So Many Outrages, So Little Time
Oct. 27th, 2009 03:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I think we could go on for days and days about the Senate health care compromise, including the fact that Joe Lieberman is apparently going to join the Republican filibuster against it -- can't have them common folk gettin' something they need, and all that, ya might take profit from somebody we go to parties with or somethin' -- but there is one glorious bit of sunshine today, truly a defining (in the dictionary sense) moment of right-wing fucktardedness.
You might've heard that, last week, Rush Limbaugh and others got pranked. The gist of it is, a satirical site made up a phony thesis that Barack Obama had supposedly written in college, and Rush believed it. And then it was exposed as a hoax, while he was still on the air Friday.
Well, here's what Rushbo said about it:
Thoughts on any and all of this? Political open thread. Please keep it civil.
You might've heard that, last week, Rush Limbaugh and others got pranked. The gist of it is, a satirical site made up a phony thesis that Barack Obama had supposedly written in college, and Rush believed it. And then it was exposed as a hoax, while he was still on the air Friday.
Well, here's what Rushbo said about it:
So we stand by the fabricated quote because we know Obama thinks it anyway.I would say "you can't make this stuff up", but obviously you can.
Thoughts on any and all of this? Political open thread. Please keep it civil.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 07:39 pm (UTC)Ow.
That is all.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 07:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 07:48 pm (UTC)Somehow, I still hold out hope.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 07:58 pm (UTC)Remember in 2000 when Rush played that phony quote about Gore claiming he invented the internet? Gore didn't say that and Rush still doesn't care about telling the truth.
So how would he feel if someone made up false quotes about him?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 08:16 pm (UTC)We'll never know, because we don't have to.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 08:28 pm (UTC)He immediately went on a rampage because "The liberals have to make up quotes to get anything on me" and insisted that the existence of a couple of false quotes invalidated the majority of quotes that were accurate and not only incredibly racist, but also incredibly insulting to the NFL. (Your opinion of sports and the NFL aside, it's usually not considered good form to insult an organization you then try to join.)
So, apparently, according to Rush, a false quote or two (which, by the way, were completely in line with the other things that he did say) attributed to him is not only a grave insult, but negates the accurate evidence that accompanies it. A false quote attributed to President Obama and regurgitated as fact by him, though, is OK because "we know he thinks it anyway."
Another example of IOKIYAR, I suppose.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 08:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 01:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 02:10 am (UTC)It's one of the ones I made, so go ahead and snag it; all I ask is that you credit me in the comments.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 03:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-31 11:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 08:52 pm (UTC)They've been doing that for years to Bill Clinton and Al Gore.
"Remember in 2000 when Rush played that phony quote about Gore claiming he invented the internet? Gore didn't say that and Rush still doesn't care about telling the truth."
The real outrage is that the phony quote was perpetuated not by Rush, but by the "respectable" "journalists" at the Washington Post and New York Times, no matter how often that quote and the other lies were debunked. Even when such disparate people as Newt Gingrich and Vint Cert asserted that Gore did deserve credit for making the Internet possible (by sponsoring legislation that allowing the network to be expanded into the public domain), the original lie was repeated and repeated and repeated.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 08:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 08:21 pm (UTC)I want to see that kind of ... is "honesty" the appropriate word here? ... a little more often from them, out in the open in front of cameras and microphones.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 08:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 09:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 12:59 am (UTC)C'mon gang, let's DO THIS!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 01:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 10:39 pm (UTC)Mandatory coverage is WRONG. But no one's talking about it. All the debate has been on the public option, which I strongly support, but no one mentions the fact that, should this bill pass, the insurance companies are going to get millions of involuntary customers.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 10:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 03:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 07:22 am (UTC)i wish we could just pass tiny bills with only one thing on it. e.g., public option, nothing else; insurance companies can't drop people once they get sick, nothing else. and so on.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 10:44 pm (UTC)One of the moderate/conservative commentators said the he believed Obama was at a disadvantage because his administration was required to make fact-based arguments, and that Fox News wasn't (and hence would lose the media war).
No found any irony in this. No one disputed this. No was shocked or horrified that this could be an actual argument against treating Fox News as not legit - that they would make stuff up.
I can't handle US politics anymore. I just can't. If they think Fox News is going to lie, then by golly, they too should not treat it as legitimate news source.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 11:01 pm (UTC)It is ENTERTAINMENT.
It's not to inform. It's to SELL ADS.
You could argue that a heck of a lot of the non-talking-heads shows qualify for that these days too, including all of Faux Snooze. The fact that said shows have any factual content atall is pure coincidence and definitely unintentional.
(Sure, I'm being over-the-top here. But only in the last sentence of the previous graf. The rest of it? I'm quite serious. Boortz was very explicit about it, telling folks not to quote him, but to check his sources and use their own - basically engage in responsible citizen journalism... wow, what a concept.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 06:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 11:54 pm (UTC)RushyBoy the drug addict, and how it's ok to make stuff up because he "thinks" (again with the word thinking... these guys don't know what that means anyway) it would be true anyway. He is living in an alternate universe with Bill the Loofah. Unfortunately, it is a dangerous alternate universe, bent on doing us harm. I seriously do not get it.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 12:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-28 10:17 am (UTC)Granted, I disagree with his position on health care reform[1], but it's nice to see someone voting their beliefs (or at least saying they plan to) instead of blindly toeing the party line.
Political parties are bad ju-ju. Voting against your own ideology or against the interests of your constituents in the name of party loyalty is fucking evil. (Yes, I realize that, in this case, Lieberman's ideology is most likely opposed to the interests of his constituents. Hopefully they'll remember that at the next election and fire his ass in favor of someone more appropriate to represent them.)
[1] It really would be nice to see more focus on health care reform, by the way, rather than everyone just talking about health insurance reform. Personally, I'd really like to see a system emerge which makes basic care cheap enough that you don't need insurance at all outside of major emergencies.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-29 02:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-21 11:17 pm (UTC)