filkertom: (Default)
[personal profile] filkertom
Today's You Gotta Be Fucking Kidding Me moment:
Loyalty Day, 2006
A Proclamation by the President of the United States of America

Our Nation is blessed and bound together by a creed of freedom and equality that is entrusted to all Americans. Preserving the ideals of our founding requires the service and sacrifice of every generation, and on Loyalty Day, we celebrate the gift of liberty and remember our own obligation to this great Nation.

The dedication and selflessness of America's soldiers and their families inspire us all. Some of our Nation's finest men and women have given their lives in freedom's cause. By their sacrifices they have given us a legacy of liberty and brought honor to the uniform, our flag, and our country. The American people are grateful to the brave men and women of our military for their service and we will always stand behind them. I encourage all Americans to learn more about opportunities to thank and support our troops, from sending a care package to writing a message, by visiting www.americasupportsyou.mil.

Loyalty Day is also a time for us to reflect on our responsibilities to our country as we work to show the world the meaning and promise of liberty. The right to vote is one of our most cherished rights and voting is one of our most fundamental duties. By making a commitment to be good citizens, flying the American flag, or taking the time to learn about our Nation's history, we show our gratitude for the blessings of freedom.

The greatest strength of America is in the heart and soul of its people, and every time a volunteer reaches out to a neighbor in need, our Nation grows stronger and more hopeful. Thousands of Americans are serving a higher calling by mentoring, coaching, serving in Senior Corps, and by participating in many other programs that enrich lives and help build a better tomorrow. The light of freedom shines brightly because of compassionate people who care about others. Their dedication to a cause greater than self gives all Americans confidence in the future of our Nation.

The Congress, by Public Law 85-529, as amended, has designated May 1 of each year as "Loyalty Day." I ask all Americans to join me in this day of celebration and in reaffirming our allegiance to our Nation.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 1, 2006, as Loyalty Day. I call upon all the people of the United States to join in support of this national observance, and to display the flag of the United States on Loyalty Day.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

GEORGE W. BUSH
Where do we start?

Okay, first things, first, shithead. We've got Flag Day and the Fourth of July and Veterans Day and Memorial Day and however many other damn days we've got. And pretty much everyone who's loyal to the US (which group, believe it or not, Chimpy, does include me -- rather more loyal than you and your cronies, I daresay) is loyal all the time. It's not a weekend thing.

You want to reinforce the word "loyalty". That's a big word for you, and not merely because it's three syllables. Loyalty to you and to your family is the overarching trait defining your presidency. Those loyal to you are rewarded; those disloyal, or who you perceive to be disloyal, are punished.
You really have it in your sad little head that being loyal to America means being loyal to you, don't you?

You shmuck, all you are is a civil servant, and a fairly incompetent one at that. Not only is it not all about you, it never was.

I'm serving my loyalty to the troops you so callously use by supporting efforts to bring them home. I demonstrate my loyalty to the United States of America by upholding its spirit and working to get your bumbling, lawbreaking ass out of office and, ideally, into a war crimes tribunal.

Loyalty Day. Feh.

(Cross-posted to Mandate, My Ass.)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] cheshyre
Not to mention way to co-opt/undercut May Day itself

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 01:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jmthane.livejournal.com
Although I think for today, it should be "MayDay!"

And, coincidentally

Date: 2006-05-01 01:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capplor.livejournal.com
to be the same day as the big immigrant protest.

Re: And, coincidentally

Date: 2006-05-01 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capplor.livejournal.com
And to continue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalty_Day indicates that this law has been on the books for awhile.

Gee! Why has it never seemed important before this?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrfnord.livejournal.com
Ah but see, you're missing the subtext. Remember that today is when we're going to have all the huge immigration rallies in... well, pretty much everywhere.

So in contrast to all those people out in the streets calling to be treated like people, taking pride in their national heritage past & present, El Arbusto plays the "Real American" card. Trying to undercut the idea that immigrants are (or should be) treated like citizens, you see. Making noise about a loyalty day with all this going on is simply pandering to the white-sheet base of the Republican Party.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] umbran.livejournal.com
The quote above speaks about Public Law 85-529.

So, the implication is that Congress managed to conceive, write, pass, and get signed a law after organizers started planning the immigration rallies. This is possible, but given how slowly the wheels of governance normally spin, it seems unlikely.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morpheus0013.livejournal.com
Except Eisenhower proclaimed it first. So it isn't as if this Congress and President invented it. Bush is just using it to his advantage.

I wonder, however, is someone crafty in the immigration community scheduled the rallies for today, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] umbran.livejournal.com
Who invented it isn't really the issue. The question is whether right now it was done as a ploy to counter the rallies. I don't see Congress as being agile enough for the job.

I expect having the rallies today has more to do with it being the Monday before Cinqo de Mayo...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 07:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morpheus0013.livejournal.com
Well, my point wasn't so much who did it first as the fact that it wasn't really invented or ratified by this Congress, etc. etc. So it isn't as if it COULD have been planned for today, to coincide with the rallies--being as it's already been "Loyalty Day" on May 1st for a number of decades. You can't plan a brand new something that's already been in existence.

I'm not sure why the MONDAY before Cinco de Mayo should have any significance, but I haven't looked into it, either.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] umbran.livejournal.com
I got confused by the "proclaiming" bit. I (and I assume those who think about government sneakiness) assumed that the President wouldn't have to go signing a proclamation each and every year for the thing, so seeing a current proclamation meant it was in some way different/new.

Having since looked up Public Law 85-529, it looks like it is something that gets proclaimed each and every year. So yes, there's nothing new here. Even less sign of governmental do-jiggery.

Cinco de Mayo is on Friday. Having the rallies today means that the entire workweek becomes framed for Mexican pride. Given the issue at hand, that's a pretty nice policial-marketing ploy.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-02 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gan-chan.livejournal.com
May 1st, or May Day, has historically been a day of labor-rights action and celebration of workers. Wikipedia has a decent brief overview of the historical significance of May 1st (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_day).

The Congress and the Eisenhower administration wanted to kill May Day at the outset of the Cold War due to its socialist, Marxist, and by extension Communist overtones, so they came up with "Loyalty Day" as a way to try to co-opt the holiday that is most closely identified with Communism.

I suspect the proximity to Cinco de Mayo is just a convenient coincidence.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com
Look at it this way: Be loyal to America. Tell the truth about the cabal now in power, trying to destroy it. Not their perverted version of personal loyalty to his would-be Majesty, but to the Constitution, which we're reinstating in November.

And kick some right wingnut coccyx today!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com
Okay. I read your link, rather than your lj-cut. So yep. Complete agreement. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
My fault -- typo in the HTML. Fixed now.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com
Hm. What I meant was that I basically commented with exactly your own statement, having not read your comment but only the source material (that your first link led to). And yes, it seems we're in agreement that loyalty to the country does NOT require loyalty to a corrupt, criminal wannabe Emperor.

Loyalty

Date: 2006-05-01 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mannoftalent.livejournal.com
Also with that comes the next insidious idea

Loyalty oaths.

Re: Loyalty

Date: 2006-05-01 02:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-s-guy.livejournal.com
Coming to a school near you in three, two, one...

Re: Loyalty

Date: 2006-05-01 02:35 pm (UTC)
ext_80683: (Default)
From: [identity profile] crwilley.livejournal.com
We already have one...

Pledge = Oath
Alliegance = Loyalty
---------------------
Pledge of Alliegance = Oath of Loyalty.

This, more than the "Under God" issue, is why I oppose mandatory recitation, or, hell, even "recommended" or "encouraged" recitation. Patriotism cannot be made mandatory.

Re: Loyalty

Date: 2006-05-01 02:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sciffy-circo.livejournal.com
What was that about liberty and justice for all?

Yeah, I thought that was just my imagination...

Re: Loyalty

Date: 2006-05-01 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capplor.livejournal.com
Nah, That was Lincoln. Back when the Republican party was brand new & didn't have that much big business stuffing their pockets.

Now they're the Grand [b]OLD[/b] Party (as opposed to the Democrats who've been around since the beginning.) & they think they don't need the little guy.

Re: Loyalty

Date: 2006-05-01 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morpheus0013.livejournal.com
Mmmm...back when the Republicans were still Democrats.

Re: Loyalty

Date: 2006-05-01 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fractalwolf.livejournal.com
This, more than the "Under God" issue, is why I oppose mandatory recitation

Yeah, I've been bothered by the pledge in school ever since I switched schools in 3rd grade and realized that "I further pledge to honor the school rules (etc)" was not actually part of the pledge of allegience, and that we were all just standing up and reciting words without any real comprehension of what we were saying or what it meant.

Hmmm, I wonder if this has anything to do with promises, vows, and oatchs being taken more lightly now than it seems like they once were.

Re: Loyalty

Date: 2006-05-01 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catchild.livejournal.com
My step father got in trouble one year back in the '70s for not forceing his kindergarten class to recite The Pledge. He hadn't even taught it to his class because he didn't want to be party to teh forced pledges.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wookiee71.livejournal.com
From Him, I read this as L-oil-ty day. be true to your oil companiy, since their hands are firmly at his controls.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drzarron.livejournal.com
Mr. Bush, there's a Winston Smith on line Two

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] admnaismith.livejournal.com
And will Congress celebrate "Loyalty Day" in the most appropriate way it can--by taking steps to remove a traitor to American values from the White House? I ain't holding my breath.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:36 pm (UTC)
ext_80683: (Default)
From: [identity profile] crwilley.livejournal.com
Just as a note - this proclamation has been made every year since the '50's. It's not a Bush thing, although it grates more coming from him. It started out as a way to subvert that Commie pinko "May Day" thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
I did notice that. And you're right -- its obvious intention, steeped in the Cold War, was a counter to International Workers' Day (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_Day).

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] folkmew.livejournal.com
Bravo!
/me stands and applauds Mr. Smith.

How I managed to miss this little event is beyond me. Sigh....

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capplor.livejournal.com
Mr. Smith? Do you mean Tom or Winston? Or that quiet little FBI guy in the hallway?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 03:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mouser.livejournal.com
I call upon all the people of the United States to join in support of this national observance, and to display the flag of the United States on Loyalty Day.

Does anyone else hear this and think of 1938 and Germany?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morpheus0013.livejournal.com
Well. Sieg heil, Mr. Bush. YOU celebrate your "Loyalty Day." I'll be going ahead with Beltane just like I planned.

Though I do feel this weird urge to keep the Jewish half of me away from the kitchen or the bathroom today.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahtoalaska.livejournal.com
I think everyone should read "A Children's Story" by James Clavell.
The writer wrote it after his child came home and said the teacher told her that she would get a dime (I believe) for learning the pledge. He had his child tell him the pledge and then asked her what parts of it ment. Of course she didn't know. So he wrote a short story about how easy it is to take over our children. It's very scary, more so if you were never taught the meaning of the pledge when you were taught to say it. (No one I have personally met was ever taught What they werre saying)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] omimouse.livejournal.com
I had a minor fit when Bear-Cub came home from school last year. See, she had an assignment to memorize parts of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. I asked her to tell me what the parts she was memorizing meant. Her response was: "I don't have to know what it means, I just have to memorize it."

Yeah. She has been informed that she will be educated on this, and that I will fill in the gaps that her school is leaving. Over the summer, if I have too.

On the flip side, whenever she or her younger sister start spouting off with insults against Bush or his policies, I ask them to back their positions up. I don't want them parroting what they hear from the adults around them saying, I want them to come to their own conclusions.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-02 04:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gan-chan.livejournal.com
And good on you for both of those, say I. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] indyellen.livejournal.com
You beat me to it. I was going to recommend this as appropriate to this thread. ;)

I was in 7th grade, I think, when I stopped saying "with liberty and justice for all" in class - because there WASN'T. Now I just skip the "under God" part (if I'm at a school function - with my child - where it is requested) because I now translate the liberty & justice as being part of the IDEALS we strive for, rather than agreeing it has been achieved.

YMMV

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kimpire.livejournal.com
You've got it all wrong.

"Loyalty Fucking Day" is the day in which we demonstrate our commitment to traditional morals by having heterosexual intercourse.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 06:28 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 09:22 pm (UTC)
jss: (cthulhu)
From: [personal profile] jss
No thanks. Heterosexual intercourse, ew.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 09:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kimpire.livejournal.com
YOU ARE NOT DOING YOUR FUCKING LOYALLY. *arrests you*

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 10:33 pm (UTC)
jss: (cthulhu)
From: [personal profile] jss
See? It's a conspiracy to arrest the gay men and lesbians (or, if you want the epithets, fags and dykes)!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 10:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
FREE JOSH! FREE JOSH! FREE JOSH!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 10:57 pm (UTC)
jss: (badger)
From: [personal profile] jss
Hey! Even I'm not that chea...



Oh.
Well, that's different.
Nevermind. O:-)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 07:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peachtales.livejournal.com
And in addition to all of the aforementioned, they have now hijacked my birthday! Gaah.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armb.livejournal.com
I have to admit I'd never heard of Loyalty Day before, but reading the background about it having been declared by Eisenhower, Bush choosing to take advantage of it feels more like "yeah, whatever, you slimeball" than "You Gotta Be Fucking Kidding".
On a brighter note, our own local UK slimeball seems to be in enough trouble he might have to take his nose out of Bush's arse before the US can invade Iran. Not that the US actually needs UK support to fuck up the middle east further if they decide to.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 09:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smallship1.livejournal.com
I think Bush and Blair are locked in some sort of macho "how badly can we frod things up, how blatantly despise the countries we govern and the laws by which we do so, and yet still hold on to power and maybe even get re-elected" game. And yes, I know Bush is only allowed two terms under the current law, but given the amount of respect he's accorded other provisions of the constitution, I'd worry.

If anyone sees a very tiny amount of faith in the democratic process lying around somewhere, labelled Z.N., give it to charity or recycle it or something. I'm done with it.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-02 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armb.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] del_c points out that it's also Law Day (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060428-7.html).

This year's Law Day theme, "Liberty Under Law: Separate Branches, Balanced Powers," honors the wisdom of the separation of powers.

Now that's a You Gotta Be Fucking Kidding Me moment.

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 09:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios