Leslie and I are at the Ramada just off the I-71 in Columbus, for a first-year con called Ba-Con. I think it'll be a lot of fun -- it's kinda like PenguiCon, i.e., both open source and sf/f (with a preponderance of steampunk), but with more smoked meat. And, my liaison B.J. brought me my guest bag... which included an official ThinkGeek My First Bacon. I has a delight.
Who's gonna be here? Or, if not, what's your plan for the weekend?
Who's gonna be here? Or, if not, what's your plan for the weekend?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 07:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 07:49 pm (UTC)..."the I-71"? Interesting terminology. I know Michiganders who have used "the M-4" (or whatever number) for *state* highways in Michigan but didn't know the usage extended to Interstates. Is the usage primarily a Michigan thing? What about US highways (such as US-12)?
("The [number]" with no prefix appears to be a Californianism. Which makes it a repeating LOLworthy Moment when NCIS talks about "the 95" when referring to the Very Long East Coast Interstate.)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 07:53 pm (UTC)I also had an interview today with an interesting company. The guy used the word "intense" like a dozen times while talking. Sort of scared me a little. But they want to move fast and seemed impressed with things. So who knows.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 07:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 08:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 08:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 08:27 pm (UTC)In the Mid-Atlantic, highway numbers don't take the definite article: I-80, US-15, Route 10. "Route" might also mean a US or interstate: e.g. "route 66" around here is I-66, and "Route One" is US-1 unless you're in Delaware. ("Highway" is more common than "Route" down in the Carolinas and up in Ontario.) And any prefix/title might be omitted entirely, though less often for interstates: the Baltimore Beltway is often called just "695", f'r'ex.
Bob Marbourg (http://www.wtop.com/?nid=635&sid=2247966), dean of DC traffic reporters, often uses both number AND name for highways if both are well known to the locals. (Of course, around here the best course of action is not to drive anywhere within 50 miles of DC if you can avoid it.)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 08:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 09:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 09:42 pm (UTC)Question for you: Do you know of anyone in Chicago looking for a tech writing contract? Got a call today and asked for the recruiter to send me the info and I'd noise it about...I don't live anywhere near the Chicago Loop where this would be but I don't mind boosting the signal.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 10:35 pm (UTC)40-45-55-70-HIKE!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 10:37 pm (UTC)It just seems normal to me, since I've lived here my entire life.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 10:42 pm (UTC)O.K. Your small, independently-owned jewelry store was recently purchased by a conglomerate with a completely different focus (fast food), when the new companies rep is in town, she doesn't bother to come into your store, and your company benefits are handled by a rep in a different state (even though there's an HR office for the new owners IN THE BUILDING!) And you don't think this MIGHT be an issue?!
I told her I didn't think this was a "good fit" for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-08 11:45 pm (UTC)Laundry and listening to some of the recordings from Contata and getting copies to some of the performers is on the higher planned list for this weekend. There are a few songs I really need to check how the sounded just because the room sounded great.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-09 12:03 am (UTC)I was getting set to say I didn't have any number-to-name mappings for the Detroit area, when I realized I actually still do (the ones I can remember right off are Woodward/M-1, John C. Lodge/M-10, Southfield Freeway/M-39, Telegraph Rd/US 24, and Walter P. Reuther Expressway/I-696). But then I did use those a lot.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-09 01:58 am (UTC)Getting my [expletive]ing internet fixed.
And I'm getting set loose with a weed-whacker again on Sunday (weather permitting)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-09 02:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-09 02:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-09 02:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-09 04:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-09 04:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-11 04:36 pm (UTC)He was a delight to have in attendance, and We hope to have a long lasting relationship with him and us.
No, no, not THAT kind of relationship!! 8)
Thank you Tom, for songs, good times, merriment, and life long memories!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-11 04:37 pm (UTC)