filkertom: (Default)
[personal profile] filkertom
My darling [livejournal.com profile] que_sara_sara points out this excellent bit of news, wherein four Illinois pharmacists who refuse to dispense emergency contraception -- thus violating Illinois law -- have been put on unpaid leave by Walgreens. The pharmacists' attorney calls the discipline "pretty disturbing". Fuckhead.

The story does sharpen one other point in my head about the ludicrousness of having to put this kind of law on the books, though: What cover-your-ass sanctimonious pro-life legislative whackjob thought that giving a pharmacist the "right" to interfere with the doctor-patient relationship on moral grounds, but then also requiring said pharmacist to take steps to see the prescription is filled anyway, does not put the pharmacist in the same moral dilemma he or she was trying to avoid?

Meantime, drop Walgreens a line and say "thanks".

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-01 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com
What cover-your-ass sanctimonious pro-life legislative whackjob thought that giving a pharmacist the "right" to interfere with the doctor-patient relationship on moral grounds, but then also requiring said pharmacist to take steps to see the prescription is filled anyway, does not put the pharmacist in the same moral dilemma he or she was trying to avoid?

The cunning SOB who figured that nobody would object when it was piously put as not making someone violate their own conscience... and that nobody would look ahead to realize that this was a wedge issue to put the pharmacist's opinions over the customer's needs. Make no mistake, the end goal is to eliminate birth control, period.

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 07:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios