Men exaggerate the number of sexual partners they've had.
Sooooooo...
Have you ever deliberately fudged the number of partners you've had, in either direction, to make a good impression with a potential trysting partner? "Yes" or "no" answers will do, and not mentioning it doesn't count as a deliberate fudging of the number unless you didn't mention it in response to a direct question about it (that is, avoiding the question rather than saying, "I don't want to answer that"). In my own case, I don't recall fudging the numbers....
Sooooooo...
Have you ever deliberately fudged the number of partners you've had, in either direction, to make a good impression with a potential trysting partner? "Yes" or "no" answers will do, and not mentioning it doesn't count as a deliberate fudging of the number unless you didn't mention it in response to a direct question about it (that is, avoiding the question rather than saying, "I don't want to answer that"). In my own case, I don't recall fudging the numbers....
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:02 pm (UTC)That I recall, anyway. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:10 pm (UTC)That said, I find myself wondering whether some women fudge the numbers downwards, as well, in an attempt to avoid the appearance of "sluttiness".
For some reason, as far as typical societal values go, it's okay for a man to have screwed a bunch of women, but if a woman does it she's regarded as a "slut". The best statement of this I've found is still attributed to a MAD Magazine parody interview with Rush Limbaugh, in which "he" supports sex ed for males but not for females. "After all, we want women to remain pure and virginal... until we get a chance at them!"
...aaand I'm going to cut that rant off right there. Stupid double standards.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:11 pm (UTC)2,367,442
Date: 2006-02-17 08:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:23 pm (UTC)If you cannot reconstruct that list and commit it to memory, you've had too many :-)
At times, I was purposely unresponsive about the subject when I was a virgin. Beyond that, no.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:27 pm (UTC)...
Okay, maybe I have had too many.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:24 pm (UTC)Then the numbers might make sense :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:30 pm (UTC)I've lost count anyway.
Number of lovers
Date: 2006-02-17 08:33 pm (UTC)Recommended listening, by the way, to anybody who has answered this question, or thought of answering this question: "20 or So," by songwriter Greg Brown, on Red House records. (I don't know which album this is on.)
Nate Bucklin
Re: Number of lovers
Date: 2006-02-17 09:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:40 pm (UTC)Nope
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 08:57 pm (UTC)Interesting article, and exercise.
No, I have never intentionally fudged. I can think of cases where I should have, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 09:22 pm (UTC)I have avoided numbers, but never lied when asked directly.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 09:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-02-17 09:22 pm (UTC)Oh, jeez! I don't think I can make a list.
Is it okay if I just shrug and say, "A lot"?