filkertom: (Default)
[personal profile] filkertom
Responding to questions about massive arrests of peaceful protesters overnight, Boston mayor Thomas Menino said this:
Civil disobedience doesn’t work for Boston; it doesn’t work for anyone.
In Boston. He said this in Boston.

So much WUT I DON'T EVEN.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talonvaki.livejournal.com
*sigh* Oh, Mumbles...

I think he took the same American History class that Sarah Palin did.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stormsdotter.livejournal.com
Out of my head, please.

I love the city next door, but hate its Mayor.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeffr23.livejournal.com
While I doubt he thought it through this much, the (original) Tea Party wasn't Civil Disobedience.

If you're doing anything to avoid arrest, what you're doing is not in any way civil disobedience.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alverant.livejournal.com
He may want to check out the civil rights marches in Dixieland about 50 years ago.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sean cleary (from livejournal.com)
The mayor may well be right.
Peaceful civil disobedience may not work in Boston.
The town has a much longer and more effective history of rioting.
This history goes back to the colonial days, and is featured in the 'Boston Massacre'.
But these days most people try the nicer civil disobedience route first.
It has been too long since Boston had a good non-sports related riot.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 08:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diego001.livejournal.com
I didn't think of it this way. Thank you.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 09:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnridley.livejournal.com
You're right. By squashing these protests, he's sending a clear message to the protesters. Riot, cause trouble and break things, THAT'S how you get things done there.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pandoradeloeste.livejournal.com
A friend of mine said that when peaceful protest is met with violent action, the only logical response is to double down and keep going, because you're halfway to winning. Of course that's easy to say when I'm across the country and my body isn't on the line, but I like the sentiment.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redneckgaijin.livejournal.com
Your friend needs to look at Syria, Yemen, and especially Iran.

Peaceful protests only work in systems where the government needs to pay attention to public opinion, either at home or abroad.

We've known for decades now that America doesn't give a rat's ass what people in other countries think of us... and our political system hasn't looked all too concerned with what the voters actually want in quite some time, either...

Unless the Occupiers get political, I don't think the protests will accomplish much.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 09:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redneckgaijin.livejournal.com
What gets me is this: the first city to do a thorough, blanket, knock-heads crackdown on the Occupiers is America's second most liberal major city (after San Francisco).

Granted, the mayor's trying like hell to turn parkland into penthouses, and he gives blatantly illegal preferential treatment to his buddies, but STILL.

Either Boston's reputation is ill-deserved (and I admit this may be the case), or one hell of a lot of voters have dropped the ball continuing to elect Mayor-for-Life Mumbles.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-12 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teddywolf.livejournal.com
Boston is one of the most Democratic cities in the country. It is not the most liberal by any stretch.

For all that one party had ruled the city and the state rather effectively for at least my own lifetime, and probably longer, they have generally been good at running the joint - not always Constitutionally, mind, but usually so.

Boston and Massachusetts, for all of the warts, tell me that I much prefer Democratic single-party rule to the other side. But no, I am not blind to the warts; and this recent thing is definitely a big ol' wart. My view of Menino dropped about ten points.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] louisadkins.livejournal.com
"Civil disobedience doesn’t work for Boston; it doesn’t work for anyone."

...

If you convince the public that *civil* disobedience won't work, you better be ready for the ride that will come next.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 11:39 pm (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
The lawyers are going to have a field day with the "looting" of the camps. Even during mass arrests you don't get to do that with personal property of the arrestees.

And yeah, civil disobedience is a royal pain in the butt. But the only *legitimate* way of dealing with it is to follow the laws *scrupulously* when you arrest the protestors.

Instead, he flouts the laws just as badly and thus does *exactly* what civil disobedience aims for. Namely, making the public decide that the government really *is* out of line.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-11 11:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annearchy.livejournal.com
So many of The Powers That Be seem to be terrified of The People.

(BTW I'm still in Madison, WI, where one of our favorite chants last spring was "The people... united... will never be defeated!")
Edited Date: 2011-10-11 11:58 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-12 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robin-june.livejournal.com
So the Boston aristocracy has finally managed to forget its illustrious Revolutionary history, now that it suits them.
This comes 30 years too late for my mother, who was perpetually shamed by them for the fact that her family reached those shores in the early 1900's instead of the early 1600's.

Pardon me while I step aside and spit.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-12 05:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jasperjones22.livejournal.com
Wait...isn't Boston the town where Yankee's and the Irish immigrants got into a fight during a funeral procession? Are you sure you made the right choice there mr man?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-12 11:41 am (UTC)
ext_74: Baron Samadai in cat form (Default)
From: [identity profile] siliconshaman.livejournal.com
Yup, your country really is up sh*t creek without a paddle. I dunno what you'd call your government now, but it isn't a democracy and it isn't American... not when those definitions include your Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-12 04:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] liddle-oldman.livejournal.com
It's an oligarchy, by and for the rich.

Like every other government that there is or has ever been.

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 19th, 2025 02:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios