It Ain't Me, Babe
Mar. 3rd, 2004 12:35 amOkay, this is really important.
If you get an e-mail something like this:
I guarantee that it is not me. Tom@tomsmithonline.com is, at this point, a dummy e-mail forwarded to my Yahoo account. There are no other addresses, no gateway, and I've never let anyone besides Leslie use the darn thing as an e-mail address. And I am definitely not sending any attachments unsolicited to anyone.
Heck, the "tomsmithonline.com" team is technically me and Da Bear.
I got two of these things tonight. And I know for a fact that I didn't send 'em to myself. The attachment doesn't seem to have a virus, but I don't know what it does have, and I'm not taking any chances.
If you get one of these, please let me know here, okay?
If you get an e-mail something like this:
Dear user of Tomsmithonline.com gateway e-mail server,
Your e-mail account will be disabled because of improper using in
next
three days, if you are still wishing to use it, please, resign your
account information.
For details see the attach.
For security purposes the attached file is password protected. Password
is "52403".
The Management,
The Tomsmithonline.com team
http://www.tomsmithonline.com
I guarantee that it is not me. Tom@tomsmithonline.com is, at this point, a dummy e-mail forwarded to my Yahoo account. There are no other addresses, no gateway, and I've never let anyone besides Leslie use the darn thing as an e-mail address. And I am definitely not sending any attachments unsolicited to anyone.
Heck, the "tomsmithonline.com" team is technically me and Da Bear.
I got two of these things tonight. And I know for a fact that I didn't send 'em to myself. The attachment doesn't seem to have a virus, but I don't know what it does have, and I'm not taking any chances.
If you get one of these, please let me know here, okay?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-02 10:05 pm (UTC)It's programmed to appear as an official-looking mail from your own domain, whatever domain that may be.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-02 10:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-03 09:59 am (UTC)This one really pisses me off; it's fooling even fairly savvy users at my place of employment.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-03 12:49 am (UTC)i guess it's a new virus.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-03 04:40 am (UTC)It's a pretty common scam right now. They've even mentioned it on NPR.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-03 06:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-03 11:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-03 11:02 pm (UTC)Also account spoof
Date: 2004-03-05 12:01 pm (UTC)Gordon D. Duke
ThingUnderTheStairs
Re: Also account spoof
Date: 2004-03-05 12:08 pm (UTC)Spammers are scum. But spamming crooks make regular spammers look like shelter volunteers.
Re: Also account spoof
Date: 2004-03-05 01:21 pm (UTC)Indeed. The average spam I can live with, until it cripples my servers. It is one of the dark downsides of capatalism gone to far but at least I can automate and ignore it better then half the shite that i get in my snail mail box.
The people pulling the scams are a whole other thing together. I have a bit of fondness for a well run con ala The Sting, but these people are using the mass spaming to catch those gullible people out there, or those that are too tired, busy, or unknowing to check up on it. It takes no talent and is indescriminate.
G.D.D.