Take a look at this. Take a good, long, steamy gawk.
Ah, our elevated discourse. I did notice that the article touches on the sexist aspects, but sorta glosses over the racist aspects. Not to mention the amateur-night "production values".
I seem to remember at some point in the 70s and 80s, and even into the 90s, that this country wasn't overwhelmed with racism, stupidity, and utter bullshit, at least not on an hourly basis. Obviously, my memory is wrong.
Ah, our elevated discourse. I did notice that the article touches on the sexist aspects, but sorta glosses over the racist aspects. Not to mention the amateur-night "production values".
I seem to remember at some point in the 70s and 80s, and even into the 90s, that this country wasn't overwhelmed with racism, stupidity, and utter bullshit, at least not on an hourly basis. Obviously, my memory is wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 04:46 pm (UTC)Why is the country going backwards?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 04:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 04:50 pm (UTC)the lefttheir opponentsanyone sane.(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 05:36 pm (UTC)http://www.newser.com/story/121136/offensive-ads-creator-to-critics-suck-it.html
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 06:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 05:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 06:02 pm (UTC)http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/06/15/245985/give-us-your-cash-bitch-ad/
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 06:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 06:27 pm (UTC)crappy - check
sexist - check
racist - check
stupid - check
lies - check
bull*hit - check
officially disowned by GOP candidate - Check and checkmate!
Yeah, pretty much business as usual with them.
It doesn't matter if the majority think it's bull... just as long as enough people buy into it and are enraged enough to vote for them.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 06:58 pm (UTC)Stay classy USA PAC, stay all kinds of classy.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 07:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 08:06 pm (UTC)Oh, and according to the right, THIS ad is fine, but THIS ad...
THIS ad is "mean" and "offensive".
What... A bunch... Of fucking... Pussies!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 09:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 12:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 12:57 am (UTC)That being said, I really have to comment on the term, "Politically Correct":
You see, I am the co-inventor of the term. Back in 1970 at a conference of Underground Newspaper reporters and editors, a bunch of us (including myself and a guy who's now known as the essayist who was the Rolling Stone imbedded reporter during the First Gulf War) did a series of skits on what America was going to be like "after the Revolution."
The two of us looked at the situation in Stalinist Russia and put on a satire for the conference on how the New Left was going to set up re-education camps for Nixon and the rest of the GOP and not let them go until they were all "Politically Correct", which was a term that had been translated directly from the Russian.
In other words, the whole concept was meant to be a joke on the radicals around us, (which included Panthers, SDS, and assorted other crazies) poking fun at the fact that they were just as intolerant as the folks they were trying to replace. Not too far-fetched an idea, since the first thing revolutionaries normally do when they gain power is shoot all of their allies.
Anyway, that's where the term comes from and what we meant it to mean. What's been done since to it horrifies me, especially since some Leftists in the 80s co-opted it to mean "The Way Things Ought To Be." I am just as horrified by modern conservatives using the term as an excuse to be rude, even if I do agree with them that religious folks, white folks, and male folks are currently getting the short end of the stick.
Best always,
Tom Trumpinski
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 02:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 03:03 am (UTC)Tom T.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 03:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 05:18 am (UTC)B) ..."Pussies." Oh, right. Because we mustn't ever forget for a minute that the worst thing in the world, ever, is to be a woman.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 06:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 01:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 02:54 pm (UTC)English being what it was, I am sure that there were others that put the two words together before 1970. The present satirical derivation (from Russian) can be traced to those of us at the meeting.
Tom T,
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 10:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-15 10:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 12:11 am (UTC)Plus, so much eww.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 01:37 am (UTC)Perhaps they were trying to push Poe's Law as far as it would go?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 01:51 am (UTC)Of course, it may be very effective. :-(
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 01:53 am (UTC)To be honest I'm not really surprised by the monosylabic nature of his reply.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 05:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 06:09 am (UTC)Even passing up everything people here have said
Date: 2011-06-16 01:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 06:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-16 08:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-18 08:31 pm (UTC)