filkertom: (Default)
[personal profile] filkertom
I literally just heard this on Air America Radio, and Googled it up at Wired:

Cardinal: No Communion For Pro-Abortion Politicians
In remarks that could influence the U.S. presidential race, a top Vatican cardinal said on Friday that a Catholic politician who unambiguously supports abortion should be denied communion at Mass.
Anyone else ever going to invoke the doctrine of Free Will again?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 09:51 am (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
Free Will says your actions are up to you. And that's *all* it says.

*Consequences* of actions aren't covered.

This is *not* out of line, not unless you accept the premise that a religion doesn't have the right to set standards for its followers and penalize them for not following them.

It's a purely *internal* matter, except for any publicity involved.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 09:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Okay, yeah, you're probably right about that. I just get boiling over... well, you know. B-7

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 11:15 am (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
Well, look at it thiis way. The *intent* is to try to make the politician adhere to official church doctrine in his votes.

The *effect* may well be to have him start publicly saying that the Church is out of line.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 10:56 am (UTC)
djonn: Self-portrait, May 2025 (Default)
From: [personal profile] djonn
The writer of the piece is also assuming that rank-and-file US Catholics actually pay attention to what Vatican cardinals tell them -- which is a pretty large assumption in this day and age.

schism?

Date: 2004-04-23 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popefelix.livejournal.com
does anyone think this, and/or the gay marriage issue, will cause a schism (like a whole 'nother denomination) within the RC church?

Re: schism?

Date: 2004-04-23 11:32 am (UTC)
djonn: Self-portrait, May 2025 (Default)
From: [personal profile] djonn
does anyone think this, and/or the gay marriage issue, will cause a schism (like a whole 'nother denomination) within the RC church?

Doubtful. Too much of rank-and-file Catholicism already ignores the Vatican in real life.

Re: schism?

Date: 2004-04-23 02:41 pm (UTC)
poltr1: (Default)
From: [personal profile] poltr1
I'd like to see it happen, and if it does, it will probably happen soon. The number of men entering the priesthood is dwindling. I'd also love to see married priests and priestesses.

But to be realistic, I really doubt that it will happen. In my opinion, too many Catholics have bought into the belief that they should be meek and submissive, and to follow what the Vatican says, without question. In other words, they've become sheep. Those who dare speak out risk getting shunned or excommunicated. THankfully, that's starting to change, with the sexual abuse scandal.

The Vatican is the oldest of old-boy networks. They won't change what they're doing, or how they're doing it. Their philosophy is "99% loyal is 100% disloyal", and "Protect the hierarchy, the structure, and the establishment at all costs". It's almost cult-like, if you think about it in those terms. There's the charismatic leader (the Pope), and the psychological operations (guilt and manipulation) that they employ.

But I do love the sense of history, and ritual, and some of the music is quite moving for me....even though I left the Church behind to follow a more Pagan spiritual path.

I think it's time for St. Francis of Assisi to come back down and rebuild the Church, as he did nearly 1000 years ago.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 02:02 pm (UTC)
ext_32976: (Default)
From: [identity profile] twfarlan.livejournal.com
Oh, we have free will... we have every chance to do what the RCC tells us. (smirk) And we have every right to choose to go to Hell for any number of petty little things that really ought to matter not a whit to an omnipotent, omniscient being. (nodnodnod) SURE. Cause that's perfectly fair, right?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] umbran.livejournal.com
Free will isn't much the issue here...

As I understand it (and someone please correct me if I am wrong), in order to take communion in a Catholic church, the individual is supposed to be shriven - confessed and free of sin. But, in order for that to be the case, you've got to sincerely confess your sins.

If the Church thinks supporting abortion is a sin, and a legislator comes out of the confessional still supporting it, then obviously the politician wasn't sincere, and is thus unshriven, and cannot take communion.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 03:02 pm (UTC)
djonn: Self-portrait, May 2025 (Default)
From: [personal profile] djonn
If the Church thinks supporting abortion is a sin, and a legislator comes out of the confessional still supporting it, then obviously the politician wasn't sincere, and is thus unshriven, and cannot take communion.

This assumes that the priest taking the confession is also taking an unquestioning by-the-book Vatican line with the people entering his confessional. Which is also a large assumption in today's RC church.

Sheesh, doesn't anyone else read Andrew Greeley these days?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ororo.livejournal.com
If the cardinal is against abortion, then by all means he should never have one.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beki.livejournal.com
I dont think it will be a problem, he is just jealous cause he is not allowed to have sex :) That may even be why the preisthood is dwindling in population...

Whistling innocently....

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ororo.livejournal.com
Priests used to be able to marry, but then they kept leaving their estates to their families. Had to prevent that, you know.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beki.livejournal.com
Ah, but their sons then became princes of the church. The problem was paying off the dowry on all those daughters. The church never was all that friendly to nuns. They would have to pay to shut the girls up in nunneries... And then we would be back to the same problems.. women as preists indeed. They are just jealous cause women look better in black dresses than they do...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Kinda funny. The wording of my comment was not the best, but it's spurred an interesting debate with many side-issues. Perhaps I should be rhetorically slipshod more often. Why, there are lots of obviously unqualified people making skads of money in right-wing punditry.... ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-23 07:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stormlight811.livejournal.com
::laughs:: Oooh, I've heard this one before! Give me a minute -- Government has power over body + church has power over soul = church uses power over soul to gain power over government. Now church has everything! Right, I remember now: medeival Europe. If something works, keep doing it...

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 01:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios