filkertom: (Default)
[personal profile] filkertom
The Washington Post has a detailed graphic analysis of the CBS memos. Sure look fake, or at least recreated badly.

Their content is still uncontested, i.e., Bush disobeyed a direct order and went AWOL.

Update: Eeyup, the memos are bogus.

Their content is still uncontested. Check out the link below in [livejournal.com profile] shsilver's comment.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-20 08:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrlogic.livejournal.com
Why anyone would bother to forge a document without making the least effort to make the forgery credible is beyond me...unless the perpetrator specifically wanted the forgery to be discovered in order to discredit a person or party.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-20 08:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Which has been discussed a lot on some of the blogs this past weekend. The question is... who, and who?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-20 11:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrlogic.livejournal.com
It looks to me as if Burkett was duped and will take a heavy fall for this...but who is his "anonymous source"?

At this point, unless he's been threatened, it seems to me that he ought to reveal who that was. It's kind of important.

March 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2 3 456 78
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 11:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios