(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-21 04:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ravenclaw-eric.livejournal.com
Looks like the Foglios won again. And well-deserved...

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-21 04:15 pm (UTC)
sdelmonte: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sdelmonte
Phil then announced he will not be in the running next year, to give someone else a chance.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-21 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com
When Playboy gave out their Jazz (and later, Rock/Pop) Awards, they had a policy that anyone who won a category a set number (three or five, I think) of times was placed in a Hall of Fame in that category and ineligible thereafter. I always thought that was reasonable, and would love to see other awards adopt it (including the Pegasi). It both acknowledges the person who's won all those times, and allows others to compete. (If the FHoF folks objected to the terminology, I'd suggest calling it Emeritus status, instead.)

The only disadvantage is that you don't get impressive achievements like Charles Brown's 21 Hugos for Locus. I think the net benefits are worth it, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-22 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsittingstill.livejournal.com
This strikes me as a good idea.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-21 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sveethot.livejournal.com
Congratulations to all. Our lives are made richer by your efforts.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-21 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bryanp.livejournal.com
Congrats to everyone, even the ones I disagree with (Inception??? Really?)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-22 04:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com
I know. Saccharine as it was (in spots), I would have voted wholehearted;y for Toy Story 3 (and deferred any HP love until next year).

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-22 03:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lemmozine.livejournal.com
Is there a place where they show how many votes went to each nominee? I heard a very interesting rumor but I wouldn't want to repeat nonpublished and nonverified information.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-22 04:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com
Yes. From http://renovationsf.org comes this PDF file with those detailed statistics.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-22 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lemmozine.livejournal.com
In that case, what I heard was correct. Feed came in a close second for best novel. If I'm reading the chart correctly, several items, including Feed, came in ahead in votes for the #1 spot, but didn't win due to the method used for counting ballots by ranking. Very interesting.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-22 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fionn320.livejournal.com
In order to win, an entry must get 50%+1, if I am understanding the rules correctly. Therefore, when your first choice is eliminated, your vote goes to your number 2 ranking, and so on, until a clear winner is chosen. All of the nominees were Hugo-worthy in my opinion, so ranking them in order of preference was difficult, but very important for the final tally.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-22 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] birder2.livejournal.com
I can't believe how few of the winners I am familiar with!

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 09:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios