fuck.
A law under consideration in South Dakota would expand the definition of “justifiable homicide” to include killings that are intended to prevent harm to a fetus—a move that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions. The Republican-backed legislation, House Bill 1171, has passed out of committee on a nine-to-three party-line vote, and is expected to face a floor vote in the state’s GOP-dominated House of Representatives soon.I bet this ratbastard wants smaller government, too.
The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Phil Jensen, a committed foe of abortion rights, alters the state’s legal definition of justifiable homicide by adding language stating that a homicide is permissible if committed by a person “while resisting an attempt to harm” that person’s unborn child or the unborn child of that person’s spouse, partner, parent, or child. If the bill passes, it could in theory allow a woman’s father, mother, son, daughter, or husband to kill anyone who tried to provide that woman an abortion—even if she wanted one.
What the fuck is wrong with these insane assholes who have to control women's bodies and sexuality, force people to alter their lives, save fetuses they don't give a shit about once the kid is born, and stick their noses in everyone else's business? Because their God tells them to? That little First Amendment thing just doesn't mean what it says, after all.
It doesn't even matter that this is as unconstitutional as it gets. It's that the nutbars are so thoroughly in charge of the asylum, the rational is so thoroughly divorced from the actual conversation, that this foul creature feels he can comfortably submit a bill like this, one that would make it legal to kill someone performing, or possibly even getting, a legal medical procedure. Oh, yeah, that's "pro-life".
Jayzus fucking fuck.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 08:53 pm (UTC)I'm just beat...between Indiana trying to make shit worse for homosexuals, and then this...I'm trying to figure where on the PLANET I can go where people respect each other, even when they disagree..and overall believe in individual rights.
*shakes head* Ugh.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:53 pm (UTC)(I'm an ex-pat American living in Hamburg, Germany for the last 4 years)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 08:59 pm (UTC)Humans aren't nice, tolerant, peaceable critters, and never have been. Killing each other for small things has historically been the norm.
Extra Headdesk Just For You
Date: 2011-02-15 09:10 pm (UTC)THE REASON WE HAVE LAWS is to make people behave within a certain set of what we laughingly call "civilized behavior". So that our lives aren't day-in, day-out street fights, raids for food or clothes or trinkets or DVDs, constant rape sessions, etc. Not that they would be anyway, as most people seem to be able to get along without somehow befouling the communal nest.
Saying people generally suck, it's just human nature, etc., etc., is in no way helpful. For example, are you the type likely to kill someone for small things? Feel like bumping off a shopowner who marked up the chips an extra fifty cents? Or, to keep it on topic, have you had the urge to take an AK-47 to a Planned Parenthood office lately?
I'm not the type to go back over your many comments here, nor to haunt your LJ and discern your typical thoughts on these matters, so I can't help but ask: Is that how you maintain your equilibrium in a constantly-outraging world? By shrugging and saying, "That's the way it is"? Because, if it is, fine, dandy, I'll know not to ask again.
Re: Extra Headdesk Just For You
From:Re: Extra Headdesk Just For You
From:Re: Extra Headdesk Just For You
From:Re: Extra Headdesk Just For You
From:Re: Extra Headdesk Just For You
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:17 pm (UTC)It is.
I think they should pass a law that says they can only pass one new law per year... Preferably one that has nothing to do with women or children.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:41 pm (UTC)That they call themselves "pro-life" just galls.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:43 pm (UTC)"while resisting an attempt to harm"
Not abort. Not even kill. Harm.
That is a barn door SO wide open.
Anyone who runs a clinic that performs abortions could be presumed to be making an attempt to harm the unborn, even if the unborn isn't actually due to be aborted.
Anyone who advises a pregnant woman about abortion options is making an attempt to harm the unborn.
It could even get so far as someone arguing that anyone who advocates the right to an abortion is themselves seeking the harm of the unborn- in short, open season on liberals.
And this is a case I do NOT want getting before the current Supreme Court. Anthony Kennedy might well side with the conservatives in ruling that civil rights (such as the right to live) begin at conception- thus overturning Roe v. Wade regardless of what else is done with the case in question.
But this is what happens when (a) religious zealots gain control of what amounts to half the political system of an entire nation, (b) said nation allows no practical option for competition in elections beyond the two established ruling parties, and (c) the media marketplace allows the zealots to run multiple news media propaganda channels without producing a strong counter-propaganda system to compete with it. Political discourse has been steadily pushed farther and farther to the right- to the point that a supposedly liberal Democratic President was only barely persuaded not to advocate cuts to Social Security in his proposed budget.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:59 pm (UTC)Anyone selling alcohol to a pregnant woman.
Anyone releasing industrial pollution near a pregnant woman.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:47 pm (UTC)This is a good time for "NEVER AGAIN!"
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 02:13 am (UTC)while we were pumping blood into her as fast as we could
That must have been horrific. Thank you for trying to help her, even if you couldn't save her.
Other proposed laws
Date: 2011-02-15 09:50 pm (UTC)http://www.firedupmissouri.com/content/jane-cunningham-says-enough-our-stupid-child-labor-laws-already
Once I was a true independant voter. Lately I assme republican = corrupt, crazy, or both; democrat = incompetant; and libertaian = self-satisfied with no compassion.
Re: Other proposed laws
Date: 2011-02-15 10:50 pm (UTC)I should've known better.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 09:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 05:26 am (UTC)And 1984 wasn't intended as a manifesto.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 10:02 pm (UTC)Riiiiiight.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 10:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 10:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 11:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 11:27 pm (UTC)(I don't remember where this comes from, unfortunately, or else I'd attribute it. Possibly here.)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 11:35 pm (UTC)I guess I should brush up on my Spanish and move South. Canada's too damn cold for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 04:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 11:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-15 11:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 12:17 am (UTC)A woman who's pregnant has been having sex after all. So according to Rose, she doesn't have an expectation of doctor/patient confidentiality, unbiased medical care, or people helping translate for her. And now according to Jensen's defense of his own bill, it's not supposed to be about killing abortion doctors, it's supposed to be "allowing" women to defend themselves from someone who, say, might be beating her to end the pregnancy.
Because, of course, once the tart got knocked up, she apparently has no more right to defend HERSELF from deadly force.
It's not about the so-called innocent baby. It's about making sure that women learn that they can't have sex and keep their personal rights to ANYTHING, including self-defense.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 12:41 am (UTC)Slightly facetious here, but it's too bad there's not a way to make that one backfire. I'm thinking there must be a variation on Lysistrata that would apply.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 12:48 am (UTC)Hmmm...you know, that might make a good story to write one of these days. DIBS!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 01:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 12:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 01:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 01:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 02:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 03:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 04:24 am (UTC)The economy is still hemorraging, we're still enmeshed in two unnecessary wars, families are losing their homes and livelihoods, and THIS is all they can think of to do?
Neropublicans -- fiddling with trivial shit while America burns around them.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 06:06 am (UTC)Tom T.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 07:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 02:24 pm (UTC)~*::Meow::*~
(no subject)
Date: 2011-02-16 05:47 pm (UTC)If I had the money, I'd go to some concierge hospital and get a uterine hysterectomy and pay to be allowed to keep the uterus afterward, so I could film myself stabbing it repeatedly and upload it to YouTube as a political statement.
This is why $DEITY conspires to never let me win the lottery.