filkertom: (Default)
[personal profile] filkertom
I already have, because Arlen Specter is trying to enable BushCo some more with a FISA Amendment that would basically let the Chimp decide whether or not he wants to conform to the law. Two guesses which way he'll swing. Fortunately, some senators are trying to hold it in committee with additional hearings, and they're apparently making noise like they're willing to make a big stink about it on the Senate floor. But they need support, on both sides of the aisle. This isn't partisan; this is obeying the law. This is not violating the Constitution. This is the right to privacy.

Give your senators a jingle.

Update: Russ Feingold won the day. It sounds as if Specter will try this again next week, but we're holding 'em off for now. As some commenters as dKos noted, the really interesting quote was this:
Forced to delay his committee's vote, Specter grumbled that without his legislation the White House would continue its domestic wiretapping program virtually unchecked by the courts.
So, without this legislation, the White House will continue to wiretap Americans illegally? Heckuva job, there, Arlen.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-07 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morpheus0013.livejournal.com
Every time I read shit like this, I want to scream, "That's now how it works! You can't just DO that!"

But since, apparently, you CAN "just do that," maybe it's my high school government teacher I should be yelling at.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-07 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morpheus0013.livejournal.com
Er..."not." Not "now." Oops.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-07 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Your high school English teacher, then. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-07 07:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unclelumpy.livejournal.com
What should we tell them, exactly?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-07 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Tell 'em you're against the FISA Amendment, which basically would rewrite the perfectly good existing 1978 FISA law so that it would be "optional" for the President to obey it. Given that the original law was specifically written to limit presidential power, this amendment is foul beyond belief.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-08 03:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bschilli.livejournal.com
Sorry, but I didn't think it was necessary to contact Senator Feingold.

Ben

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-08 10:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
And he won the day (http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/7/221920/4879), too! :)

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 02:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios