I got this from
markbernstein, who got it from
supergee, who got it from
anne_jumps.
Remember South Dakota State Senator Bill Napoli? Well, he's made a new friend -- not:
Update:
kathrynt called and got contact and support-donation info.
Remember South Dakota State Senator Bill Napoli? Well, he's made a new friend -- not:
When Governor Mike Rounds signed HB 1215 into law it effectively banned all abortions in the state with the exception that it did allow saving the mother’s life. There were, however, no exceptions for victims of rape or incest. His actions, and the comments of State Senators like Bill Napoli of Rapid City, SD, set of a maelstrom of protests within the state.(article by Tim Giago of The Native American Times.)
Napoli suggested that if it was a case of “simple rape,” there should be no thoughts of ending a pregnancy. Letters by the hundreds appeared in local newspapers, mostly written by women, challenging Napoli’s description of rape as “simple.” He has yet to explain satisfactorily what he meant by “simple rape.”
The President of the Oglala Sioux Tribe on the Pine Ridge Reservation, Cecilia Fire Thunder, was incensed. A former nurse and healthcare giver, she was very angry that a state body, made up mostly of white males, would make such a stupid law against women.
“To me, it is now a question of sovereignty,” she said to me last week. “I will personally establish a Planned Parenthood clinic on my own land which is within the boundaries of the Pine Ridge Reservation where the State of South Dakota has absolutely no jurisdiction.”
Strong words from a very strong lady. I hope Ms. Fire Thunder challenges Gov. Rounds and the state legislators on this law that is an affront to all independent women.
Update:
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:19 pm (UTC)They're apparently stunned that anybody outside South Dakota knows or cares.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:54 pm (UTC)" brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated."
that is apparently complex rape - the type that might earn you the right to get an abortion
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 01:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 02:18 pm (UTC)Of course! Because all those non-religious heathens have no moral code, which means their women must be all skankhos in the first place. Or they're the kind of cocktease who cries rape after leading the innocent guy on, like that girl in the Haidl case. The defense there (almost successfully) argued that the underaged, unconscious girl had consented to being raped, sodimized, burned, and having obscenities written on her skin simply because she wasn't a virgin before it happened. Just because she was so out of it in the tape that someone thought she was *dead* didn't mean that she hadn't consented before the tape began to roll!
Actual court case... and not only did the guys almost get away with it despite the videotape, but presumably because she was neither religious nor virgin, presumably if she got preggers South Dakota would make her "accept the consequences of her actions."
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 02:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:56 pm (UTC)Someone should tell him that "sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it" actually doesn't lead to pregnancy. So maybe sodomy is okay. *ugh*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 11:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 12:13 am (UTC)Also, if enough of those godless homosexual men rape another man enough times in one night, it is possible for the male victim to get pregnant. If such a thing were to happen, then Mr. Napoli would allow the man to abort. Because that would be, you know, unusual circumstances.
Ain't Governor Rounds up for re-election this year? Any idea who's challenging him? I hear Tom Daschle's looking for a job...come to think of it, "Governor Fire Thunder" has a nice ring to it...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 12:28 am (UTC)I'm glad I put in my two years in
HellSouth Dakota and got the hell out.Rounds was elected in 2002, so he should be up for re-election this year. Wikipedia indicates he hasn't made a formal re-election announcement yet, nor had any candidate made one to oppose him.
Also, I just noticed a poll indicating that 57% of South Dakotans surveyed said they'd vote to overturn the ban if it were on the ballot in November. Too bad the last I heard, the drive to get it on the ballot was being pursued by some folks out of Wisconsin; I think that might hurt its chances.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 05:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:50 pm (UTC)We all know this law is bullshit and this is just the first chink out of it.. it'll crumble.
But its still scary that any legislative body in this country would pass it in the first place.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 11:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 11:29 pm (UTC)Good on her!
And a telling little story... when the governor of SD signed the bill, they heightened security in the capitol of the state, SURE that there would be all kinds of violent protests, and that the governor would get death threats etc.
There was nothing of the kind. At all. None whatsoever. Just some annoyed letters, and angry editorials.
It makes one want to write the governor and say, "No, we're not violent lunatics. That's the fringe on the OTHER side of the debate."
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 11:43 pm (UTC)That reminds me . . .
Date: 2006-03-23 12:21 am (UTC)Re: That reminds me . . .
Date: 2006-03-23 12:30 am (UTC)Personally, I like the term "simple rape." I mean, if you were only raped, geez, what do you want? Pity?
(AND WHAT THE HELL can his justification POSSIBLY be for not having an incest clause?)
Re: That reminds me . . .
Date: 2006-03-23 01:23 am (UTC)Re: That reminds me . . .
Date: 2006-03-23 02:29 am (UTC)Re: That reminds me . . .
Date: 2006-03-23 02:28 pm (UTC)brutally raped= broken bones, cuts, severe bruising, and tearing of the vaginal and or rectal area.
Personally haveing survived both "types" I wouldn't wish either of them on anyone. And i had a harder time healing from the "simple" one because so many people dismissed the attack because i wasn't bloodied by it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 03:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 06:24 am (UTC)Have you seen this:
http://www.minimumsecurity.net/toons2006/6034.htm
Someone posted it to a community I belong to (happy_feminists), and included the link to the original site so this is the link to the cartoon on the cartoonist's page.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 10:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 06:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 04:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 05:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-23 07:23 pm (UTC)So by all means castigate for the bizarre distinction or underlying policy, sure, but the word choice? Not his fault. Blame centuries of legal tradition if you must blame someone.