(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 11:50 am (UTC)
ext_7730: (ncis - tony/gibbs - wtf?)
From: [identity profile] littlesammy.livejournal.com
Sheesh. They're hopping onto the 3D bandwagon, too? Meh.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] delazan.livejournal.com
...but, he's holding his wand! He's supposed to have it tucked under his jacket...

I wonder what else they'll screw up like they did the past two films under this director.
-L.

Disclaimer

Date: 2010-06-29 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
I am going to see this film for the sake of completeness. I really, really disliked the last book (http://filkertom.livejournal.com/669014.html).

Re: Disclaimer

Date: 2010-06-29 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizziecrowe.livejournal.com
I agree. The last book was not what it needed to be. She could have done a lot more. Not so much with the continuing of the story, but... yeah. No. The final movie will be beautiful to look at, it will complete the series, and close the function. And then it will be over.

Re: Disclaimer

Date: 2010-06-29 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saganth.livejournal.com
Close the function? Can't tell you're not into math, no not at all ;)

Re: Disclaimer

Date: 2010-06-29 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizziecrowe.livejournal.com
Wait, should I be insulted? I'm not sure what just happened here.... ;)

Re: Disclaimer

Date: 2010-06-29 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saganth.livejournal.com
*just whistles innocently... and runs fast just in case*

Re: Disclaimer

Date: 2010-07-01 07:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dan-ad-nauseam.livejournal.com
That's what she gets for putting plot over character.

Re: Disclaimer

Date: 2010-06-29 03:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annearchy.livejournal.com
I disliked DH so much that I never bothered to see HBP. One day I might add it HBP to my Netflix queue. My unhappiness with the last book was very similar to yours.

Re: Disclaimer

Date: 2010-06-30 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] delazan.livejournal.com
Go into watching HBP with very low expectations. I liked book six, but film six was so deviant from the book to be awful.

Re: Disclaimer

Date: 2010-06-29 05:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alverant.livejournal.com
"Thanks to JK Rolling for screwing up Harry Potter volume 6
Otherwise I wouldn't have discovered better written fanish fics"

Two lines from your Thanksgiving song (to the best of my memory)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allisona.livejournal.com
Ah, I can't be a nay-sayer. I gotta admit seeing the trailer gave me a thrill! I'm really looking forward to the final two movies.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allisona.livejournal.com
The icon is Severus and Lily- I always seem to have to clarify that...

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 03:06 pm (UTC)
ext_3294: Tux (Default)
From: [identity profile] technoshaman.livejournal.com
Thank you for saying; I never would've gotten it. (What's that from? obviously animated...)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allisona.livejournal.com
It's a painting that someone made into an icon shortly after the seventh book came out. The artist is http://theyoungdoyler.deviantart.com/, though I can't access that page right now at school to find the actual painting.

I have an extreme fondness for the tragic unrequited love of Severus for Lily, which is why I scooped up the icon. I realized out of context, though, it clearly looks like Harry and Ginny (and I would never provoke Tom with such an icon on his board, which is why I felt the clarification was needed :)). I added in the word "Always" awhile back, as in the book that's clearly associated with Severus and Lily, but even that still makes the icon too subtle for most people. I still like it- it's sweet :).

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Oh, provoke away. :) Canon is canon. Just don't expect me to read the H/G fanfic without a really good reason.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-30 01:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurel-potter.livejournal.com
Provoke, provoke. Okay, sorry, I couldn't help myself. Feel free to delete this.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-30 01:51 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 03:05 pm (UTC)
ext_3294: Tux (sharlin)
From: [identity profile] technoshaman.livejournal.com
Oh, that's not NICE. Holding out Part II for a YEAR FROM NOW?!

I'll probably see it. But then again I might just wait and watch it at home. I dunno. Only time will tell.

Motion picture event of a generation, tho, my fuzzy little butt. Book seven was the worst of the lot, and I think the hype machine may be about to fail. Everybody's forgotten about Harry and is all "ooh sparkly vampires" now...

Gripping hand? Emma Watson is just hottttt... :)

They shoulda done it Black Friday and Solstice. They could've scarfed up. They may well scarf up on November... but I betcha a dozen Krispy Kremes Part II flops... or at least, isn't even the #2 movie on its release weekend, much less #1.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allisona.livejournal.com
These two movies will make killer bucks. Take my word on it- many vampire fans (and those of us who are not...) are still sentimental for Hogwarts.

And I bet you that last movie will utterly dominate its first weekend.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 04:36 pm (UTC)
ext_3294: Tux (Default)
From: [identity profile] technoshaman.livejournal.com
You're on.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-30 01:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurel-potter.livejournal.com
Oh, that's not NICE. Holding out Part II for a YEAR FROM NOW?!

Well, yeah. But part one will be in November, and part two will only be 8 months from then; we don't have to wait three whole years like, say, oh, Star Wars?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 04:06 pm (UTC)
shadowe_wraithe: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shadowe_wraithe
I admit I am not a huge HP fan, but this is one(2) movie I will probably go to the theatres to watch, as it looks like it would be worth the large screen for the effects. Though I am unable to see the 3D due to an eye issue, I think even still the effects would be worth the pain of a theatre seat.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 04:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Fortunately, they also still have it in 2D. 3D is a nice gimmick that some films use well, and others do not. So far, the best use I've seen is in Toy Story 3, where the only effect it really had was to give the world unprecedented depth, which I gather was much like how it worked in Avatar on the big screen.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 04:39 pm (UTC)
ext_3294: Tux (Default)
From: [identity profile] technoshaman.livejournal.com
Up was good in 3d. No gratuitous throwing stuff at the camera (Alice did that, and I'm glad I saw it in 2D), just a nice deepening of the field and one or two roller-coaster shots that were more "wow" than "whoa". Didn't bother with TS3; not my thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-29 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allisona.livejournal.com
I liked "How to Train Your Dragon" in 3-D, probably better than I liked the 3-D in either "Avatar" or "Alice".

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-30 09:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madderbrad.livejournal.com
There seemed to be more Ron than Harry in this trailer! With Hermione clutching him in almost every scene. Ugh, nauseating. I guess the movies will be like the book in that respect; Ron maturing overnight so we can accept him as a match for her, aiming at that kiss at the end.

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 4th, 2026 07:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios