Lower Taxes Means Less Civilization
Feb. 1st, 2010 03:08 pmWelcome to Colorado Springs, CO:
This tax-averse city is about to learn what it looks and feels like when budget cuts slash services most Americans consider part of the urban fabric.But remember, gang: Government is bad.
More than a third of the streetlights in Colorado Springs will go dark Monday. The police helicopters are for sale on the Internet. The city is dumping firefighting jobs, a vice team, burglary investigators, beat cops — dozens of police and fire positions will go unfilled.
The parks department removed trash cans last week, replacing them with signs urging users to pack out their own litter.
Neighbors are encouraged to bring their own lawn mowers to local green spaces, because parks workers will mow them only once every two weeks. If that.
Water cutbacks mean most parks will be dead, brown turf by July; the flower and fertilizer budget is zero.
City recreation centers, indoor and outdoor pools, and a handful of museums will close for good March 31 unless they find private funding to stay open. Buses no longer run on evenings and weekends. The city won't pay for any street paving, relying instead on a regional authority that can meet only about 10 percent of the need.
"I guess we're going to find out what the tolerance level is for people," said businessman Chuck Fowler, who is helping lead a private task force brainstorming for city budget fixes. "It's a new day."
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:15 pm (UTC)Water cutbacks mean most parks will be dead, brown turf by July; the flower and fertilizer budget is zero.
The second will provide a resolution to the first.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:51 pm (UTC)And with not enough firefighters...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:21 pm (UTC)Don't worry Tom, the people that matter will be able to provide their own security force and keep their own lawns green. The people who don't matter will have to fend for themselves as it should be.
*sarcasm off*
I have to agree with the post title, taxes buy civilization. Anarchy won't provide it.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:24 pm (UTC)The rest of the poor scum will just have to do without.
How long before we see the lovely Colorado Springs turn into the worst slum in America? Take your pictures of the USAF academy now kiddies - you can be killed for that camera in just a little while when the gangs realize they overwhelm what few cops are left.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 02:18 am (UTC)Either that or a private gated community with only rich people in it and property owners complaining that no one will make the commute from Denver to clean their houses for them for subminimum wages.
The best part will be that Colorado Springs will no longer have enough people to get its own representative in Congress to urge the repeal of the 20th Century.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 11:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:29 pm (UTC)Yeah, me neither...
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 10:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 02:19 am (UTC)Maybe Rev. Whatsisname will reroute some of his budget for drugs and gay prostitutes toward charitable purposes.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 05:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:37 pm (UTC)Here's your chance, guys. Show us what life is like under your ideal society. And then once it blows up on you, maybe you can shut the hell up for a while.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 08:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:20 pm (UTC)Voters then rejected the idea of *tripling* property taxes, which makes sense, considering that "less to spend" thing.
It would be interesting to see how that city's rates compared to others' in order to judge. Do they have an anti-tax history that the reporter assumes readers will know about?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 09:56 pm (UTC)Which is why they have le zippo in reserve for this "emergency" in budgeting.
Adequate government doesn't just take taxes, it acts as a good housewife and uses them well AND saves anything left over for a rainy day.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 10:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 10:34 pm (UTC)Shame too, it's a very pretty town.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 11:13 pm (UTC)5 Military units are there, but if Fort Carson (the biggest of the 5) got cutback or much of it's personnel are deployed to Iraq/Afghanistan, that's large chunk of income gone.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 10:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-01 10:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 05:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 02:24 am (UTC)Taxation slashing: this is why we can't have nice things.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 05:57 am (UTC)They have an awful lot of Churches in Colorado Springs. I suggest they prey, er, pray.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 12:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 06:38 pm (UTC)A: A good start.
Seriously, though, it's interesting that this is going on in Robert Heinlein's old home town. Somehow, it seems very fitting.
In 2006, Money magazine called Colorado Springs their #1 big city, as far as the places to live go. What we now have is an experimental social laboratory where we can study the effects of reducing the footprint of government. It's population is around 375,000, so it can represent both large cities and middle-sized ones. Their elections are one year away--one year in which the rest of us can watch and see if the good citizens are willing to kick their addiction to paternalism.
My guess? They've got a decent base of folks with money there. I expect the museums to cut back an hour or two a day and use more volunteers. I expect private neighborhood day-care providers to start making more money than they had previously. I expect that landscaping companies will bring water and flowers to the parks in exchange for advertising.
I expect a lot of bitching about potholes, but the remaining civic money will be re-allocated to those few things city government is good at and by the time election day comes around, folks will be used to the new level of services and it won't make much, if any difference, at all in the results.
Police helicopters? Seriously. Seriously? Man, I hate the idea of police *anywhere* having better armament or armor than the average citizen.
Why don't we follow the unfolding story in here? If this is not just a scare tactic on the part of the city government, this example can provide a very useful guide to finding out which of us are right on this subject.
Tom Trumpinski
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-02 08:58 pm (UTC)I'm not saying the government is to be trusted. I don't trust politicians, because a pre-requisite of the job is the firm belief that you are better than everyone else, and therefore should play a part in enforcing what everyone else can and can't do.
But I trust the "decent base of folks with money" even less. In my experience, people tend to get money so they can keep it, and the residents of Colorado Springs have been SO desperate not to part with it that NOW, their trash cans and street lights are gone. If they won't even pay for this shit communally, why would any of them cover the entire tab?
I'm sure a few of them have ideals greater than "gimme gimme gimme" - about the same tiny ratio of higher-ideal-minded folks that exists in government, I'd wager, since greed for money and greed for power are two different things - but WHAT possible incentive could there be for helping a bunch of people who CAN help you back, but won't in a million years, just because they have the right not to? The only incentive that I see will be to charge admission for the public pools, and replace the donations box at the museum with something less voluntary. At least then people will have a choice, but I think so many will choose "no" that there won't even be a sliver of incentive there, either.
I wish I could share your faith in the generosity of rich people, but I think I may have lived too long. Still, as you say, we shall see.
(no subject)
From: