Jumpin' JoeMentum!
Jul. 3rd, 2006 01:11 pmOh, you'll love this. Dubya's favorite "Democrat", Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, has just announced that he's going to remain in the CT Dem primary, but also start collecting signatures to get himself on the ballot as an independent in case he loses. Calls himself a "petitioning Democrat".
Which basically means what we knew all along: The only thing that matters to Lieberman is his seat at the table, his spot in the pecking order.
CT Dems should, bluntly, boot him out of the party, not give him another dime of campaign funds, and get squarely behind Lieberman's primary opponent, Ned Lamont.
How are your elected representatives representing you lately? I'm at about 60/40 -- Conyers is amazing, but Levin and Stabenow are a little uneven. Wouldn't trade Levin for anybody, though.
Which basically means what we knew all along: The only thing that matters to Lieberman is his seat at the table, his spot in the pecking order.
CT Dems should, bluntly, boot him out of the party, not give him another dime of campaign funds, and get squarely behind Lieberman's primary opponent, Ned Lamont.
How are your elected representatives representing you lately? I'm at about 60/40 -- Conyers is amazing, but Levin and Stabenow are a little uneven. Wouldn't trade Levin for anybody, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:30 pm (UTC)Personally, while I wish Levin was a little more pro-environment, I'm fine with him. Stabenow I like due to her health care stances, but her recent vote on the last amendment troubled me.
And Hoekstra is the Chairman of the Intelligence Committee, and despite his stance against Hayden, I usually find him unsatisfying. Of course, I am a liberal and he's a conservative that votes party lines on nearly everything, so that is probably why.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:27 pm (UTC)... too excited to spell correctly. Grr.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:07 pm (UTC)::blink blink::
HUH ???
This hurts to read ...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:28 pm (UTC)Yeah, I got nothing. Too bad there's no Babelfish translator for "Senatorese to English."
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 08:50 pm (UTC)Of course, that was in Rome, a few years ago now...
OTOH,
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 11:04 pm (UTC)In his speech, he seems to think that the Internet is short on bandwidth and does not want to encourage sending movies over the Internet because that would consume more of the channels (which he calls "tubes") that are best used for Web pages for small business and personal use. And he thinks that a regulation for net neutrality would encourage sending movies over the Internet, so he is against the regulation.
Erin Schram
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 10:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 11:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-04 12:19 am (UTC)Representation
Date: 2006-07-03 05:41 pm (UTC)Ben
Re: Representation
Date: 2006-07-03 05:43 pm (UTC)Re: Representation
Date: 2006-07-03 06:32 pm (UTC)Ben
Re: Representation
Date: 2006-07-03 06:42 pm (UTC)I like what I read from Tom Vilsack, governor of Iowa. I think he'd add huge credibility to a Gore ticket: geographic balance and a demonstrated ability to communicate to and win in a "red" state are at the top of the pragmatic list. (He's also not afraid to fight, and apparently holds a progressive set of values.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 05:57 pm (UTC)This quote from Wikipedia says a lot
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:02 pm (UTC)Ah, well... I guess can overlook it this ONCE.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:03 pm (UTC)My rep is Jay Inslee (the guy behind the Apollo Energy Project), so yeah...I'm pretty happy with him for the most part.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 06:52 pm (UTC)Hillary Clinton hasn't been much of a senator. Were she someone not named Hillary Clinton, she would be a decent first-term senator from the minority party, learning the ropes. But since she wants to president (or so we've been told by the GOP and the media), she asks to be judged differently. And there is nothing about her term that makes her worthy of that job. Her wishy-washiness on Iraq doesn't help either. I don't have any trouble with her being re-elected, but it would have been nice to have a choice from within the party.
My congressman is an unimpressive man named Anthony Weiner. He takes strong stands in favor of homeland security and Israel, but I don't know anything else about him, or whether he is good with constituent services. He is one of the interchangeable party hacks that get elected too often in a one-party city.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 07:17 pm (UTC)Pete "the Faz" DeFazio is wonderful. I hope he goes after Smith in 2008.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-04 12:35 am (UTC)I've just moved up to WA, but I was proud of Boxer, and Feinstein...enh.
No idea yet who my rep is in WA. (*checks* Dave Reichert--anyone heard of him?) I've heard good things about Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray, but I'm vague on details.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 07:28 pm (UTC)My Senators are Feinstein and Boxer. Feinstein is starting to annoy me with some of her positions and Boxer is too far-liberal for my tastes. (What can I say, I'm liberal on some issues, quite conservative on others.)
I find myself becoming a Goldwater Republican. Should the GOP ever get back to its roots of supporting a small government that sticks to the duties given it in the Constitution, I'd change parties.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 08:15 pm (UTC)Which basically means what we knew all along: The only thing that matters to Lieberman is his seat at the table, his spot in the pecking order.
Watching CNN right now, and they mention that Ned Lamont has no experience in public office. Watching an interview with Lieberman on the channel, he says it is because he really and truly feels that he can do a better job than his opponent.
Governance is not about loyalty to a party. When a man's political affiliation comes before the job he can do for his constituents, real democracy is sorely wounded.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 09:19 pm (UTC)And he would say that, wouldn't he? They all do. When I march on Parliament with fire and sword and crown myself King Zander the First, it'll be because I really and truly feel I can do a better job than anyone the people might elect. The money, the power, the perks, are nothing to me. Honest. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-04 01:38 am (UTC)Ah, but if he were a principled man, hedging the bets would still be a viable tactic. If it is important to him, it is worth hedging. What we are quibbling over is the reason for the importantce.
And he would say that, wouldn't he? They all do.
Yep. He'd say that in either case. That doesn't mean it can't be true.
That's the thing - so far, the observed behavior is consistent with both the cynical and the optimistic interpretation.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 08:22 pm (UTC)I'm still iffy on the senators
http://mikulski.senate.gov/
I kinda like her.
http://sarbanes.senate.gov/
He's leaving this year.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 10:41 pm (UTC)Erin Schram
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 10:55 pm (UTC)*waves*
well, I'd say good. you can look up his votes on the house websites and decide further from there.
At least YOUR rep isn't making news because he hangs out at the Moonie breakfasts or votes to support Jim Trafficant! yech, ptui. I've been dutifully trying to vote out Bartlett since I moved down from NY.
Mind you, I'm still in culture shock from that move and it'll have been 10 years in November.
I was a good voter - I voted in every election they held. EVERY year. I move to MD & do the voter reg bit when I re-regged the cars. I then went to vote on that tuesday.
okay, first - THE SCHOOLS WERE STILL OPEN! (election day is holy in NY - the schools close.)
Second, the place where I was supposed to vote wasn't hosting an election. (okay that I could buy - they expected such a low turnout that they only closed one school.)
Then came the kicker. I got to the place where they WERE holding elections and got told to GO HOME. *plotz* There was nothing for me to vote on in my election district.
NOTHING. No county, no state just the city which I lived outside the voting area. no referendums, no proposals - ZILCH. To give you an idea - there is always something to vote on every year in NY.
And I miss those good ol' lever action mechanical voting booths as well.
fellow Marylander
Date: 2006-07-03 11:36 pm (UTC)My house used to be in Connie Morella's district. I thought she was an excellent Congresswoman. Great constituent service, represented the views of the district, and stayed in the Republican party to 'fight the good fight from within' as it were. Sadly you weren't living in Maryland when we sent actual liberal Republicans like Charles Mathias to the Senate and Congress. Then you'd understand how the district could have voted Republican.
But Connie Morella was moved out thru redistricting. Now I find I'm in Albert Wynn's district. I have no idea what 'common interest' my suburban Montgomery County neighborhood is supposed to have with Mt. Ranier and Camp Springs but there you go. I'll have to check Wynn's positions and voting record between now and November.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-03 09:42 pm (UTC)At least my guy in the House is pretty good...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-04 03:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-04 05:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-04 05:19 pm (UTC)My real question is as follows - It was pointed out to me recently that there are actual, good reasons that it's usually governors, not senators who get elected President (to whit that being an executive is a different skill set than being a legislator, and it's good for people to have some experience before they get the top job.) Given that, does anyone here have anything good to say about their governors? (Other than Granholm, who's not eligible.) I am sad to say that Illinois' Rod Blagojavic is a tool, and may be indicted soon.
-Nameseeker