Full Of Smite
Aug. 31st, 2005 05:07 pmI wonder if the jerkface religious whackos who are already saying that God sent Hurricane Katrina to destroy New Orleans because of a gay rally to be held there this week (a notion handily dismantled, as if it really needed to be, on About.com's Urban Legends page) realize how much they sound like terrorists groups taking credit for the most recent atrocity.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:17 pm (UTC)Honestly, you'd think people would focus on the fact that other humans are in trouble and need help.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 10:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:25 pm (UTC)Then again, a lot of those same imams tried to claim that the same tsunami was actually caused by an American or Israeli nuclear device under the Indian Ocean...
"Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots." - Jay Lessig
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:52 pm (UTC)Nice quote!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:26 pm (UTC)Actually, it's only 200 odd people, but it's still too many people believing that ridiculous of a statement.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 10:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-01 12:00 am (UTC)If it *was* a punishment, however, then based on biblical precedent, I would expect there to have been at least one and probably several prophecies given in advance of the hurricane to the effect of "Don't make me come down there...", *and effectively communicated to all those concerned*. A bunch of people miles away making claims after the event don't count.
And again, based on biblical precedent, my response to those who now are in need of rescue *should not be influenced one jot* by whether I believe those folks were the most heinous sinners. Or whether they deserved what happened to them. The whole thrust of the Gospel is that what we *deserve* is not an adequate indication of what God wants us to have, or to give to each other.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-01 12:13 am (UTC)(Yeah, I know, only global ones, technically. But still.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 09:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-01 01:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 10:30 pm (UTC)It appears that hurricane frequency and intensity is controlled more by some long-term cycle that we don't understand than by global warming. We had a bunch of hurricanes in the 50s, then a long quiet cycle while people built a bunch of stuff on the coastline, followed by another active cycle starting around 1995.
My personal (and slightly educated) opinion on why Katrina developed in such a nasty way follows:
We started out with a very active hurricane season this year. Then, we went through a substantial period where conditions were temporarily unfavorable for hurricane formation. We had Harvey and Irene in the Atlantic, neither of which were any great shakes, followed by Jose which blew up and immediately down as it hit the Yucatan. That wasn't much activity for August.
If Katrina had followed a normal path, it would have crossed Florida from east to west and curved north, pretty much following the coast. It never would have gotten very strong and would have dumped a lot of rain and done a little bit of damage.
Instead, Katrina was blocked and veered south across the Everglades. It didn't lose much strength crossing the wetlands and it got into the Gulf of Mexico, which was very warm because there hadn't been any tropical cyclones churning it for quite some time. The storm moved really slowly, still blocked by the atmospheric phenomenon that had forced it south, giving it plenty of time to intensify.
Once it got around the blocking event, it could recurve normally, but now it was a Category 5 storm aimed at New Orleans and the central Gulf Coast.
So we got a catastrophic storm instead of a couple of smaller ones.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-31 10:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-01 12:12 am (UTC)Sounds like?
Date: 2005-09-01 02:02 am (UTC)Which only goes to show that originality is not the strong suit of religious extremists of any stripe.
Maybe
Date: 2005-09-01 12:38 pm (UTC)I don't try to undestand devine motivation in this kind of thing, I don't think we can.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-01 05:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-02 02:56 am (UTC)